-
From: Philip Gruar [[1]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2008 21:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks
- Original Message -
From: [3]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NSP group" [4]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:0
.
What did they mean? Does anyone know, or was it ambiguous then?
John
-Original Message-
From: Philip Gruar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2008 21:33
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks
- Original Message -
From
"pegment sans appui"
I'm not familiar with the term. Is this what purists might call a
"dégringolement"?
c
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
The whole recent choyting "debate" has mostly reinforced my opinion
that it's better to try to teach people how to think musically than to
answer specific questions about what is correct or incorrect...
No, indeed we don't know what Peacock's trill signs meant, and the
vagueness tha
But there was at least one decent engraver in Newcastle!
And he liked pipe music too.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2008 11:56
To: NSP group
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks
On 22 Sep 2008
ember 2008 13:01
To: NSP group
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks
Thanks, both Julia & Chris.
Pretty much like lots of C18/19 marks on music then! And in the case
of a run of semi-quavers on the nsp I suppose it also has the
possibility of "do nothi
On 22 Sep 2008, Richard York wrote:
> in the case
>of a run of semi-quavers on the nsp I suppose it also has the
>possibility of "do nothing extra" ?
Just getting them sounding as they should (peas in a pod), is quite
sufficient challenge for most of us, I think.
Otherwise you cou
Thanks, both Julia & Chris.
Pretty much like lots of C18/19 marks on music then! And in the case
of a run of semi-quavers on the nsp I suppose it also has the
possibility of "do nothing extra" ?
Best wishes,
Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Sep 2008, Ormston, Chris wro
On 22 Sep 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote:
> We don't really know what Peacock meant by the trill marks. It's even
> been suggested that Mr Wright, the publisher, was wholly responsible
> for the transcriptions, and, not being a piper, gave it his best shot.
To Chris' comments I'd just like to add t
Richard,
We don't really know what Peacock meant by the trill marks. It's even been
suggested that Mr Wright, the publisher, was wholly responsible for the
transcriptions, and, not being a piper, gave it his best shot. We don't know
for certain that Peacock was musically literate (correct me i
10 matches
Mail list logo
