[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-30 Thread Colin
Ouch.
I didn't say it SOUNDED good though, did I. :-p
Colin Hill
- Original Message - 
From: Chris Ormston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Colin' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:42 PM
Subject: RE: [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3


No it Disnae!

-Original Message-
From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2006 20:34
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

Hey!
Nothing wrong with Disney. Never smile at a crocodile goes down well on the
pipes.  ;-)
Colin

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Ormston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3


 Post-Imperial cultural tripe, a few steps above Disney.  I didn't bother
 giving this piece a listen because one of my most unsatisfying gigs was
 playing the piper in a stint of Orkney Wedding.  It was clear that the
 composer knew very little about the pipes.  From the ornaments alone it
 was clear he hadn't even given the most basic tutor a once over, because
 one or two were impossible and most were pointless.  It required the piper
 to start in the lobby and walk in from the stage right.  Fair enough,
 except the piper's part starts on the beat four of the bar previous to the
 orchestra...playing the same melody a beat ahead of the orchestra.  You
 are supposed to do this while waiting off stage without being able to see
 the conductor.  Add to that the fact the conductor spoke only Japanese,
 and no one in the orchestra gave the piper a cursory hello.  Like
 playing with the Cheiftains, it may be prestigious but afterwards you feel
 like a cheap trick.  Wham, bam, there's the door.

 John




 Chris Ormston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 10/28/2006 03:28 AM

 To
 nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
 cc

 Subject
 [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3







 I managed to listen for a few minutes, then had to switch off.  The little
 that I heard clearly demonstrated the composer's lack of understanding of
 the instrument and its music.  Bagpipe music is all about the relationship
 between melody and drones, yet we were subjected to strange intervals that
 neither sit comfortably on the chanter nor relate to the drone
 accompaniment.  Previous works by this composer have included a piece for
 pipes which goes beyond the range of the chanter - enough said??? More
 high-brow, emperor's-new-clothes fodder using the pipes as a gimmick!

 Chris

 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 28 October 2006 08:47
 To: Richard Shuttleworth
 Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Subject: [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

 I had some of the same feelings myself. It definitely wasn't in the
 mould of the traditional music for the pipes, and while I do like to see
 composers and players branching out into other types of music for
 instruments from time to time, in a lot of cases unless one does stick
 close to the traditional style, one doesn't get the most out of the
 instrument (this is something I've also observed on the recorder,
 although modern recorder music is something quite evil which relies on
 techniques fit to drive you mad).

 But as you say, Kathryn played it well. There were some bits in there
 which I definitely wouldn't have wanted to attempt on any instrument!

 On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 18:24 -0400, Richard Shuttleworth wrote:
  Thanks for the heads-up.  I managed to catch it but was quite
 disappointed.
  The pipes were under-recorded most of the time and were often drowned
 out
 by
  the orchestra.  The second (slow) movement raised my hopes for a while
 but

  sadly missed a golden opportunity to showcase the pipes, almost as
 though
 to
  composer didn't really know how to treat the instrument and tried to
 bend
 it
  into a classical mold instead of taking advantage of the traditional
 gendre
  that the pipes could have made available to him.
 
  None of the above detracts from Kathryn's playing, she was superb!
 
  Just my 2 pence work,
 
  Richard
 
  Matthew wrote:
 
   It's working right now as I'm in the middle of the relevant piece.
   Probably won't be available after today though, as they take them down
   after seven days - may not even be available later this evening.
  
   I'm in no position to comment on Kathryn's playing style but it
   certainly doesn't sound like the sort of pipe music she usually plays
 on
   her albums. Of course, on her albums she's not got the Northern
 Sinfonia
   playing with her either.
  
   Tis good.
  
   On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 23:47 +0200, Bart Blanquart wrote:
   WILLIAM REEDER wrote:
Was this program ever archived?  I seem to be completely unable to
 find
it.
  
   The BBC seems to be having difficulty with the archiving feature;
 they
   have 'Performance on 3' archived for all days this week but friday.
  
   At the top of their radio player
   (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/radio3.shtml

[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-28 Thread GibbonsSoinne
Regular readers will know I'm not a fan of KT's usual playing style, but  Max 
has got some good piping out of her. Some of the crispest rapid  staccato 
I've ever heard her play. Some open fingered trills too, mind - are  they Max's 
or hers, or did they agree on them?
 
The piece is good to listen to - but Max didn't attempt to stick to a  
Northumbrian style - what traditional elements there are come from Orkney. At  
least 
with this he has accepted the necessity with NSP of working within  the range 
of the pipes - the harmonics in his 'Cross Lane Fair' were  very unhappy. Cor 
anglais playing with NSP gives a blend of sounds worth  hearing again, and 
perhaps this is enough justify the piece.
 
The mic placement was maybe a problem - but string quartet, cor anglais and  
double bass can make quite a loud noise together if the players have to -  NSP 
is stuck with a steady mf.
 
John
 
 

--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-28 Thread Chris Ormston

I managed to listen for a few minutes, then had to switch off.  The little
that I heard clearly demonstrated the composer's lack of understanding of
the instrument and its music.  Bagpipe music is all about the relationship
between melody and drones, yet we were subjected to strange intervals that
neither sit comfortably on the chanter nor relate to the drone
accompaniment.  Previous works by this composer have included a piece for
pipes which goes beyond the range of the chanter - enough said??? More
high-brow, emperor's-new-clothes fodder using the pipes as a gimmick!

Chris

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 October 2006 08:47
To: Richard Shuttleworth
Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

I had some of the same feelings myself. It definitely wasn't in the
mould of the traditional music for the pipes, and while I do like to see
composers and players branching out into other types of music for
instruments from time to time, in a lot of cases unless one does stick
close to the traditional style, one doesn't get the most out of the
instrument (this is something I've also observed on the recorder,
although modern recorder music is something quite evil which relies on
techniques fit to drive you mad).

But as you say, Kathryn played it well. There were some bits in there
which I definitely wouldn't have wanted to attempt on any instrument!

On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 18:24 -0400, Richard Shuttleworth wrote:
 Thanks for the heads-up.  I managed to catch it but was quite
disappointed. 
 The pipes were under-recorded most of the time and were often drowned out
by 
 the orchestra.  The second (slow) movement raised my hopes for a while but

 sadly missed a golden opportunity to showcase the pipes, almost as though
to 
 composer didn't really know how to treat the instrument and tried to bend
it 
 into a classical mold instead of taking advantage of the traditional
gendre 
 that the pipes could have made available to him.
 
 None of the above detracts from Kathryn's playing, she was superb!
 
 Just my 2 pence work,
 
 Richard
 
 Matthew wrote:
 
  It's working right now as I'm in the middle of the relevant piece.
  Probably won't be available after today though, as they take them down
  after seven days - may not even be available later this evening.
 
  I'm in no position to comment on Kathryn's playing style but it
  certainly doesn't sound like the sort of pipe music she usually plays on
  her albums. Of course, on her albums she's not got the Northern Sinfonia
  playing with her either.
 
  Tis good.
 
  On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 23:47 +0200, Bart Blanquart wrote:
  WILLIAM REEDER wrote:
   Was this program ever archived?  I seem to be completely unable to
find 
   it.
 
  The BBC seems to be having difficulty with the archiving feature; they
  have 'Performance on 3' archived for all days this week but friday.
 
  At the top of their radio player
  (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/radio3.shtml) it currently says We
  regret that many programmes are unavailable. We are working to restore
  normal service... so hopefully it'll show up soon.
 
  Bart
 
 
 
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 
  -- 
 
 
 

--







[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-27 Thread WILLIAM REEDER
I managed to listen to the broadcast this week also.  As Richard mentioned, 
the pipes were quite subdued in the mix, and that was disappointing. 
Enjoyed it anyway.

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Richard Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bart Blanquart [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Walton 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 6:24 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3



 Thanks for the heads-up.  I managed to catch it but was quite 
 disappointed.
 The pipes were under-recorded most of the time and were often drowned out 
 by
 the orchestra.  The second (slow) movement raised my hopes for a while but
 sadly missed a golden opportunity to showcase the pipes, almost as though 
 to
 composer didn't really know how to treat the instrument and tried to bend 
 it
 into a classical mold instead of taking advantage of the traditional 
 gendre
 that the pipes could have made available to him.

 None of the above detracts from Kathryn's playing, she was superb!

 Just my 2 pence work,

 Richard

 Matthew wrote:

 It's working right now as I'm in the middle of the relevant piece.
 Probably won't be available after today though, as they take them down
 after seven days - may not even be available later this evening.

 I'm in no position to comment on Kathryn's playing style but it
 certainly doesn't sound like the sort of pipe music she usually plays on
 her albums. Of course, on her albums she's not got the Northern Sinfonia
 playing with her either.

 Tis good.

 On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 23:47 +0200, Bart Blanquart wrote:
 WILLIAM REEDER wrote:
  Was this program ever archived?  I seem to be completely unable to 
  find
  it.

 The BBC seems to be having difficulty with the archiving feature; they
 have 'Performance on 3' archived for all days this week but friday.

 At the top of their radio player
 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/radio3.shtml) it currently says We
 regret that many programmes are unavailable. We are working to restore
 normal service... so hopefully it'll show up soon.

 Bart



 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


 -- 


 





[NSP] Re: Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3

2006-10-22 Thread WILLIAM REEDER
Was this program ever archived?  I seem to be completely unable to find it.

Thanks!

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 5:26 AM
Subject: [NSP] Kathryn Tickell on Radio 3


 Kathryn will be playing Peter Maxwell Davies 'Kettletoft Inn' tonight on
 Radio Three from the Sage Gateshead. It should be available on the 
 Internet on
 the BBC website for the next week I beleive so that it can be heard
 internationally.
 I haven't heard it so it will be interesting to hear what other folk think
 of it.
 Cheers,
 Colin Ross

 --

 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html