Hi Dave and others,
It's a noble attempt and a kindness to Dunk. But I still think that it's
impossible to make anything worthwhile out of that tune whilst remaining
literally close to the original.
Gilbert Askew and others associated with the compilation of the NPS Tunebook in
1937 treated it
Hi all,
After Dave Shaw piqued my curiosity I got round to playing with WSOTW
and thought I would offer this - the ending is a bit of a fiddle, but
whatever
X:11
T:NPS Collection
T:Whin Shields on the Wall
C:John L. Dunk
Q:1/4=100
M:2/4
L:1/16
K:G
|d2 |:B2G2 G2B2 |A2D2 D2D2 |G2G2 GABc |d3B d2g
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Gibbons, John
<[1]j.gibb...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
Matt has argued an octave pair of drones tuned Gg will work for The
Peacock/Mad Moll and other harmonically similar tunes like Cuckold -
you want to show up the contrast between the Am and Cma
, as I
think bead holes weren't invented yet.
John
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] on behalf of Dave S
[david...@pt.lu]
Sent: 31 July 2011 21:00
To: Anthony Robb
Cc: Dartmouth NPS
Subject: [NSP] Re: TOTM/shameless plu
Images can be posted on the NPS pipersforum.
Please can contributors keep their image sizes as small as reasonable.
In case of difficulty, e-mail me
Barry
Quoting Dave S :
Hi Anthony,
Would it be a possibility for you to play the 1697/8 Playford Mad Moll
on your primitive set? If you could ge
Sun, 31/7/11, Dave S wrote:
From: Dave S
Subject: [NSP] Re: TOTM/shameless plug
To: "Anthony Robb"
Cc: "Dartmouth NPS"
Date: Sunday, 31 July, 2011, 21:00
Hi Anthony,
Would it be a possibility for you to play the 1697/8 Playford Mad Moll
on
Hi Anthony,
Would it be a possibility for you to play the 1697/8 Playford Mad Moll
on your primitive set? If you could get a drone pair to G & C (assuming
it's G setup) Mad moll is in Am and has no Fnats in it.
I have attached a scan for you -- I know the NSP site will strip it off
--- if anyone w
Oh Boys, you've started something now!
Marianne.
> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:55:56 -0400
> To: d...@daveshaw.co.uk; nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu; anth...@robbpipes.com
> From: cal...@aol.com
> Subject: [NSP] Re: TOTM/shameless plug
>
> At least it's not
At least it's not a Wii studio!
Alec
In a message dated 7/29/2011 2:37:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
d...@daveshaw.co.uk writes:
Anthony Robb said
> I've been reluctant to vote on this since our house is fighting
back
> whilst we put in a new kitchen, down
Perhaps it's a question of increased convenience.
__
Von: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu im Auftrag von Dave Shaw
Gesendet: Fr 29.07.2011 11:36
An: Dartmouth NPS; Anthony Robb
Betreff: [NSP] Re: TOTM/shameless
Anthony Robb said
I've been reluctant to vote on this since our house is fighting back
whilst we put in a new kitchen, downstairs loo and new wee studio.
Anthony, I know older men can become obsessed with the toilet, but a wee
studio?
Dave
To get on or off this list see list information
11 matches
Mail list logo
