[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found: no notification icon

2012-05-05 Thread BlueLight
We are not using Mint LMDE any more. This distro is too buggy and not enough support and since Canonical decided 5 years updates on the LTS we are back to Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup. https://b

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 588578] Re: Email notification/reporting doesn't work with GMAIL

2011-02-15 Thread BlueLight
Hi Jean-Peer, thanks for the release 0.11.4 and the fix for gmail accounts. I noticed that when I try to use port 465 for smtp which is Googles preferred port sbackup simple hangs and I have to kill it. If I use port 587 it works fine. in both cases TLS enabled. The Blue Light team -- You rece

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification icon

2011-01-25 Thread BlueLight
root 1473 0.0 0.1 19184 3652 ?Sl 03:07 0:00 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-simple-slave --display-id /org/gnome/DisplayManager/Display1 user 1922 0.0 0.3 18464 7276 ?S03:07 0:00 gnome- power-manager user 1927 0.0 0.7 27540 15364 ?Ss 03:07 0:01 /usr/lib

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification icon

2011-01-13 Thread BlueLight
sbackup --legacy-indicator 2>&1 | tee log-sbackup here is my output: 2011-01-14 08:02:45,233 - INFO: Log output for [Default Profile] is directed to file '/var/log/sbackup/sbackup.2011-01-14_08.02.45.232742.log'. 2011-01-14 08:02:45,234 - INFO: Profile settings are being read from file '/etc/sb

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification icon

2011-01-10 Thread BlueLight
log file sbackup ** Attachment added: "log file sbackup" https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/697654/+attachment/1790124/+files/sbackup-log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launc

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification icon

2011-01-10 Thread BlueLight
The timed backups with crom like 0 4 * * * work but without notification icon and no emails sent -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697654 Title: No desktop session f

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification icon

2011-01-09 Thread BlueLight
Too early :-) The scheduled hourly backup works but without notification icon. I saw it only once. The scheduled daily backup for whatever reason doesn't start also there is a clear entry in /etc/cron.daily sbackup -> /usr/local/share/sbackup/sbackup-launch Also the email notification does not

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification icon

2011-01-05 Thread BlueLight
The notification icon like in Ubuntu is working with all infos. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697654 Title: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notificatio

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 697654] Re: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification icon

2011-01-05 Thread BlueLight
No notification icon like in Ubuntu is working with all infos. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697654 Title: No desktop session found on Mint LMDE: no notification

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 696183] Re: Failed to set GID to `admin`: 'getgrnam(): name not found: admin'

2011-01-04 Thread BlueLight
Hourly backups run fine now. No notification icon like in Ubuntu but the backups look ok. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696183 Title: Failed to set GID to `admin

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 696183] Re: Failed to set GID to `admin`: 'getgrnam(): name not found: admin'

2011-01-03 Thread BlueLight
There have been some upgrades recently (D-Bus) . I am watching it the next couple of days if it works now. First test looked good :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 696183] [NEW] Failed to set GID to `admin`: 'getgrnam(): name not found: admin'

2011-01-01 Thread BlueLight
Public bug reported: I installed sbackup on Mint LMDE from source and the installation went fine with all dependencies are met. When I run it it terminates with this output. Can someone help me to solve this? I am using sbackup 0.11.3 on debian testing 32 bit released as Mint LMDE with Gnome De

Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #137333]: 2010-12-10 20:32:50, 936 - INFO: SBackupdDBusObject is being terminated.

2011-01-01 Thread BlueLight
Question #137333 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/137333 Status: Needs information => Open BlueLight gave more information on the question: I am using gnome 2.30 https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/696183 -- You received this quest

Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #137333]: 2010-12-10 20:32:50, 936 - INFO: SBackupdDBusObject is being terminated.

2010-12-16 Thread BlueLight
Question #137333 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/137333 BlueLight posted a new comment: Nobody any idea? -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup

[Nssbackup-team] [Question #137333]: 2010-12-10 20:32:50, 936 - INFO: SBackupdDBusObject is being terminated.

2010-12-10 Thread BlueLight
New question #137333 on Simple Backup: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/137333 I installed sbackup on Mint LMDE from source and the installation went fine with all dependencies are met. When I run it it terminates with this output. Can someone help me to solve this? I am using sbac

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622496] Re: problem occurs if nssbackup is run with the destination drive not present. It looses the config info.

2010-10-10 Thread BlueLight
Since sbackup and later nssbackup and much later nsbackup has been developed with a normal user in mind (as far as I understood) and since it deal with backups which I consider a VERY important thing to have an unnoticed backup failure needs to be avoided under any circumstances. For technicians li

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622496] Re: problem occurs if nssbackup is run with the destination drive not present. It looses the config info.

2010-10-10 Thread BlueLight
I mean barinov2000 not Igor. -- problem occurs if nssbackup is run with the destination drive not present. It looses the config info. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup.

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622496] [NEW] problem occurs if nssbackup is run with the destination drive not present. It looses the config info.

2010-08-22 Thread BlueLight
Public bug reported: (Not So) Simple Backup Suite 0.3.1 Lucid 10.04 32 bit fully updated When nssbackup is used with an external usb hardrive a problem occurs if nssbackup is run with the destination drive not present. It falls back to the default /var/backup directory. If on the next backup t

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 619576] [NEW] no log file entry when problem sending log emails

2010-08-17 Thread BlueLight
Public bug reported: When nssbackup runs a backup while the connection to the Internet is disrupted email not send :-) . That's not a surprise in itself but the log file is empty. I wondered why I didn't get an email. I am writing from a "development" country where the Internet connections are

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 616497] Re: Misleading option label: nssbackup is not cleaning up incomplete/corrupt backups

2010-08-16 Thread BlueLight
Hi, I don't share Andreas statement: Of course it is easy to delete them manually but than the wording should be changed. How do you delete as a normal user these corrupted files. IT's easy when you know "sudo nautilus" or the shell but how many user do know that. It is important for me to see if