[NSWolves] Decision
Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] Decision
Yes. Sent from my iPhone On 10/04/2012, at 10:30, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] Decision
But TC has simply demonstrated that the players brought in by McCarthy aren't up to the task of playing I the premier league. TC is trying to flog a dead horse that was of McCarthy's making. Mick had lost the ability to motivate his troops to continue performing above their ability and by appointing Johnson as the captain he effectively divided the team. Those actions are not the hallmarks of a successful manager and we would still be in the same position if mick were still here. Sent from my iPhone On 10/04/2012, at 11:41, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote: NO At least we had a fighting chance then. Now it needs a miracle. Sad thing is, even if TC did miraculously keep us up, he'll still be pushed aside for a name manager next season regardless. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.com wrote: YES From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 10 April 2012 10:31 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Decision Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? -- Boo! Curbishley out! CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] Decision
There is a second question here, and that's was the money spent on players and wages enough to survive in the Premier League for more than three seasons? If yes, then it's McCarthy's fault, if he sanctioned every player. If not then it's Morgan and Moxey's fault for not spending enough. There have been quite a few players that have failed at Wolves in the Prem but they were mostly small budget buys and the money was made up on selling on. Apparently it was in Johnson's contract that he be captain. I wonder if Mick sanctioned that? Doesn't sound like the sort of thing he'd do, but more of a Moxey move in the contract negotiations to save a few quid. I can't wait for Mick's autobiography to find out what really happened. I'm sure there have been a lot of odd dealings. I still believe that we'd have picked up more points under Mick, as the whole episode has been very destabilising for the players. Was talking to a few friends on the weekend and every one of them thought it was a bad move getting rid of Mick and that he'd built a good side on little money. On 10 April 2012 11:49, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: But TC has simply demonstrated that the players brought in by McCarthy aren't up to the task of playing I the premier league. TC is trying to flog a dead horse that was of McCarthy's making. Mick had lost the ability to motivate his troops to continue performing above their ability and by appointing Johnson as the captain he effectively divided the team. Those actions are not the hallmarks of a successful manager and we would still be in the same position if mick were still here. Sent from my iPhone On 10/04/2012, at 11:41, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote: *NO* At least we had a fighting chance then. Now it needs a miracle. Sad thing is, even if TC did miraculously keep us up, he'll still be pushed aside for a name manager next season regardless. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.com wrote: YES ** ** -- ** ** *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Tuesday, 10 April 2012 10:31 AM *To:* nswolves *Subject:* [NSWolves] Decision ** ** Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] Decision
Is anyone else sensing the irony that for most of the season we've been arguing the point that managers have no impact/effect on the success or failure of a football club yet here we are now trying to blame our current predicament on the sacking of our manager. Our wages dictate that we should finish 17th but that now seems unlikely. So I'm proposing that Moxey has been doing some creative accounting and that our wages are actually the lowest in the league. Either way, Mick was not and is not the answer to changing our fortunes for the better. Sent from my iPhone On 10/04/2012, at 12:59, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: There is a second question here, and that's was the money spent on players and wages enough to survive in the Premier League for more than three seasons? If yes, then it's McCarthy's fault, if he sanctioned every player. If not then it's Morgan and Moxey's fault for not spending enough. There have been quite a few players that have failed at Wolves in the Prem but they were mostly small budget buys and the money was made up on selling on. Apparently it was in Johnson's contract that he be captain. I wonder if Mick sanctioned that? Doesn't sound like the sort of thing he'd do, but more of a Moxey move in the contract negotiations to save a few quid. I can't wait for Mick's autobiography to find out what really happened. I'm sure there have been a lot of odd dealings. I still believe that we'd have picked up more points under Mick, as the whole episode has been very destabilising for the players. Was talking to a few friends on the weekend and every one of them thought it was a bad move getting rid of Mick and that he'd built a good side on little money. On 10 April 2012 11:49, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: But TC has simply demonstrated that the players brought in by McCarthy aren't up to the task of playing I the premier league. TC is trying to flog a dead horse that was of McCarthy's making. Mick had lost the ability to motivate his troops to continue performing above their ability and by appointing Johnson as the captain he effectively divided the team. Those actions are not the hallmarks of a successful manager and we would still be in the same position if mick were still here. Sent from my iPhone On 10/04/2012, at 11:41, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote: NO At least we had a fighting chance then. Now it needs a miracle. Sad thing is, even if TC did miraculously keep us up, he'll still be pushed aside for a name manager next season regardless. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.com wrote: YES From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 10 April 2012 10:31 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Decision Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? -- Boo! Curbishley out! CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] Decision
Saw an interview with Moxey on weekend and he was saying that the players at the club are worth 10 times what they were when MM arrived thanks to MM. And there wont be any tell all from MM. He was back at the club a couple of weeks ago to sign his confidentiality contract in return for £1m. SM learnt something from SJH. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.comwrote: There is a second question here, and that's was the money spent on players and wages enough to survive in the Premier League for more than three seasons? If yes, then it's McCarthy's fault, if he sanctioned every player. If not then it's Morgan and Moxey's fault for not spending enough. There have been quite a few players that have failed at Wolves in the Prem but they were mostly small budget buys and the money was made up on selling on. Apparently it was in Johnson's contract that he be captain. I wonder if Mick sanctioned that? Doesn't sound like the sort of thing he'd do, but more of a Moxey move in the contract negotiations to save a few quid. I can't wait for Mick's autobiography to find out what really happened. I'm sure there have been a lot of odd dealings. I still believe that we'd have picked up more points under Mick, as the whole episode has been very destabilising for the players. Was talking to a few friends on the weekend and every one of them thought it was a bad move getting rid of Mick and that he'd built a good side on little money. On 10 April 2012 11:49, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: But TC has simply demonstrated that the players brought in by McCarthy aren't up to the task of playing I the premier league. TC is trying to flog a dead horse that was of McCarthy's making. Mick had lost the ability to motivate his troops to continue performing above their ability and by appointing Johnson as the captain he effectively divided the team. Those actions are not the hallmarks of a successful manager and we would still be in the same position if mick were still here. Sent from my iPhone On 10/04/2012, at 11:41, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote: *NO* At least we had a fighting chance then. Now it needs a miracle. Sad thing is, even if TC did miraculously keep us up, he'll still be pushed aside for a name manager next season regardless. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.com wrote: YES ** ** -- ** ** *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Tuesday, 10 April 2012 10:31 AM *To:* nswolves *Subject:* [NSWolves] Decision ** ** Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] Decision
A big YES from me! MM would not have prevented us from going down. Where is the End of season Wake this year? A date in early May would be good. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Sydney Office) PO Box 3517 Rhodes Waterside Rhodes NSW 2138 Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: http://www.contechengineering.com www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 10 April 2012 10:31 AM To: nswolves Subject: [NSWolves] Decision Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
