Question #143229 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/143229
Status: Open => Answered
Jeff Lane proposed the following answer:
Unfortunately, I don't have an answer for you regarding Simple Backup,
but I can tell you this, you can't "mount" a tape drive.
New question #143229 on Simple Backup:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/143229
I installed Simplebackup version 3.2 on a SuseLinux10.3 server Ran the
configuration file and It asked for the location of the mounted tape drive. I
entered the command mount -f /dev/st0 and I got an er
You have been subscribed to a public bug by Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz):
https://launchpad.net/nssbackup
"NSsbackup (Not So Simple Backup suite ) is a fork of sbackup (Simple
Backup suite ) ."
License: GPLv3
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Invalid
** Affects: debi
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675216
Title:
Sbackup-restore: Unable to upgrade backup from 2
The bug is reported against sbackup 0.10.5ubuntu2.1 and does not
encounter with sbackup series 0.11.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675298
Title:
sbackup does
Thank you for choosing sbackup and reporting this issue. I'll apply your
patch to sbackup series 0.10. Thanks for your help.
** Also affects: sbackup/trunk
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sbackup/trunk
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: sbackup/0.10
St
** Also affects: sbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: sbackup/0.10
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Question #141811 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/141811
Status: Answered => Solved
Doug confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks for the update!
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
Simple Backup Maintainers, w
> Still doesn't work. I also tried to set it up new, but then I could
not edit the line for the SSH connection and in the dialogue box I
couldn't get the settings right.
This is not related to the bug reported originally. Please consider to
file a separate bug if the issue is still valid.
** Desc
The problem stems from tar's commandline option '--occurrence' which
behaves inconsistently. It does work if a top-level folder is being
extracted but does not work for other directories. Unfortunately, pre-
release test didn't cover such cases. Sorry for any trouble - a fix will
be released ASAP.
Bug #709338 status changed in 0.11:
Confirmed => Fix Committed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/0.11/+bug/709338
"Restore/revert of non-toplevel items produces only empty folders"
This bug is linked to #140592.
restore/revert produces only empty folders
https://answers.launchpad.net/sback
I can reproduce this issue with following steps:
1. start sbackup-config-gtk
2. click 'Make backup now' button and start a backup process
3. keep sbackup-config-gui open until backup process has finished
-> the backup process (Python) remains in Zombie state until sbackup-
config-gui (its parent)
** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Bug #709338 status changed in sbackup in ubuntu:
New => Confirmed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/709338
"Restore/revert of non-toplevel items produces only empty folders"
This bug is linked to #140592.
restore/revert produces only empty folders
https://answers.launch
** Attachment added: "Restore log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/709338/+attachment/1812716/+files/sbackup.log
** Description changed:
Problem was originally reported by Julien on 2011-01-07:
Whatever button I click (revert/restore/revert to/ restore to), I only
get empty
Question #140592 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/140592
Status: Answered => Invalid
Jean-Peer Lorenz changed the question status:
Changing status to 'Invalid' because this issue is actually a bug.
Please refer to the linked bug report from now.
--
Y
Public bug reported:
Problem was originally reported by Julien on 2011-01-07:
Whatever button I click (revert/restore/revert to/ restore to), I only
get empty folders with eventually empty sub-folders. If I do the same
with a single file, the file is correctly restored. I can see in the
.tar.gz f
Question #140592 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/140592
Status: Open => Answered
Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer:
I've digged into it and found that your issue is a bug. The problem
stems from tar's commandline option '--occurrence' whi
Bug #709338 status changed in trunk:
New => Confirmed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/trunk/+bug/709338
"Restore/revert of non-toplevel items produces only empty folders"
This bug is linked to #140592.
restore/revert produces only empty folders
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+ques
Bug #709338 status changed in 0.11:
New => Confirmed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/0.11/+bug/709338
"Restore/revert of non-toplevel items produces only empty folders"
This bug is linked to #140592.
restore/revert produces only empty folders
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+questi
Question #140592 on Simple Backup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/140592
Linked to bug: #709338
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709338
"Restore/revert of non-toplevel items produces only empty folders"
--
You received this question notification because you ar
21 matches
Mail list logo
