gt; To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
> From: phi...@gruar.clara.net
> Subject: [NSP] Re: Historical image of John Dunn, John Peacock?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matt Seattle"
>
> > Also, I wonder whether the keywork added by Dunn was 'c
This sentence, as well as the omission of editorship,
It is the inaccurate '2nd edition' rather than the 3rd which is of more
concern than the omission of editorship
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Seattle"
Also, I wonder whether the keywork added by Dunn was 'chromatic' at
this stage, but others will know more about this than I do.
No it was not chromatic, being just the four keys for low D, E, Fsharp and
high A, which just extended the ran
On 4 May 2011, at 09:52, Matt Seattle wrote:
> Also, I wonder whether the keywork added by Dunn was 'chromatic' at
> this stage, but others will know more about this than I do.
Hi Matt,
I think the problem with this text is that it allows some ambiguity. It's true
that Dunn was the first t
It casts doubt on the reliability of wikipedia is that the 3rd edition
of Bewick's Pipe Tunes is given as
'Bewick's Pipe Tunes', 2nd ed., Northumbrian Pipers' Society, (2010)
and without crediting any editor
Also, I wonder whether the keywork added by Dunn was 'chromatic' at
thi
