pegment sans appui
I'm not familiar with the term. Is this what purists might call a
dégringolement?
c
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
.
What did they mean? Does anyone know, or was it ambiguous then?
John
-Original Message-
From: Philip Gruar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2008 21:33
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks
- Original Message -
From
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2008 21:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks
- Original Message -
From: [3][EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NSP group [4]nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:09 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing
Richard,
We don't really know what Peacock meant by the trill marks. It's even been
suggested that Mr Wright, the publisher, was wholly responsible for the
transcriptions, and, not being a piper, gave it his best shot. We don't know
for certain that Peacock was musically literate (correct me
On 22 Sep 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote:
We don't really know what Peacock meant by the trill marks. It's even
been suggested that Mr Wright, the publisher, was wholly responsible
for the transcriptions, and, not being a piper, gave it his best shot.
To Chris' comments I'd just like to add
On 22 Sep 2008, Richard York wrote:
in the case
of a run of semi-quavers on the nsp I suppose it also has the
possibility of do nothing extra ?
Just getting them sounding as they should (peas in a pod), is quite
sufficient challenge for most of us, I think.
Otherwise you could
But there was at least one decent engraver in Newcastle!
And he liked pipe music too.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2008 11:56
To: NSP group
Subject: [NSP] Re: Fool, fearing to tread, aka Peacock marks
On 22 Sep 2008
