UNCLASSIFIED
I am becoming frustrated with many things at Wolves, but one thing
plainly obvious to me is that Ebanks Blake is totally out of his depth
in the Premier League, he takes far too long on the ball..again it was
obvious and pointed out by David Pleat last night.
 
For me the spark has gone out of this team, Fletcher is the standout and
does very well with the limited opportunities he gets.....Frimpong was
looking good but there is very little else to excite me....its all so
bloody predictable...Jarvis's runs, the wayward passes, etc etc....it
really is rubbsh.
 
I had a feeling Mad Mick would put out an attacking side because of the
QPR result ...for gods sake, that was against ten men...the commentators
focussed on our very attacking lineup right from the start last night,
and we were lucky to get away with conceding five in all honesty.
 
Its probably too late for a replacement to make much difference now, the
damege is done...but what can we do?????????????
 
 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

________________________________

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 09:22
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies


When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said:
"I always feel I'm the right person to do it. 
"I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can
do."
He's said sorry , so that's all right then.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
 
We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch
of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans.
It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few
of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get
before it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated
with a Mick McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is
exactly what is now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure
there will be a positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we
could see to this would be for Morgan to replace him). 
 
Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his
favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield
despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this
position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest
gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity
and willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people
have been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards
but as pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a
shithouse left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there
has to be a mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying
players that he then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when
you buy a payer what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably
makes them worse players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't
manage it he doesn't play them. We have enough talent and variation in
the squad to be able to put out a team that includes graft with a bit of
guile but he insists on a completely 1 dimensional game plan based
around his idea of everybody 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in
the Championship, its not enough in the Premiership.  
 
 
________________________________

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
 
I wish we could see Mick's post match interview.
 
On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:



Should have been 6
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
 
sorry, 5 at home.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:




so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at
home?
On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:




Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence
to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 Logo<http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png> 
Before printing, please consider the environment
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only
to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may
contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and
Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised
alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the
views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose,
copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient.
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

Reply via email to