[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 400145] Re: Option to ignore "file changed as we read it"

2010-01-24 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: nssbackup Milestone: release0.2 => 0.2rc8 -- Option to ignore "file changed as we read it" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 400145] Re: Option to ignore "file changed as we read it"

2009-09-23 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hi, I am adding a warning in the Log when TAR returns status code 1. ** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nssbackup Milestone: None => release0.2 ** Changed in: nssbackup Assignee: (unassi

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 400145] Re: Option to ignore "file changed as we read it"

2009-09-23 Thread Oliver Weise
I managed to find a "backed-up" version of a corrupted backup. The TAR archive seems valid. It also seems complete although I do not really know how to tell this for an incremental backup. Is there some way I can see from the other files in the backup dir what should be included? Also when I read

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 400145] Re: Option to ignore "file changed as we read it"

2009-09-23 Thread Oliver Weise
Hello Oumar, thanks for your reply, Ok, I understand. I thought you were tarring individual files bc. the changed file name was displayed in the error message. In my tests with tarring modified files the error message would only give me the folder name that I was tarring. So I think this is a spec

[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 400145] Re: Option to ignore "file changed as we read it"

2009-09-22 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, We can't split the processing, cause we are not launching file by file. We launch TAR just once with the list of files to backup. Then to add the functionality you want, it should be TAR that would provide it. But according to what you said, Tar creates a corrupt backup :-/ . Is it complet