New question #62529 on NSsbackup: https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+question/62529
Wanting for more sophistication, I want to try using nssbackup in stead of sbackup. (I've also joined the dev team to speed things up, since it all looks very promising). However, sbackup currently seems slightly more stable and reliable. I'd therefore like to use sbackup, while working on nssbackup. THis isn't possible when using the deb packages, due to nssbackup giving conflict with sbackup. So, the question is, why is this listed as a conflict? Are there really things that are incompatible between them? I know nssbackup is intended to replace sbackup, but should that not be up to the users (or distro builders) to decide? -- You received this question notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is an answer contact for NSsbackup. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
