RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-20 Thread Paul Crowe
Milijas needs time in the team. He will come good. Our most creative player and hopefully one of our highest paid player's!! Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific   ConTech (Sydney Office)   PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW  2138 Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: p

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
And if that last second screamer had been 6 inches to the right.. ...it would have hit the post :( -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 9:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-20 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED They had two or maybe even three players totally unmarked for that second goal. Very poor defending. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 08:11 To: nswolves@googlegrou

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-20 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED One of the best games I've seen Wolves involved in for a long time. The last twenty minutes were edge of your seat stuff. At half time I was hoping Doyle would come on for Milijas, who was having an off game, but he improved, and if one of those through balls had worked out things co

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Rog & Reet
Yee-hah, finally a result. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 9:08 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Finally, you're making some sense. On 21 December 2011 09:07, Ro

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread mark worrall
Yeah, great end to end match. Has anyone else noticed how many goals we've conceded, or nearly conceded, from Ward not staying with his man ? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Steven Millward
Finally, you're making some sense. On 21 December 2011 09:07, Rog & Reet wrote: > Why would we want Mick out as he’s bugger all to do with how well we > play? > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sen

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Rog & Reet
Why would we want Mick out as he's bugger all to do with how well we play? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich I only saw the fir

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Although it looks like Bolton might be hitting form at the wrong time :-( But it only Blackburn :-) _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re:

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Steven Millward
I only saw the first half. Did we play well second half? Do we still want Mick out? On 21 December 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet wrote: > Why the were people booing after that game? > > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On > Behal

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
I think they'd been reading Steve's stuff on Molmix and want MM's wages cut in half? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:45 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
They were the Norwich fans -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:45 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Why the were people booing after that gam

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Rog & Reet
Why the were people booing after that game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 8:37 AM To: 'nswolves@googlegroups.com' Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What an i

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
What an incredible last few minutes - Original Message - From: Marcus Chantry [mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 08:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marc

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Damn good game of football in the end. I reckon we were very very unlucky not to win. Two really atrocious misses (Hunt and Ward?). Really enjoyed the last 70mins of entertaining football. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Marcus Chantry
What a great match. Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? >> >>

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Marcus Chantry
Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> Hear the commentators th

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Marcus Chantry
Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced? Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager > that made the inspired substitution > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 21/12/2011, at 7:36

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Marcus Chantry
Hear the commentators then: "master stroke by Lambert". Is he the manager that made the inspired substitution Sent from my iPhone On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys wrote: > Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves > there are in the second half. > > Se

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Chantrys
Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how many halves there are in the second half. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the > goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn... -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM To: nswolves@g

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Chantrys
Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote: > Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? > > > -Original Message- > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googl

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing game? -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich Im be

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Chantrys
That's actually a good idea Rog. Mick can use his halftime talk to give everyone a pay rise and then our season is safe. Genius! Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:18, "Rog & Reet" wrote: > Nothing to do with managers, all we have to do is quadruple our wages at > half time and the game's

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Not a great goal - but better than Hunt's miss! -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Norwich Nothing to do with manage

RE: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Rog & Reet
Nothing to do with managers, all we have to do is quadruple our wages at half time and the game's ours. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chantrys Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:10 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] No

Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Chantrys
Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they only seem to be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts. Sent from my iPad On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys wrote: > Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the > difference a manager

[NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Chantrys
Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as daylight the difference a manager can have. One has a team playing ineffective hoof-ball whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession football, which is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. Sent from m

[NSWolves] Norwich

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Great goal - shame it should have been flagged for offside. There's that 10% again Surman!! :-( _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 6:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolv

Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages

2011-12-20 Thread Steven Millward
It's like putting pearls before swine. On 20 December 2011 22:22, Rog & Reet wrote: > If only bookies gave out prizes for getting 35 out of 40 wrong. > > I’d be a millionaire, hang on, no I’d be a billionaire. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:ns

RE: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Tonks
What are you smoking Rog? They do give out prizes for being only one place out though don't they? You'd have only done your money in 22 out of 40 (but you can get a pay out for missing by two in an each way bet. in which case you'd have won 27 out of 40) I reckon that's about as good as a

RE: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages

2011-12-20 Thread Rog & Reet
If only bookies gave out prizes for getting 35 out of 40 wrong. I'd be a millionaire, hang on, no I'd be a billionaire. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:57 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject

Re: [NSWolves] Fwd: Prem league wages

2011-12-20 Thread Steven Millward
Thanks for these Paul. It's interesting that the correlation is even stronger the year before. When you combine both seasons, the chance of data falling into line like that by chance is about one in 59,000,000,000 (59 billion). On 20 December 2011 16:14, Paul Crowe wrote: > Dear Steve, >

Re: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-20 Thread Steven Millward
Interesting choice of quote. Belloc was an anti-Semetic, anti-Islamic Catholic who asserted that the Theory of Evolution had been completely discredited. Someone else who didn't like facts getting in the way of dogmatic personal belief and superstition. On 20 December 2011 19:51, Marcus Chantry

Re: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-20 Thread Marcus Chantry
In the words of Hilaire Belloc: "It has long been recognised by public men of all kinds, that statistics come under the head of lying, and that no lie is so false or inconclusive as that which is based on statistics." On 20/12/2011, at 10:42 , Steven Millward wrote: > Nothing. I showed you