Thank you for using nssbackup and reporting this issue. Please note that
nssbackup and sbackup were re-merged. You should consider to switch to
current sbackup 0.11 (https://launchpad.net/sbackup).
in admin mode the alternative profile does not allow scheduling
This issue is caused by technical
Thank you for using nssbackup and reporting this issue. Please note that
nssbackup and sbackup were re-merged. You should consider to switch to
current sbackup 0.11 (https://launchpad.net/sbackup).
backup not possible if uncompressed data exceeds available diskspace even if
compressed data would
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: sbackup
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Also affects: sbackup/0.11
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: sbackup/trunk
Importance: Low
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug.
In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information
are required. Please answer the following questions:
* Is the bug reproducible; does it happen every time?
* is your backup destination on a local drive
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug.
In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information
are required. Please post the traceback of the exception as stored in
log file.
Thanks for your help.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug.
In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information
are required. Please post your (anonymized) configuration file that
caused this error.
Thanks for your help.
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665860 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665860
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665860
DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Rejected send message
* You can subscribe to bug 665860 by following this link:
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug.
I confirm this bug. However, I'll set its importance to 'Wishlist' as it
requires some deep modifications to the source code.
Workaround: create subdirectories for each profile.
Thanks for your help.
** Changed in: sbackup
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug.
@Jim Caughran: I'm not sure whether your problem is the same as reported
here. Please consider to file a new bug report if the issue still
happens.
@others:
Stacktrace:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689016
Title:
invalid literal for int() with base 10: '/ = 0'
** Summary changed:
- sbackup-gtk crashes while starting
+ sbackup-gtk crashes while starting: invalid literal for int()
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug.
The issue is cause by malformed markup:
/usr/share/sbackup/sbackup/ui/misc.py:215: GtkWarning: Failed to set text from
markup due to error parsing markup: Error on line 3 char 32: 'r...@xy.ext' is
not a valid name: '@'
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug.
This should not happen and case like yours should be caught gracefully.
Confirmed.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: sbackup
Importance: Undecided = High
** Summary changed:
- 'X is
Question #138516 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/138516
Status: Open = Answered
Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer:
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this
issue.
It works flawlessly from Steve's PC to
Ok, I may have discovered something. I had it set for Make a full
backup every [0] days trying to never make it automatically make
another full backup. This may have had the opposite effect. I changed
the system profile (system files and NOT /home) it to fifty days and
tried again and while it did
Question #138633 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/138633
Status: Open = Answered
Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer:
it isn't installed by default on a new Ubuntu
Yes, that's right. And I don't know who decides this (I guess Canonical
Question #138633 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/138633
Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer:
Some more details on progressive purge in sbackup 0.11.x:
* snapshot are not being 're-based' or modified.
* after some time (depending on your backup
Question #139241 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/139241
Status: Open = Answered
Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer:
Thank you for using SBackup. You'll have to set a value greater 0 for
Make a full backup every [?] days. Setting this
Hello,
thank you for answering.
At least this behaviour should be clear from the GUI.
By the way, sbackup improved greatly with nssbackup and the remerge.
Thank you for your good work.
Volker Peters.
Am 02.01.2011 17:45, schrieb Jean-Peer Lorenz:
Thank you for using nssbackup and reporting
By the way, sbackup improved greatly with nssbackup and the remerge. Thank you
for your good work.
Thanks for your acknowledgement.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup.
Public bug reported:
Based on a bug report originally filed by Volker Peters
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+bug/696092) to keep track of this
issue.
backup not possible if uncompressed data exceeds available diskspace even if
compressed data would fit
It is hard (impossible) to
I've created https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/696588 in order to
track this issue. Importance set to Wishlist.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696092
Title:
I've added this issue to sbackup. Confirmed as feature request.
Distinct profiles should be independend from each other and therefore
allow the setting of different schedules.
** Also affects: sbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New =
Question #138516 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/138516
Status: Answered = Open
sTiVo is still having a problem:
On 01/02/2011 11:53 AM, Jean-Peer Lorenz wrote:
Your question #138516 on Simple Backup changed:
24 matches
Mail list logo
