RE: [NSWolves] Comments [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-04-22 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

What really piss-es me off, is all the false talk about continued improvement, 
and the long term plan.

After what has happened this year I really believe Morgan has an alterior 
motiveif he was concerned about his investment being totally ruined by 
relegation, I am certain he would have done more.

This season has been one huge blunder, most of us know McCarthy was sacked 
months later than he should have been, but then to replace him with someone 
like Terry Connor was hideous.to be honest any replacement would have 
struggled to keep us up, but we were left with almost no hope.

Now we have to start all over again...we have a team full of mercenaries who 
have jumped ship from relegated teams (did anyone else think the recruitment of 
players that had failed previously was strange?)... they will be off, and god 
knows what we will be left over for us to tackle to very difficult task of 
promotion.

Its been coming for months, and I didn't feel anything last night to be 
honest...and looking at the crowd...neither did they



-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Paul Crowe
Sent: Monday, 23 April 2012 12:28
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Comments

Just feeling apathetic about the whole thing.

We have been down for weeks, whoever thought Clipboard could turn things around 
has no idea about football.

Sincerely hope SM gets his head into gear and employs a good replacement so the 
rollercoaster journey that is the Wolves can begin again. 

Paul Crowe
Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
 
ConTech (Sydney Office)
 
PO Box 3517
Rhodes Waterside
Rhodes NSW  2138
Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
Mob: 0406009562
Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Website: www.contechengineering.com


-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 23 April 2012 11:48 AM
To: NSWolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Comments

Nearly 12pm on the day we have had our relegation confirmed and not a single 
message???  Should someone check for a pulse??

--
Boo! Curbishley out!

--
Boo! Curbishley out!

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is 
subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have 
received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and 
delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


RE: [NSWolves] The season so far! [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-03-21 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

The writing has been on the wall for a couple of years now. The powers
didn't see the signs or if they did were too stubborn to react
appropriately.
 
Now we are going down, they might wake up and realise what they have
been doing doesn't work...lets face it, we were very lucky not to go
down last year, and still didn't strengthen sufficiently..
 
Oh and Blackburn beat Sunderland .
 
At least we'll have a half fnished half empty stadiumand the old
chants of The New Stand can be reignited


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2012 08:00
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] The season so far!



After QPR's late winner things are looking even bleaker for us!

 

I have been trying to think of the positives from this season but all I
can think of so far is that Elliott owes me a case of Toohey's Red!! 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com 

Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com 

 

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


RE: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of One Mick McCarthy from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-03-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

That all makes sense...except for the last line.
 
 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 12:34
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of One Mick McCarthy
from Wolves fans...


You're quite right about it being a resort. At times it looked like some
of our lot were on holiday. 

The only difference I can see with TC is that the players arent fighting
as hard, or for as long, as they seemed to under MM.

TC loans Hammil out and insists on bringing Kightley on who just gives
the ball away nearly every time he gets it. Should be the other way
around.

Im hearing Guodie is being raved about at Notts Forest as their best
player, and they want to buy him. whyTF hasnt he been recalled ?

Its starting to look like Stearman is TCs love child, not MMs. Craddock
or Johnson would be a better partner for Bassong at the back.

And yeah, we were always going to get stuffed by ManUre. Im getting a
bit over these wild rally calls from the players every week before the
match.

Still believe we wont go down though.


On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au
wrote:


I'm not sure the result would have been any different with Mick
in charge. TC is a McCarthy replica and unfortunately has to make do
with the same players that Mick, and himself presumably, identified as
being of premier league standard. 

I've got no qualms with the resort. Man Utd have put 5 or more
past better teams thanks us eg Arsenal. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 19/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com
wrote:



http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17422980 


Hope all those who called for his sacking are suitably
satisfied with the consequences.




-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!




-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!



-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


RE: [NSWolves] Davis [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-03-11 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

O'hara has been disgraceful in the last few matches, why hasn't he bend
dropped. Apart from his woeful passing he doesn't seem to give a sh-it,
and now we are eharing he was involved in some kind of confrontation
with fans after Saturday's game. 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 11 March 2012 02:08
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Davis

I'm beginning to wonder if O'Hara is even capable of passing wind as he
certainly can't pass a football.



On 11/03/2012, at 2:51 AM, Rog  Reet wrote:

 Good question.
 It's got nothing at all to do with whoever is manager though.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
 Sent: Sunday, 11 March 2012 2:20 AM
 To: NSWolves
 Subject: [NSWolves] Davis
 
 This young Davis bloke seems like a decent player. Why is this the 
 first we've seen of him?
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 --
 Boo! Curbishley out!
 
 --
 Boo! Curbishley out!

--
Boo! Curbishley out!

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


RE: [NSWolves] Positives [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-03-04 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Probabaly the worst Wolves PL perfromance I've seen...absolutely
terrible.

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 06:46
To: NSWolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Positives

There was one major positive from this mornings game:

From the kick-off we didn't pass it straight back to Hennessey, instead
it only went to Ward at left back.  So quite clearly we are making
progress under Connor.

The rest was pretty ordinary:
Shots on target 12 - 1 to Fulham
60% possession to Fulham
 
I can't really think of any other positives.  Anyone?

--
Boo! Curbishley out!

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


RE: [NSWolves] Remaining games / points prediction.[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-28 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

A point against Norwich looks pretty optimistic to me Marcus.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2012 20:05
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Remaining games / points prediction.


Oh no, now Steve's losing his optimism...  what's going on? 


On 28/02/2012, at 20:59 , Steven Millward wrote:


I'm not sure I'd be that optimistic.


On 28 February 2012 20:56, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au
wrote:


My brain and eyewear this evening is a bottle of Prickly
Moses IPA.

 



Fulham 1
Blackburn 3
Man U 1
Norwich 1
Bolton 3

Stoke 1
Arsenal 0
Sunderland 1
Man City 0
Swansea 1
Everton 3
Wigan 1 


 

Total 16, overall 38 and just safe.

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe


Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2012 3:24 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: [NSWolves] Remaining games / points prediction.



 

Hello fellow Wolves tragics!

 

I have put on the Roger rose tinted glasses and
confidently forecast the following:

 

Fulham 1
Blackburn 3
Man U 0
Norwich 1
Bolton 3
Stoke 0
Arsenal 0
Sunderland 3
Man City 0
Swansea 3
Everton 3
Wigan 3

 

20 points!! We will be safe.

 

Realistically, if we can win all our games against
Blackburn, Bolton and Wigan we should have a great chance of staying up.


 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!



-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!




-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!



-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


[NSWolves] Toon Game [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-26 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Well if ever there was a game of two halves that was it;
 
First half, generally appalling, thought we were terrible although the
second goal was a little unlicky Newcastle can consider themselves
worthy of at least a 2-0 lead.
 
Second half, gives me optimism, we were equally deserved of a two goal
advantage, and overall a draw was probably about right.
 
Doyle was much improved, the most obvious change for me, apart from a
move away from wing play...or was I imaganing that?...Johnson for err
please.
 
 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I picked up on that too. 
 
Totally disgraceful the way this has all panned out...
 
Of course we don't know all the details of what has been going on /
discussed behind the scenes, only what has been leaked out.
 
It seems that whoever takes us on now is going to have to have a very
thick skin, knowing he was well down the pecking order.
 
What on earth are they playing at?
 
Is it the short term deal thats putting people off? 
 
Seems like Walter Smith was offered the job without a proper interview
or discussing finances, if thats the case we are now at the Very
Desperate stage.


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 05:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then !


Intereesting that he said he knows he was a fall back.  So will
everyone else now.

Maybe Terry will turn us down too.


On 24 February 2012 05:51, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com
wrote:


I was trying to be optimistic Roger!

 

Looks like he has joined the growing list of people who have
turned us down anyway! 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 10:36 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then !



 

You've used the win percentage but why not the draw percentage?

Gives us 4 wins and 4 draws from 13.

All this brings to mind the words straws, clutching and
astrology.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 8:35 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then !

 

Team

Nat

From

To

Record

G

W

D

L

Win %

Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. 

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 

16 April 1991

31 May 1998

1038000380

1024900249

100680068

100630063

100655365.53

Everton http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everton_F.C. 

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England 

1 July 1998

13 March 2002

1016800168

100530053

100500050

100650065

100315531.55

Scotland http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_national_football_team 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 

1 January 2005

10 January 2007

100160016

10007007

10005005

10004004

100437543.75

Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 

10 January 2007

15 May 2011

1020200202

1012800128

100450045

100290029

100633663.37

Total

1076600766

1043700437

1016800168

1016100161

100570457.05

[edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_Smithaction=editsect
ion=14editintro=Template:BLP_editintro ] Honours

If it is Walter, can we expect his win average of 31.55% in the
Premier League?

 

With 13 games left this would give us 13 x 0.3155 x 3 = 12
points (4 x wins).

 

Therefore, adding this to our current 21 points sees us with 33
points. Needing us to attain 7 draws to reach the supposed safety of 40
points!!

 

4 wins and 7 draws from our last 13 games!! 

 

I wonder what the odds on that would be Rog?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 5:30 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then !

 

My lawn is fantastic, so it might be a good move.

On 23 February 2012 12:48, Paul Hart wholiga...@gmail.com
wrote:

We want Moxey out on Facebook reckon Sir Walter is our 

RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

The prospect of Terry Connor running the show for an extended period
does not fill me with confidence, but its a funny old game.
 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 07:11
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


As Matt said, most of it is probably rubbish.
 
We're set to get someone from the lower leagues then, who can see this
as a big opportunity.
 
Or let clipboard do it until the end of the season and then get someone
in on a proper contract, whichever division we're in.


On 24 February 2012 08:01, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:




UNCLASSIFIED

I picked up on that too. 
 
Totally disgraceful the way this has all panned out...
 
Of course we don't know all the details of what has been going
on / discussed behind the scenes, only what has been leaked out.
 
It seems that whoever takes us on now is going to have to have a
very thick skin, knowing he was well down the pecking order.
 
What on earth are they playing at?
 
Is it the short term deal thats putting people off? 
 
Seems like Walter Smith was offered the job without a proper
interview or discussing finances, if thats the case we are now at the
Very Desperate stage.


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 05:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then !


Intereesting that he said he knows he was a fall back.  So
will everyone else now.

Maybe Terry will turn us down too.


On 24 February 2012 05:51, Paul Crowe 
pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:


I was trying to be optimistic Roger!

 

Looks like he has joined the growing list of people who
have turned us down anyway! 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 10:36 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then !



 

You've used the win percentage but why not the draw
percentage?

Gives us 4 wins and 4 draws from 13.

All this brings to mind the words straws, clutching and
astrology.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 8:35 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then !

 

Team

Nat

From

To

Record

G

W

D

L

Win %

Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. 

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 

16 April 1991

31 May 1998

1038000380

1024900249

100680068

100630063

100655365.53

Everton http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everton_F.C. 

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England 

1 July 1998

13 March 2002

1016800168

100530053

100500050

100650065

100315531.55

Scotland http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_national_football_team 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 

1 January 2005

10 January 2007

100160016

10007007

10005005

10004004

100437543.75

Rangers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangers_F.C. 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland 

10 January 2007

15 May 2011

1020200202

1012800128

100450045

100290029

100633663.37

Total

1076600766

RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Latest rumour on Molineux Mix is Steve Bruce ...guess there aren't too
many others left now.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 09:00
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


It would appear that money is an issue and we're seeing Moxey once again
try to operate on a shoestring. I worked with a Stoke fan back in
England who was delighted when they got rid of Moxey - he felt Moxey was
holding them back and there is no questioning their progression over the
last 10 years. 
 
I look at the current situation and think what value do you put on
Premiership survival? The money its worth has to warrant a sizeable
investment to try and stay up. The way I see it we have 2 realistic
options:
 
- get someone in on a short term contract who's a real motivator and can
get a bunch of players 'over performing' for a spell - someone in the
Ian Holloway mould. A 13 game contract is obviously not very attractive
and so that has to be compensated for by offering a 'too tempting' 
  financial incentive. Its no good offering a 13 game contract on bog
standard Premiership wages. The value of staying in the league is
phenomenal - why not offer a huge incentive to someone to keep us up?
 
- get someone you think can progress the team long term, regardless of
which league we're in, and offer them a longer term contract. Curbishley
(who I wasn't excited about but now looks a shining light compared to
some of the dross we've been linked with) went down with
  Charlton and brought them back up stronger, enjoying a prolonged
period of what undoubtedly had to be viewed as success given their
resources. I wouldn't mind seeing us take a punt on Poyet for this
option. 
 
The situation as is is a farce. Morgan and Moxey are looking like a pair
of clowns and its an embarrassment to the club. They knew this day would
come and obviously knew when that day was fast approaching - why didn't
they plan for it accordingly? 
 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 9:37 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


No it's that there isn't much money to spend on transfers and the wage
structure can't be changed.
  


On 24 February 2012 08:23, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com
wrote:


If Clipboard is given the job until the end of the season there
will be less than 10K season ticket holder's renew next season.

 

I do not know what this vision is that the 2 x M's are
referring to? It must be pretty radical or scary! 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2012 8:11 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Walter it is Then ! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

As Matt said, most of it is probably rubbish.

 

We're set to get someone from the lower leagues then, who can
see this as a big opportunity.

 

Or let clipboard do it until the end of the season and then get
someone in on a proper contract, whichever division we're in.

On 24 February 2012 08:01, Morris, Lee SGT 
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

UNCLASSIFIED

I picked up on that too. 

 

Totally disgraceful the way this has all panned out...

 

Of course we don't know all the details of what has been going
on / discussed behind the scenes, only what has been leaked out.

 

It seems that whoever takes us on now is going to have to have a
very thick skin, knowing he was well down the pecking order.

 

What on earth are they playing at?

 

Is it the short term deal thats putting people off? 

 

Seems like Walter Smith was offered the job without a proper
interview or discussing finances, if thats the case we are now at the
Very Desperate stage.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf

[NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-20 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager
now.
 
So much for good planning..
 
A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a
clue...
 
Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not
exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott.
 
 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


RE: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-20 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

They haven't got a f-ckin clue.
 
Its the same as when we are trying to sign players...We aren't going
anywhere until they release the purse strings a little more...I bet our
water tight budget is what put Curbishley off.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:46
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


It's looking more like Morgan had a bust up with Mick and lost his blob.
Good business sense that.
 

 
On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.au
wrote:



I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been
sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick
turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra
time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe
we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and
glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there.
 
In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this
as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that
it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to
get their stories. 
 
The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is
that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and
suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being
thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM 

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



UNCLASSIFIED

Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new
manager now.
 
So much for good planning..
 
A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got
a clue...
 
Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton,
Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott.
 
 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.




-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!



Logohttp://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png 

Before printing, please consider the environment

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are
intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is
confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken
transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not
responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or
attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you
receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your
system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any
part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.




-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!



-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


[NSWolves] New Mananger [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-19 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Looks like we may end up with someone totally unexpected, with rumours
that Curbishley and Bruce are out of the reckoning.
 
So many names being floated now, anyone got any idea who we may end up
with?

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!


[NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

The Scousers are coming, Jewell or a dramatic return for dithering
DJ???
 
Heard another version of events, Curbishley or Benitez.
 
This I'll take the latter.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


RE: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED
So based on the blame chart how many more points would we have, if we
had a blameless manager. 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 09:22
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent


Roger Johnson, the Wolves captain, has suggested that the players are
largely responsible for McCarthy's dismissal. Johnson has endured a poor
season since joining from Birmingham City in the summer and when he was
asked how much blame the players should take for McCarthy's sacking, he
replied: All of it. The manager can maybe take five to 10%.
 
Young Roger not only gives 110% on the pitch but in the blame game as
well.  
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


RE: [NSWolves] Timing [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Whoever they choose, I'd say there will be a pretty big bonus involved
for keeping us up.
 
So many names being banded about
 
Bruce is a real chance...moving back to the Midlands apparrantly
 
Curbishly---a lot of people favourite, certainly did the business with
Charlton for a number of years
 
I reckon either Curbishly or someone totally out of the blue...this
little situation must have been thought about for quite some
timeannouncement by the weekend I reckon.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 12:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Timing


I wouldn't be surprised if there's an announcement before the end of the
week. Mick's dismissal was not just a reaction to the game on Sunday and
so I'd imagine there's been some contact made already with likely
candidates sounded out.
 
I read an interesting article flipping the 'Who would your choice of
manager be' question on its head to say 'Assume you get a call from
Moxey saying you can't pick the new manager, but you are able to give 1
name to be scratcehd from the candidate list'.
 
Given what I've seen so far as the more realistic candidates, that would
be Steve Bruce for me.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Timing


When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
 
Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with
enough time to get a grip before Newcastle.
 
There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you
were manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same
team but tell them to play better.  There must be more to football
management hadn't there?

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


 Logohttp://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png 

Before printing, please consider the environment

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only
to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may
contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and
Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised
alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the
views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose,
copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient.

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-13 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
.



There is no midfield and our defense is
pathetic. I dont care if we had Tevez and Ronaldo up front theyd catch
cold.



Im not for changing managers but I soon
will be L



Matthew Leese makes very good sense in
his lengthy email.





From: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com
nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM
To: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com
mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



I like watching the games on fast
forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace.

I don't think the 'hair shirt' of
watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with
it.

Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a
football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it
anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we
only bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much.




On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus
Chantry  mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au  mailto:chant...@iinet.net.au
chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:

I suppose that's quite easy to say when
you don't bother staying up to watch the games live. Watching the
highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or
get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of
fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction,
to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves.



After scraping through last season Mick
and Morgan promised that there would be no repeat of the great escape
and that we would make progress this season. They have clearly failed to
deliver on that promise of progress so people should be entitled to
criticize.



However, at the end of the day if we
finish in 17th position, in line with our wage bill, then we will have
had a small victory in survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been
delivered on the pitch.

Sent from my iPhone


On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven
Millward  mailto:millward@gmail.com
mailto:millward@gmail.com millward@gmail.com wrote:

Dear oh dear, it's a good job this
generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have
surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same
fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what?



It seems no one has any stomach for
being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local
rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top
of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a
great run at the moment








On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim -
Sydney-MHA  mailto:jpar...@munichre.com
mailto:jpar...@munichre.com jpar...@munichre.com wrote:

I am now fully committed to the cause of
getting Mick out now.

Really dont give a sh*t who replaces
him: couldnt be any worse.

Think of those poor sods back home who
work with WBA fans.











From: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com
mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com  mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com
nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
To: mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com
mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves

RE: [NSWolves] Telegraph [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-13 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

The question should have been should Wolves have sacked McCarthy six
months ago...

The timing couldn't be any worse.

 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:31
To: NSWolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Telegraph

Interesting poll on The Telegraph website asking whether Wolves were
right to sack McCarthy. 

39.96% (1,198 votes) said yes
60.04% (1,800 votes) said no



Sent from my iPhone

--
Boo! Clipboard out!

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


RE: [NSWolves] Telegraph [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-13 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I guess when you see one of your little projects faultering, you have to
step in eventually. 
 
The next few weeks are critical.we've just got to get the
appointment right, if that is possible.
 
I saw a video clip of fans being interviewed after the game on Sunday, I
think we all had a little bit of loyalty to Mad Mick, but it he had lost
a lot of support recentlyand the stadium project was
mentioned...m


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:40
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Telegraph


Be interesting to see if Morgan backs off getting involved like he did
with Mick for so long.  I suspect he has the taste for it now.


 
On 14 February 2012 13:30, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:


Interesting poll on The Telegraph website asking whether Wolves
were right to sack McCarthy.

39.96% (1,198 votes) said yes
60.04% (1,800 votes) said no



Sent from my iPhone

--
Boo! Clipboard out!



-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

A bit late.
 
Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies


apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand.  some sort of
protest demanding Mick's head. 

On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:


I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. 

On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:



Should have been 6

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
sorry, 5 at home.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:


so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to
concede 4 at home?
On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:


Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at
all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.



-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.



-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

We have to take the risk and replace him now, no use worrying about who
can get us back up if we go down.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 07:10
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.

Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse.

Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.

 

 



 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

A bit late.

 

Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand.  some sort of
protest demanding Mick's head. 

 

On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:





I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. 

 

On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:





Should have been 6

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

sorry, 5 at home.

On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:






so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at
home?

On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:






Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence
to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.




CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and
may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re
Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other
defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be
the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable
for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the
contents of this message.


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED
I am becoming frustrated with many things at Wolves, but one thing
plainly obvious to me is that Ebanks Blake is totally out of his depth
in the Premier League, he takes far too long on the ball..again it was
obvious and pointed out by David Pleat last night.
 
For me the spark has gone out of this team, Fletcher is the standout and
does very well with the limited opportunities he gets.Frimpong was
looking good but there is very little else to excite meits all so
bloody predictable...Jarvis's runs, the wayward passes, etc etcit
really is rubbsh.
 
I had a feeling Mad Mick would put out an attacking side because of the
QPR result ...for gods sake, that was against ten men...the commentators
focussed on our very attacking lineup right from the start last night,
and we were lucky to get away with conceding five in all honesty.
 
Its probably too late for a replacement to make much difference now, the
damege is done...but what can we do?
 
 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 09:22
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies


When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said:
I always feel I'm the right person to do it. 
I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can
do.
He's said sorry , so that's all right then.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
 
We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch
of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans.
It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few
of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get
before it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated
with a Mick McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is
exactly what is now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure
there will be a positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we
could see to this would be for Morgan to replace him). 
 
Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his
favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield
despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this
position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest
gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity
and willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people
have been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards
but as pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a
shithouse left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there
has to be a mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying
players that he then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when
you buy a payer what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably
makes them worse players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't
manage it he doesn't play them. We have enough talent and variation in
the squad to be able to put out a team that includes graft with a bit of
guile but he insists on a completely 1 dimensional game plan based
around his idea of everybody 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in
the Championship, its not enough in the Premiership.  
 
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
 
I wish we could see Mick's post match interview.
 
On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:



Should have been 6
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
 
sorry, 5 at home.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:




so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at
home?
On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:




Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence
to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 

RE: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-06 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED
Make way for the returning messiah...the one and only Karl Henry.
Seriously though Frimpong was looking like a quality addition, and will
be missed, he could pass the ball well and got stuck in...just our
bloody luck.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 11:53
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season


That can't be right.
The commentators suggested he was laying it on with a giant trowel.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:13 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season
 
http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2012/02/0
6/wolves-loanee-emmanuel-frimpong-out-for-season/ 
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-06 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

You aint knocking our best player are you?...Well he was for about two
weeks.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 12:44
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season


ACL is supposed to be quite painless I believe.  It's only when someone
tries to walk unaided and their leg is wobbling all over the place.
 
Now we know he's a crock, I'm suprised we aren't rushing to sign him
long term.


On 7 February 2012 12:52, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote:


That can't be right.

The commentators suggested he was laying it on with a giant
trowel.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:13 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Frimpong out for season

 


http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2012/02/0
6/wolves-loanee-emmanuel-frimpong-out-for-season/ 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.



-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.



-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] QPR [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-05 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Hanging on for our dear lives against a ten man relegation threatened
team does not fill me with confidence I'm afraid.

Fair enough, we could easily have taken them apart early on but we
didn't and just held on

Not a bad game but we are still sh-ite


-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of paul
Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 02:58
To: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] QPR

What a win! Watched the last 10 mins!
Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra

-Original Message-
From: Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 02:56:51
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] QPR

Sadly yes.



-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 2:38 AM
To: NSWolves
Subject: [NSWolves] QPR

Is anyone else watching this $hite?


Sent from my iPhone

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] QPR [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-05 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Happy with the win BUT definately not the performance...face it...we got
very lucky.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2012 12:18
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] QPR [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Comes to something when you can't even be happy about a win.  What's the
point in even associating yourself with Wolves?  
 
 
 
On 6 February 2012 10:07, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:


UNCLASSIFIED

If Cisse hadn't have been sent off we would have been mullered.

The last ten minutes weren't that enjoyable either.

After they had scored there first goal, I thought to myself why
don't
we score goals like that

Big one next week though, would be nice to drag that lot into
the fight.


-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On

Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2012 08:51
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] QPR


You lucky bastard, can you advise us of your viewing plans for
the next
14 games?
Would be wonderful not to have to sit through vast periods of
pub
football with us barely able to string 3 passes together.




-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of paul

Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 3:58 AM
To: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] QPR

What a win! Watched the last 10 mins!

Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra


-Original Message-
From: Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 02:56:51
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] QPR

Sadly yes.



-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012 2:38 AM
To: NSWolves
Subject: [NSWolves] QPR

Is anyone else watching this $hite?


Sent from my iPhone

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact
the sender and delete the email.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.



-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-01-31 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Doubt if MM is going anywhere.

Terrible time to replace him too, transfer deadline looming. 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of paul
Sent: Wednesday, 1 February 2012 07:09
To: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom

I saw this happening first half.

Good news is this could be MM's last game. 

Will be interesting to see the Crowd's reaction as the game progresses.
Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra

-Original Message-
From: paul  pcr...@contechengineering.com
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:29:17
To: Nsw Wolvesnswolves@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom

How bad are we?

Midfield totally dominated by Liverpool.

Very lucky to be level. MM needs to make some changes at half time or
else we will lose.

Good chance by Kightly just now.
--Original Message--
To: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom
Sent: 22 Jan 2012 13:56

I read Frimpong just had a badly swollen eye, no damage. Where did you
here 3 months Marcus?

--Original Message--
From: Marcus Chantry
Sender: Nsw Wolves
To: Nsw Wolves
ReplyTo: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom
Sent: 22 Jan 2012 13:10

But as Frimpong is out for 3 months we've lost any bite or drive in
midfield.  Atleast we won't have to watch Henry for a few weeks.


On 22/01/2012, at 13:07 , Jeremy Tonks wrote:

 Now that's the Paul Crowe we've all come to know and love!
 
 Situation wouldn't be so bad if Liverpool hadn't rolled over against
Bolton.
 Any chance of the same thing happening in a couple of days?
 QPR looms as a very significant match.
 
 I think I'm glad MM is now forced to 'rest' Henry. Frimpong does 
 indeed look good.
 
 JT
 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of paul
 Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:37 AM
 To: Nsw Wolves
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom
 
 Henry out, fantastic! Frimpong sounds okay. We will win our next 3
games!
 Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au
 Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:26:41
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom
 
 Henry is out for 3 games, Jarvis puts in his best ever cross for a 
 goal and still you're moaning.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
 Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 9:51 AM
 To: NSWolves
 Subject: [NSWolves] 2nd from bottom
 
 I don't care about the fact we played brilliantly in the first half 
 (which we certainly did).  At the end of the day football is a results

 game and yet again we haven't got a result.  We're now 2nd from bottom

 with a worrying gap opening up between us and the safety positions.
 Not looking good at the moment.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Norwich [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-20 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

One of the best games I've seen Wolves involved in for a long time. The
last twenty minutes were edge of your seat stuff.

At half time I was hoping Doyle would come on for Milijas, who was
having an off game, but he improved, and if one of those through balls
had worked out things could have been different.

 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 07:36
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich

What a great match. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 21/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:

 Great delivery from milijas; great header from zubar
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 21/12/2011, at 8:22 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
 
 Or maybe the sub is better paid than the guy he replaced?
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 21/12/2011, at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
 
 Hear the commentators then: master stroke by Lambert. Is he the 
 manager that made the inspired substitution
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 21/12/2011, at 7:36 AM, Chantrys chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:
 
 Good response in the second half of the first half. Let's see how
many halves there are in the second half. 
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 21/12/2011, at 7:32, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote:
 
 Well that was a half of two halves! For the last 20mins we've 
 looked the goods. If only Hunt could hit the side of a barn...
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Chantrys
 Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:27 AM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
 
 Sorry, I meant every time we hoof it it goes to a Norwich player. 
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 21/12/2011, at 7:25, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au
wrote:
 
 Which is it Marcus? Are they playing hoof ball or a poor passing
game?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Chantrys
 Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2011 7:18 AM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Norwich
 
 Im beginning to think that our players are colour blind as they 
 only seem
 to
 be capable of passing the ball to players in green shirts.
 
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 21/12/2011, at 7:10, Chantrys chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:
 
 Ok, anyone watching the game this morning can see clearly as 
 daylight the
 difference a manager can have.  One has a team playing 
 ineffective
 hoof-ball
 whilst the other has his team playing percentage possession 
 football,
 which
 is making the hoof-ball team look very, very ordinary. 
 
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-19 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be,
simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace the dross
they had previoulsyI rest my case.
 
Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal terms
when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to battle
along with MM.
 
Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT the
need for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan in
the face after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping the
gun with the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I
understand the timing aspect re the economy..I blame Mick for the
way we play...its horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the
championship more.
 
 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew


I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested
http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061

Here's some more interesting data in the table below.

League rank is the position that the team finished in the league
Wage rank is the position forecast by wages

You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league position. 
10 teams are within one position of their prediction. 
15 teams are within two positions of their prediction
18 teams are within three positions of their prediction.

I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference between
the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones that
seemingly outperformed their resources.

You'll notice all the good managers are near the top of the list:
Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - McCARTHY

The way I see if you can say that either management is important and
Mick is a good manager or management is unimportant.  

There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a bad
manager because the facts don't support it.

Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference 
West Brom..11..198 
Fulham8...11.. ..3 
Stoke13...15.. ..2 
Spurs..57. ...2 
Man Utd..13... ..2 
Wolves..17...18... .1 
Blackpool...19...20... .1 
Arsenal...4.5. ...1 
Everton..7.8.. ..1 
Wigan...16...16... .0 
Newcastle..12...12 0 
Bolton...14...14.. ..0 
Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 
Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 
Man City.3.2.. .-1 
Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 
Sunderland.108 -2 
Aston villa...9.6...-3 
Blackburn...15...12... -3 
West Ham..208...-12


On 19 December 2011 15:03, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com
wrote:


Hughes's Granny would be better than MM!

 

Maybe we should just enlist a local Gypsy  as replacement for
MM, as our teams performance depends on luck and other dubiously
explained factors, nothing at all to do with the Manager and his
coaching skills?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 2:52 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew



 

Hold the front page.  What a scoop!

On 19 December 2011 11:09, Paul Hart wholiga...@gmail.com
wrote:

I spoke to my mate last night in Penn he heard Hughes was there.


 

Well just have to wait and see.

Sent from my iPhone


On 19/12/2011, at 11:05 AM, Steven Millward
millward@gmail.com wrote:

He dared to make a 

RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-19 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

There lies the problem because first the Baggies and now Sunderland have
nicked the obvious candidates...we have dithered too much


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:13
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



You raise good points Lee but you fail in the usual way... just who is
it that is going to replace MM?

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:09 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be,
simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace the dross
they had previoulsyI rest my case.

 

Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal terms
when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to battle
along with MM.

 

Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT the
need for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan in
the face after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping the
gun with the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I
understand the timing aspect re the economy..I blame Mick for the
way we play...its horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the
championship more.

 

 

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew

I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested
http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061

Here's some more interesting data in the table below.

League rank is the position that the team finished in the league
Wage rank is the position forecast by wages

You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league position. 
10 teams are within one position of their prediction. 
15 teams are within two positions of their prediction
18 teams are within three positions of their prediction.

I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference between
the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones that
seemingly outperformed their resources.

You'll notice all the good managers are near the top of the list:
Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - McCARTHY

The way I see if you can say that either management is important and
Mick is a good manager or management is unimportant.  

There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a bad
manager because the facts don't support it.

Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference 
West Brom..11..198 
Fulham8...11.. ..3 
Stoke13...15.. ..2 
Spurs..57. ...2 
Man Utd..13... ..2 
Wolves..17...18... .1 
Blackpool...19...20... .1 
Arsenal...4.5. ...1 
Everton..7.8.. ..1 
Wigan...16...16... .0 
Newcastle..12...12 0 
Bolton...14...14.. ..0 
Chelsea..2.1.. .-1 
Birmingham.18...17 ..-1 
Man City.3.2.. .-1 
Liverpool.6.4. ..-2 
Sunderland.108 -2 
Aston villa...9.6...-3 
Blackburn...15...12... -3 
West Ham..208...-12

On 19 December 2011 15:03, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com
wrote:

Hughes's Granny would be better than MM!

 

Maybe we should just enlist a local Gypsy  as replacement for MM, as our
teams performance depends on luck and other dubiously explained factors,
nothing at all to do with the Manager and his coaching

[NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-19 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Whilst on the subject of statistics, did anyone else see the Karl Henry
stats on Mol Mix?
 
Are these stats too much of a coincidence
 
 
2010-2011 - With Karl Henry
P28 ( + 1 sub )
W7 ( 21 points )
D6 ( 6 points )
L16
Pts: 27
 
2010-2011 - Without Karl Henry
P9 
W4 ( 12 points )
D1 ( 1 point )
L4
Pts: 13 points


2011-2012 - With Karl Henry
P 14 
W3 ( 9 points )
D2 ( 2 points )
L9
Pts: 11

2011-2012 - Without Karl Henry
P1 
W1 ( 3 points )
Pts: 3
 
 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:21
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



I'm not going to put Sunderland in that basket for a few more weeks
yet...

...and the wages statistics still tell me that Sh*te will fall on their
collective backsides sooner rather than later :-)

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:15 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

There lies the problem because first the Baggies and now Sunderland have
nicked the obvious candidates...we have dithered too much

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:13
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

You raise good points Lee but you fail in the usual way... just who is
it that is going to replace MM?

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:09 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be,
simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace the dross
they had previoulsyI rest my case.

 

Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal terms
when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to battle
along with MM.

 

Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT the
need for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan in
the face after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping the
gun with the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I
understand the timing aspect re the economy..I blame Mick for the
way we play...its horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the
championship more.

 

 

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew

I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested
http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061

Here's some more interesting data in the table below.

League rank is the position that the team finished in the league
Wage rank is the position forecast by wages

You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league position. 
10 teams are within one position of their prediction. 
15 teams are within two positions of their prediction
18 teams are within three positions of their prediction.

I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference between
the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones that
seemingly outperformed their resources.

You'll notice all the good managers are near the top of the list:
Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - McCARTHY

The way I see if you can say that either management is important and
Mick is a good manager or management is unimportant.  

There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a bad
manager because the facts don't support it.

Team..League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference 
West Brom

RE: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-19 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Thats right, lets have our own poll then.
 
For MM = Against MM  (I'm against but only if a suitable replacement is
available)
 
Should Henry be our first choice defensive midfielder = Should we sign
someone specifically to replace him (I think we need someone better in
his position)
 
I also happen to believe we desperately need another quality striker.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:40
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Stats can be made to support any agenda that a person wants to push.
Climate Change is the perfect example of how both sides can manipulate
statistics to support their own agenda.  


On 20/12/2011, at 08:36 , Jeremy Tonks wrote:


You've missed the point Lee ;)



How much is he being paid?



I'm not sure 1 game without him this season gives us any
statistical validity?!

I think I'd like to see which games he missed (as in opponents)
as well.









From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:30 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



UNCLASSIFIED

Whilst on the subject of statistics, did anyone else see the
Karl Henry stats on Mol Mix?



Are these stats too much of a coincidence





2010-2011 - With Karl Henry
P28 ( + 1 sub )
W7 ( 21 points )
D6 ( 6 points )
L16
Pts: 27



2010-2011 - Without Karl Henry
P9 
W4 ( 12 points )
D1 ( 1 point )
L4
Pts: 13 points


2011-2012 - With Karl Henry
P 14 
W3 ( 9 points )
D2 ( 2 points )
L9
Pts: 11

2011-2012 - Without Karl Henry
P1 
W1 ( 3 points )
Pts: 3







IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:21
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

I'm not going to put Sunderland in that basket for a few more
weeks yet...

...and the wages statistics still tell me that Sh*te will fall
on their collective backsides sooner rather than later :-)









From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:15 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



UNCLASSIFIED

There lies the problem because first the Baggies and now
Sunderland have nicked the obvious candidates...we have dithered too
much



IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:13
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

You raise good points Lee but you fail in the usual way... just
who is it that is going to replace MM?









From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:09 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



UNCLASSIFIED

So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they
should be, simply because they found a bloody good manager

RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I went to bed at half time, totally exhausted but content. Our team
certain know how to know the stuffing out of us.

 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 02:36
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?

Bad scoreline now and we're creating nothing. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 18/12/2011, at 3:03 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:

 Good scoreline but quality of game could be better, especially the
crossing.   Fletcher hasn't been in the game which is surprising. 
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Apparrantly the fans left him alone this week. 

My season ticket holding mate seems to think many fans are resigned to
the fact that his job is safe, but that can change very quickly. 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Hart
Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 06:55
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?

Did MM get any abuse ? 

Sent from my iPhone

On 18/12/2011, at 4:22 AM, paul  pcr...@contechengineering.com
wrote:

 At least Doyle scored.
 
 Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra
 
 -Original Message-
 From: mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com
 Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:05:48
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?
 
 Passing is atrocious. Henry needs to stop the 50 yard speculative 
 passes that go straight to Stoke players. Even the short easy passes 
 are going to their players.
 
 Stoke are the dirtiest team in the league. Nasty tackles, elbows, 
 shoving, etc even makes Berra look ok. I hope McCarthy calls them for 
 who they really are. And the tactics won them the match in the 2nd
half.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
 Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 2:36 AM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?
 
 Bad scoreline now and we're creating nothing. 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 18/12/2011, at 3:03 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
 
 Good scoreline but quality of game could be better, especially the
 crossing.   Fletcher hasn't been in the game which is surprising. 
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.
 
 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

To be fair, Steve Morgan needs to address the situation too. 
 
Wolves perfromances on the pitch have shown little or no improvement,
the manager has to be responsible for that.
 
The big fear for me is, we change managers and still get relegated, and
so it all starts again.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 08:35
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Anyone read Soccernomics?  I've read extracts but I've just ordered it.
The author says that 90% of Premier league position is down to wages.

I really don't understand why Mick is the scapegoat.  He has the fourth
cheapest wage bill and the team is fourth from bottom.  

If the fans really cared they'd offer to pay double the season ticket
price to fund better players.

Hmmm.



On 19 December 2011 09:04, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com
wrote:


Spoke to me Dad last night, who is a season ticket holder in the
Steve Bull,
apparently Tuesday night against Norwich could be the last
chance saloon
game for MM. He reckons another loss would see the fans turn
against him on
mass!

Paul Crowe
Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
 
ConTech (Sydney Office)
 
PO Box 3517
Rhodes Waterside
Rhodes NSW  2138
Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
Mob: 0406009562
Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Website: www.contechengineering.com


-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf

Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 8:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

UNCLASSIFIED

Apparrantly the fans left him alone this week.

My season ticket holding mate seems to think many fans are
resigned to
the fact that his job is safe, but that can change very quickly.

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Hart
Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 06:55
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?

Did MM get any abuse ?

Sent from my iPhone

On 18/12/2011, at 4:22 AM, paul 
pcr...@contechengineering.com
wrote:

 At least Doyle scored.

 Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra

 -Original Message-
 From: mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com
 Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:05:48
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?

 Passing is atrocious. Henry needs to stop the 50 yard
speculative
 passes that go straight to Stoke players. Even the short easy
passes
 are going to their players.

 Stoke are the dirtiest team in the league. Nasty tackles,
elbows,
 shoving, etc even makes Berra look ok. I hope McCarthy calls
them for
 who they really are. And the tactics won them the match in the
2nd
half.


 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
 Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 2:36 AM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?

 Bad scoreline now and we're creating nothing.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On 18/12/2011, at 3:03 AM, Marcus Chantry
chant...@iinet.net.au
wrote:

 Good scoreline but quality of game could be better,
especially the
 crossing.   Fletcher hasn't been in the game which is
surprising.


 Sent from my iPhone

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact
the sender

RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Well in my opinion, Mick's team isn't good enough. Mick's tactics aren't
good enough.  I and I think many many others think Mick is out of his
depth in the PL.
 
Who knows, our squad may be capable of much more under a better manager.
Its also possible that Mick has got this bunch punching well above there
weight and they will be even worse with another managerwe just don't
know, there lies the risk.
 
What I do know is, the team should be showing more improvement, the
squad should have been stregthened more. We all shudder everytime Mick
says he doesn't need to sign more / better players because he's happy
with his squad.
 
Its Mick's fault we are not improving. Thats the bottom line. 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 09:01
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


How can I explain this more clearly.

90% of the results are down to the quality of players
We have the fourth worst players in the league.
We have no right to finish above where we currently sit
If we look bad in matches it's because we are playing against better
players

Why do you keep saying its all Mick's fault?



On 19 December 2011 09:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:




UNCLASSIFIED

To be fair, Steve Morgan needs to address the situation too. 
 
Wolves perfromances on the pitch have shown little or no
improvement, the manager has to be responsible for that.
 
The big fear for me is, we change managers and still get
relegated, and so it all starts again.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 08:35
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Anyone read Soccernomics?  I've read extracts but I've just
ordered it.  The author says that 90% of Premier league position is down
to wages.

I really don't understand why Mick is the scapegoat.  He has the
fourth cheapest wage bill and the team is fourth from bottom.  

If the fans really cared they'd offer to pay double the season
ticket price to fund better players.

Hmmm.



On 19 December 2011 09:04, Paul Crowe
pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:


Spoke to me Dad last night, who is a season ticket
holder in the Steve Bull,
apparently Tuesday night against Norwich could be the
last chance saloon
game for MM. He reckons another loss would see the fans
turn against him on
mass!

Paul Crowe
Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
 
ConTech (Sydney Office)
 
PO Box 3517
Rhodes Waterside
Rhodes NSW  2138
Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
Mob: 0406009562
Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Website: www.contechengineering.com


-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf

Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 8:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

UNCLASSIFIED

Apparrantly the fans left him alone this week.

My season ticket holding mate seems to think many fans
are resigned to
the fact that his job is safe, but that can change very
quickly.

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Hart
Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 06:55
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching?

Did MM get any abuse ?

Sent

RE: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic) [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-13 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I did wonder what had happened.  A man could die of thirst.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2011 13:01
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic)


Hi Paul, 

we all missed out on the Banks's order as the importer in Perth decided
to give it all to a shop in Perth rather than send it to us over here in
Sydney.  He claims that the next shipment in Jan/Feb will be sent to us
in Sydney, but I'm not holding my breath after the last 2 failures.

On 14/12/2011, at 07:03 , Paul Hart wrote:


Hooray I'm working now !

Does that mean I missed out on the Bankss order ?

Do you have any left Marcus ?


Sent from my iPhone

On 13/12/2011, at 8:48 PM, Marcus Chantry
chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:



it is also blocking Matt Leese, perhaps he's coming up
as an Everton fan. 

On 13/12/2011, at 20:15 , Jeremy Tonks wrote:




Steve's artificially intelligent spam filter has
evidently flagged you automatically as a Spurs supporter :-(





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 8:11 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic)



They are getting flagged as spam.  I had to post
it manually.  You should be OK from now on.

On 13 December 2011 18:32, Paul Hart
wholiga...@gmail.com wrote:

I always bet against the wolves then it's always
win win  I was at the last gathering . The bold head with my wife . I
hope to make it to the next one Marcus ... Dont know if these emails are
getting through as I ordered some bank s  ale with no relpy  up the
wolves
 Please respond ... Anybody


Sent from my iPhone


On 13/12/2011, at 6:05 PM, Marcus Chantry
chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:

 I've been betting against Wolves all season
and it's had stuff all effect. (it's cost me a lot of money though)


 On 13/12/2011, at 15:11 , Jeremy Tonks wrote:

 Leave him alone Steven... I'm hoping he'll
start tipping against Wolves.

 -Original Message-
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
 Of Steven Millward
 Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 3:03 PM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Man City (off topic)

 Not like you to be wrong about a football
matter Marcus.

 Ohhang on a minute

 On 13/12/2011, at 7:30 AM, Chantrys
chant...@iinet.net.au wrote:

 Watching Man City against Chelsea at the
moment and the way that City are
 playing Chelsea off the park I really can't
see anyone stopping City. Their
 passing at the moment is Barcelona-esque.
Very very impressive, but I guess
 they've spent a couple of pounds to get the
team capable of playing like
 that.

 Where's our Shiek?


 Sent from my iPad

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 --
 Boo! Thick Mick Out.

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.



-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


 

RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-05 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Who'd have thought Ward and Craddock would be such important players for
us?
 
Who'd have thought Doyle would be almost ineffective after so much
promise?
 
Who'd have thought Fletch would be our twenty a season man?
 
Who'd have thought Edwards would replace Henry and we'd start winning
games again? ME 
 
Who'd have thought Zubar would make the difference? One of our more
flamboyant players.
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 07:16
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!!



No worries now Steve, MM has been given a 3m war chest! With his
undoubted superior talent for finding a bargain we should be safe.

 

You still sure about that carton of beer bet? 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com 

Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com 

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-12-05 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I am amazed that it does actually appear like there could be three or
even more  teams worse than us this year. 
 
I honestly didn't think that was the case a couple of weeks ago.
 
 

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 08:48
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



Absolutely correct Rog - but our GEM is the best available and (somehow)
he is doing the job!

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 9:25 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 8:23 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!! [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

Who'd have thought Ward and Craddock would be such important players for
us? 

Certainly not our GEM who sent the latter out on loan.

 

Who'd have thought Doyle would be almost ineffective after so much
promise?

Not our GEM

 

Who'd have thought Fletch would be our twenty a season man?

Not our GEM who hardly played him because he never ran around like a
headless chook.

 

Who'd have thought Edwards would replace Henry and we'd start winning
games again? ME

Not our GEM

 

Who'd have thought Zubar would make the difference? One of our more
flamboyant players.

Not our GEM as he's no ing idea what flamboyant means.

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 07:16
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Safe as houses!!

No worries now Steve, MM has been given a 3m war chest! With his
undoubted superior talent for finding a bargain we should be safe.

 

You still sure about that carton of beer bet? 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-11-30 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Its like turning back the clock five months, except we are in much worse
shape now the one big hope signing has so far been a flop.
 
Thats a wish list most had last July.
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 12:47
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland



Steve, the more I think about this the more I believe some shrewd
business in the January transfer window will be the factor.

 

Whichever teams in and around us do the best business in January will
stay up.

 

So, who would you like to see us buy in the New Year?

 

My wish list, apart from a new Manager, is:

 

1.   Left Back

2.   Creative Midfielder who can also defend (to replace Henry)

3.   Centre Half

4.   Centre forward / Inside forward - someone like Solksjaer who
can come on as sub and score a goal or change the game 

 

We probably need 2 x midfielder's as Milijas will be sold along with
Hammil.

 

The problem is if we are in the bottom 3 come January who will want to
join us? 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 11:56 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Sunnerland

 

Be interesing to see where Sunderland end up this season relative to
Wolves, and whether a new manager solves their problem.  Supposedly it
should.

 



 

On 1 December 2011 11:12, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote:

2 wins in the last 10?

That's even better than our greatest ever manager.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 9:59 AM 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland

 

It will be interesting to see if Sunderland had a new Manager already
lined up? If so, no reason, why he can't take charge for Sunday's game.

 

I lived in Newcastle for a couple of years and used to go to Roker Park
whenever Newcastle played away. Sunderland fans are some of the best
going and generally speaking back the Manager religiously. However, if
you go on their various forums the overwhelming opinion was for Bruce to
go asap! Basically 2 wins in 10 games just not good enough.

 

A very similar record to our beloved MM. I wonder if the other M's have
a plan if Sunday's game is a disaster? Teams that sack their Manager
always seem to win the next game.  

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/


 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 9:44 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Sunnerland

 

What are you saying Rog? Should they let us have it as a walkover?

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 8:48 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Sunnerland

 

The cheeky buggers.

They think they can beat us without a manager.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.


RE: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-11-21 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I agree, Ward has improved, and is a very valuable team member...
not sure that the others have actually improved much ..
Jarvis was just as inconsistant when I saw him two years ago, I believe
his form has declined lately.
Fletcher looked good from the start when he was given an opportunity 
Hennessey -yes I'd agree there
Henry - Holding midfielder? seriously
Stearman - depends which games you have watched, he has been hopeless at
times.
Edwards - Not really sure until I see him have an extended run
 
O'hara does look skillful but those stary passes ...frustrating
Hunt - similar to O'hara ...workhorse, valuable player
Johnson - Not impressed
Doyle - ineffective goal scorer, is that what he is?? I really don't
know. Could be brilliant with an effective front two, if he stayed
upright a little longer.
 
 
 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 22 November 2011 07:11
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from? [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Ward (excellent player all round).
Jarvis (league 1 to England squad).
Fletcher (best striker at our club)
Henessey (from reserve to excellent 1st choice keeper)
Henry (very good holding midfielder)
Stearman (much more confident and able at right back)
Edwards (deserves a place in a PL team having not been good enough for a
championship team in the early days)
 
Ones who are about the same (perhaps at the limit of their ability)
Hunt
Johnson
Doyle
O'Hara
 
In my view all of our championship team have stepped up and improved.
It's the new signings by and large that aren't improving any more
 
 


 
On 22 November 2011 08:03, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:




UNCLASSIFIED

Just as a matter of interest, who do we think has actually
improved under Mick and his crew's coaching? 
 
Berra? 
 
I admit we are playing the ball around much better these days,
but the finished product is non existant, we are woefully short of
creative ideas and GOALS...isn't this exactly what we all thought
Milijas was most capable of improving?.
 
Better get used to it, because all the signs are that there will
be no changes in the foreseable future.
 
 
 
 
 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 21 November 2011 14:50
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from?


From what I've seen he's a very talented, creative midfielder.
Better vision than anyone else in our squad and the player most likely
to 'make things happen' from a central midfield position. I think the
problem is that Mick has tried to turn him into something that he's not
(ie a grafter) and so he is no able to play his 'natural' game. For our
first season in the Prem I was prepared to accept that we were right up
against it with the squad we had and the sort of players we would be
able to attract in order to strengthen the squad, and would therefore
need to 'graft' to make ourselves hard to beat and nick a few results.
Stoke did exactly that in their first season but have gradually built
year on year from there, transforming their squad and the type of
football they play. I don't see us doing the same - Mick still wants a
team of grafters and seems prepared to put a willingness to 'die for the
cause' ahead of ability. I think we need a mix of graft and guile, but
then I'm not the manager and so my thoughts count for nothing when it
comes to the team that gets picked each week. 
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 21 November 2011 1:29 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Which planet is he from?


He's another one of these players like Freddy and that homesick
Dutchman.  The fans think he's better than he really is.  It's been a
theme on Mol Mix for many months that he's fallen out with Mick etc but
I just don't think he's that good.
 
Even if he's had enough, he would surely still do as well as
possible to put himself in the shop

[NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-10-03 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Maybe the believers are starting not to believe.
 
So The Mad Mick Out campaign re commences.
 
It may not even be Macarthy's fault that we didn't strengthen further,
if thats the case, it would be nice to know who makes these brilliant
decisions.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-10-03 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Have we ever stopped saying that?
 
I think it was pointed out after we struggled to beat Blackburn.
 
If they can spend money on stadium improvemnets that aren't required,
they should be able to find money for players that are obvioulsy
required.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2011 09:04
To: nswolves
Subject: Fwd: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]


I see we are back to we should have bought more quality players.  I'm
still waiting for someone to say where the money should be coming from.
It's been nearly six months now and nobody has explained it to me.
 

 
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Millward millward@gmail.com
Date: 23 May 2011 09:25
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com



We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who thinks we don't need
serious strengthening is kidding themselves.
 
Some real quality is needed, we paid big money...
 
Agreed.  It would be great to improve the side.  Your suggestion is that
we spend big money to do it.  So who's going to put the money up?  You?
Or are you suggesting that we borrow the money?  And what about wages,
should we borrow to pay those too?  I'm still dying to hear some
constructive analysis about how the club should change the way it is run
cause I'm not hearing much except buy more expensive players.
 
 

 
On 23 May 2011 09:01, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


I'm very happy we have stayed up, but as I said to a mate last
night, we can't keep going through this every year. 
 
Elokobi is an awesome Guy, loves our club to bits and has
improved out of site over the last couple of years, and I hope he keeps
improving. I'm just not sure he is good enough yet
 
Henry is definately not, he panicked every time he got given the
ball last night, was wreckless in the challenge, and lucky not to cost
us either by being sent off or giving stupid free kicks away.
 
We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who thinks we
don't need serious strengthening is kidding themselves.
 
Some real quality is needed, we paid big money for Doyle, who
kept us up last year and big money for Fletcher and Hunt, who were both
keys to us finally staying up this year. 
 
So no coincidence that serious money needs to be spent to make a
serious difference.
 
 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 08:46
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]



Hunt was magnificent today, his terrier, never say die work
ethic turned the tide for us second half and what a goal to cap his
performance of with!!

 

Wish list for next season:

 

Left Back

Centre Half

O'Hara

Centre midfielder

Striker

 

I can see the likes of Milijas, Ebanks-Blake, Elokobi and Henry
(please God) being moved on in the Summer to generate funds for new
signings. Still think Milijas has something to offer us but MM doesn't
see it so best to move him on. Can't see Morgan getting rid of MM after
keeping us up, huge call if he does. It will be interesting to see who
replaces Clipboard? Maybe this new guy will have an impact on tactics /
team selection? 

 

Very enjoyable season in the end, 11 wins and a couple more
points than last year, just wish we could be more consistent.

 

Marcus's how about starting at that same Pub we went to last
year? Better beer than Royal North Shore!



Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 8:00 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]

 

Not you.  Marcus lost the bet.  He's on our side now.

 

But to be honest, I'm sick of hearing the club I love get bashed
week in week out.  Why don't you

RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-10-03 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Why don't we sit somewhere in the middle then?
A little less on the stadium and more on players.
Is this more about Morgan's long term business plan or Wolves on field
success?
Personally I think its a very dangerous game that we are playing, hardly
strengthening a team that barely survived relegation last year cannot be
anything other than a big risk
 
 
 


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2011 13:10
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Some people have stopped saying it.  I assume Wolves is run like any
other business that needs to break even or make a profit to avoid the
risk of going bust.  We have the best run business in the league.
Unfortunately that is not consistent with having the best team' in the
league in the short term.  In the long term, it should pay off as we
don't have a load of debt to suck resources from the football budget.
 
Arsenal have cleared out a lot of players as they can't afford the wages
anymore.  The football world is starting to turn.  There are plenty of
clubs that are heading towards real financial trouble with the level of
debt they are carrying.
 
Whether the stadium expansion was a good idea is the only question here.
I can only assume that the business plan was sound in that it gavea
stream of money over the long term that could be used for football
purposes whereas spending money on players and wages is a short term fix
that catches up in the end


On 4 October 2011 10:57, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:




UNCLASSIFIED

Have we ever stopped saying that?
 
I think it was pointed out after we struggled to beat Blackburn.
 
If they can spend money on stadium improvemnets that aren't
required, they should be able to find money for players that are
obvioulsy required.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2011 09:04
To: nswolves
Subject: Fwd: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]


I see we are back to we should have bought more quality
players.  I'm still waiting for someone to say where the money should
be coming from.  It's been nearly six months now and nobody has
explained it to me.
 

 
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Millward millward@gmail.com
Date: 23 May 2011 09:25
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com



We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who thinks we
don't need serious strengthening is kidding themselves.
 
Some real quality is needed, we paid big money...
 
Agreed.  It would be great to improve the side.  Your suggestion
is that we spend big money to do it.  So who's going to put the money
up?  You?  Or are you suggesting that we borrow the money?  And what
about wages, should we borrow to pay those too?  I'm still dying to hear
some constructive analysis about how the club should change the way it
is run cause I'm not hearing much except buy more expensive players.
 
 

 
On 23 May 2011 09:01, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


I'm very happy we have stayed up, but as I said to a
mate last night, we can't keep going through this every year. 
 
Elokobi is an awesome Guy, loves our club to bits and
has improved out of site over the last couple of years, and I hope he
keeps improving. I'm just not sure he is good enough yet
 
Henry is definately not, he panicked every time he got
given the ball last night, was wreckless in the challenge, and lucky not
to cost us either by being sent off or giving stupid free kicks away.
 
We have the basis of a decent team, but anyone who
thinks we don't need serious strengthening is kidding themselves.
 
Some real quality is needed, we paid big money for
Doyle, who kept us up last year and big money for Fletcher and Hunt, who
were both keys to us finally staying up

[NSWolves] No Comment [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-10-02 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

No deedback about Saturday's game?
 
I was away and didn't watch, so will not comment on the performance.
 
Seems like the natives are getting very restless though.
 
I do not agree with booing players or cheering the substitution of any
Wolves player, Wolves fans are notoriously fickle like that, and it
seems like more and more are seeing Karl Henry as one of our very big
weak links.
 
Any thoughts? Is Mad Mick safe?

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Bin dippers [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-09-25 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

You can say we should have or could have all season, we could
still go down...lol. 

Overall, thought we played well but the damage was done in the first
half, due to individual errors, and based on the way we turned the game
around after making changes I'd say managerial decisions too.

I'll eat humble pie and say Henry played wellmuch more defensively,
which is where he should be.

Doyle just not cutting the mustard anymore for me. How many times does
he score? A lot less than how many times he falls on his arse.

Doherty was impressive, nice and steady.

Still a couple of quality players short. Wonder if Macfadden can score
the goals Doyle doesn't??



-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 25 September 2011 07:47
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Bin dippers

First game I've watched for a while. One all would have been fair. I
don't think we should fear anyone anymore. Doherty looked terrified as
he was waiting to come on. Seems like a long time since we've had anyone
from the academy hitting the first team. 

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-09-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

We are now being caught out, let the struggle commence.

We are woeful in midfield, only partly due to Henry being out of his
depth, O'Hara isn't exactly setting the world on fire either..If a team
nulifies our wing threat we are in trouble every time.   We also need a
quality striker.

As I said after Blackburn (the result which gave a lot of people a false
sense of security)we really had to bring in more than one player during
the off season...and we didn't. Mick and Co are deluded if they thought
/ think the squad we have is sufficient for anything other than a
relegation scrap.

Woeful stuff

 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 15:00
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves]

I'm not a huge fan of Joey Barton (insert stronger language here) but he
does seem to know a thing or two about 'Kelvin' Henry.

JT

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 2:08 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]

I wish I could tell you how very very bad Henry was, but I'd be accused
of simply picking on him because I don't like him. Let's just say that
Barton probably wasn't wide of the mark when he called Henry a sunday
league player. 


- Original Message -
From: paul  [mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 01:56 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]

Just seen the goals, Elekobi at fault for the first one. Changes next
week, how bad was Henry Marcus?
Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra

-Original Message-
From: Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:17:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] 

Can't wait to hear the happy clapper explanation for the opening 20
minutes.
Anyone watching?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-09-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Very poor performance, very poor crowd and all played out in front of
the three M's. 

I bet Morgan wonders why he's plopughing all that money into the
stadium. 

I thought we'd be selling out with the reduced capacity.

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 19 September 2011 07:07
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

It will actually do us some good Jarvis being booed repeatedly for his
crap wasted crosses. They have been frequently crap for a long time, and
no-one except the fans seem to notice it. Hopefully he knows now and
will do something about it.

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 19 September 2011 7:03 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

UNCLASSIFIED

We are now being caught out, let the struggle commence.

We are woeful in midfield, only partly due to Henry being out of his
depth, O'Hara isn't exactly setting the world on fire either..If a team
nulifies our wing threat we are in trouble every time.   We also need a
quality striker.

As I said after Blackburn (the result which gave a lot of people a false
sense of security)we really had to bring in more than one player during
the off season...and we didn't. Mick and Co are deluded if they thought
/ think the squad we have is sufficient for anything other than a
relegation scrap.

Woeful stuff

 

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 15:00
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves]

I'm not a huge fan of Joey Barton (insert stronger language here) but he
does seem to know a thing or two about 'Kelvin' Henry.

JT

-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011 2:08 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]

I wish I could tell you how very very bad Henry was, but I'd be accused
of simply picking on him because I don't like him. Let's just say that
Barton probably wasn't wide of the mark when he called Henry a sunday
league player. 


- Original Message -
From: paul  [mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 01:56 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]

Just seen the goals, Elekobi at fault for the first one. Changes next
week, how bad was Henry Marcus?
Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra

-Original Message-
From: Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:17:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] 

Can't wait to hear the happy clapper explanation for the opening 20
minutes.
Anyone watching?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-09-11 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I really think the Spurs game highlighted Henry's inadequcies more than
ever. He doesn't look up to the same level as the rest of our team never
mind a classy side like Spurs. The ball comes to him too quickly and it
looks to me as if he doesn't know what to do with it most of the time.
Good crack at goal though, can't fault that bit of play.

We need quality in his position asap. 

Thought we looked very good for twenty minutes or so in the first half,
the best I've seen us play (I think). Then we went through a spell where
nobody seemed to want the ball, wonder which influential midfielder's
tactics have rubbed off there?

We are so close to being a very decent side but I'll say it again, our
reluctance to strengthen will be the difference between a relegation
scrap and a comfortable mid table position.

Thought Doyle played fantastic in the first half, couldn't fault the
defence either. Ward continues to impress, and to my total surprise so
does Berra.  Johnson has made a huge difference there I think.

We look so much better when Foley comes on. Give him a start instead of
Henry.



-Original Message-
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Sunday, 11 September 2011 01:11
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] 

How many more times in a game can henry get caught in possession?  He is
a joke!

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

--
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


[NSWolves] No Transfers [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-31 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Maybe something is possible in that respect then


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2011 08:42
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] No Transfers [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Can't you still get loan players outside of the window ?



On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:




UNCLASSIFIED

So while everyone around us strengthens prior to the transfer
deadline, complecency sets in partly in my opinion because we have had
three reasonable results so far this season.
 
Hopefully we won't be regretting this in a few weeks time, and
my concerns prove unfounded.
 
 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.




-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

The winning habit is a good thing, roll on Villa.some of our fringe
players weren't that impressive according to reports, or are Wolves fans
starting to expect excellence...lol 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 08:43
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run?



Only one downside... Sh*te went through as well.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:42 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Cup run?

 

Who'd've thunk it. Only a few weeks ago we'd have been 'chorley
concerned' about a cup fixture like Nants...

...but even with a second string side I wasn't expecting any problems. 

 

There's a good feeling around the club for some reason ;)

JT

-- 



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I'd rather hear that than the usual we can concentrate on the league
now after being knocked out.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 09:36
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



Good grief!! The second string win 4 - 0 away from home and people are
still not happy!!

 

Typical fickle Wolves fans, why do they bother following us?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:54 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

The winning habit is a good thing, roll on Villa.some of our fringe
players weren't that impressive according to reports, or are Wolves fans
starting to expect excellence...lol 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 08:43
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run?

Only one downside... Sh*te went through as well.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:42 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Cup run?

 

Who'd've thunk it. Only a few weeks ago we'd have been 'chorley
concerned' about a cup fixture like Nants...

...but even with a second string side I wasn't expecting any problems. 

 

There's a good feeling around the club for some reason ;)

JT

-- 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Interesting discussion on Molineux Mix about Man City. 
 
Give me the ups and downs of Wolves any day of the week. The joys of
winning the one off  big game rather than expectations of winning
everything.
 
What's happening at Man City is totally wrong, they are ruining the
game. I'd love to see them finish teh season empty handed, but I doubt
that will happen.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 09:55
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Yeah, its easy to just criticise week in week out. Success in football
is fleeting at best, even for the top clubs. I remember mates when I was
in the UK back in the 80s, who were Liverpool fans,  feeling dejected
because they'd only won 2 cups that season. Pure greed. Life is too
short to not enjoy a good run or victory while it lasts, cause we know
it won't for long. Its about time fans really gave MM some credit for
the great job he's already done, like the club has, and is still doing,
instead of turning on him as soon as a few results go against us.


On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Paul Crowe
pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:


Good grief!! The second string win 4 - 0 away from home and
people are still not happy!!

 

Typical fickle Wolves fans, why do they bother following us?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636 tel:02%2097396636   Fax: 02 97396542
tel:02%2097396542 

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:54 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

The winning habit is a good thing, roll on Villa.some of our
fringe players weren't that impressive according to reports, or are
Wolves fans starting to expect excellence...lol 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 08:43
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Cup run?

Only one downside... Sh*te went through as well.





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 8:42 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Cup run?

 

Who'd've thunk it. Only a few weeks ago we'd have been 'chorley
concerned' about a cup fixture like Nants...

...but even with a second string side I wasn't expecting any
problems. 

 

There's a good feeling around the club for some reason ;)

JT

-- 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-22 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I think 'superb is a little bit of an exageration. Superb  for Henry
maybe?


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 19:38
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Funny you both say that when Henry was reported to have been superb last
night.  Did you think he was rubbish or is it just dogma?


On 22 August 2011 09:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:




UNCLASSIFIED

I'd agree with that. Foley is a much better player than Henry.
Not sure we need him to push forward too much with our current team but
more so than Henry.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 09:05 

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



I reckon Foley should replace Henry.  Has performs the defensive
side of the role better than Henry and has more natural instinct to get
forward as well.

 

That would be the only change I'd make to the team at the
moment.  Ward was great last night, nearly 50% of Jarvis' crosses found
a Wolves player, Doyle stayed on his feet for a good portion of the
game.  Happy times indeed.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:42 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

Credit where credit is due, they played very well. Very
impressive.

 

Even the usual targets like Berra and to a lesser extent Henry
played well.

 

I thought Jarvis was outstanding, and O'hara was much better, he
still gave the ball away a few times but maybe this is because he's got
such a good footballing brain.doesn't mind a shot does he...

 

Hunt is starting to really impress, he'd be a nightmare to play
againstsimilar to O'hara...likesa  shot and is sometimes ahead of
the others with his forward play.

 

Fletcher and Doyle also complimenting each other.

 

Its a tricky one but I thought we looked better with Foley on
the pitch...where could you fit him in though?

 

Much better, Fulham looked good at times in the first half and I
thought they'd really test us, very sharp play, but they had no answer
after we had taken the lead.could have been a big win

 

Roll on VillaI was even hoping that Bolton and Man City
would draw so we could stay toplol

 

Another win against Villa and I'm converted

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 08:32
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Best start

Two wins from two.

Hentry and Jarvis playing well.

Playing 442.

 

Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today?

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the
information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies.
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached
files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not
reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager




-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-21 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Credit where credit is due, they played very well. Very impressive.
 
Even the usual targets like Berra and to a lesser extent Henry played
well.
 
I thought Jarvis was outstanding, and O'hara was much better, he still
gave the ball away a few times but maybe this is because he's got such a
good footballing brain.doesn't mind a shot does he...
 
Hunt is starting to really impress, he'd be a nightmare to play
againstsimilar to O'hara...likesa  shot and is sometimes ahead of
the others with his forward play.
 
Fletcher and Doyle also complimenting each other.
 
Its a tricky one but I thought we looked better with Foley on the
pitch...where could you fit him in though?
 
Much better, Fulham looked good at times in the first half and I thought
they'd really test us, very sharp play, but they had no answer after we
had taken the lead.could have been a big win
 
Roll on VillaI was even hoping that Bolton and Man City would draw
so we could stay toplol
 
Another win against Villa and I'm converted


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 08:32
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Best start


Two wins from two.
Hentry and Jarvis playing well.
Playing 442.
 
Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today?

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-21 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

I'd agree with that. Foley is a much better player than Henry. Not sure
we need him to push forward too much with our current team but more so
than Henry.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 09:05
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



I reckon Foley should replace Henry.  Has performs the defensive side of
the role better than Henry and has more natural instinct to get forward
as well.

 

That would be the only change I'd make to the team at the moment.  Ward
was great last night, nearly 50% of Jarvis' crosses found a Wolves
player, Doyle stayed on his feet for a good portion of the game.  Happy
times indeed.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:42 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

Credit where credit is due, they played very well. Very impressive.

 

Even the usual targets like Berra and to a lesser extent Henry played
well.

 

I thought Jarvis was outstanding, and O'hara was much better, he still
gave the ball away a few times but maybe this is because he's got such a
good footballing brain.doesn't mind a shot does he...

 

Hunt is starting to really impress, he'd be a nightmare to play
againstsimilar to O'hara...likesa  shot and is sometimes ahead of
the others with his forward play.

 

Fletcher and Doyle also complimenting each other.

 

Its a tricky one but I thought we looked better with Foley on the
pitch...where could you fit him in though?

 

Much better, Fulham looked good at times in the first half and I thought
they'd really test us, very sharp play, but they had no answer after we
had taken the lead.could have been a big win

 

Roll on VillaI was even hoping that Bolton and Man City would draw
so we could stay toplol

 

Another win against Villa and I'm converted

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 08:32
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Best start

Two wins from two.

Hentry and Jarvis playing well.

Playing 442.

 

Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today?

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-21 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

It was rather ordinary until the goals went in. 
 
I think that the commentator is warming to us thoughwho is he be the
way? (ex West Ham player)


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 10:12
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start



How sad - a bloke moves to the fresh fish capital of the known universe
and all he can do is watch fish fingers defrost.

 

Is that more appropriate comment for this time of the season Rog?

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 9:25 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start

 

Had more exciting times watching fish fingers defrost.

 

Didn't think we could pass comment until the last game of the season was
over.

That's been the mantra from the one eyed, happy clappers for seasons.

Thought it had morphed into a rule for the list.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:32 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Best start

 

Two wins from two.

Hentry and Jarvis playing well.

Playing 442.

 

Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today?

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-21 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED
I don't mind him...usually gives an honest assessment

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 11:35
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Tony Gale(?) was the Londoner.
Think he played for some of the lesser London clubs.
Always seemed pretty fair when adding his twobobsworth on any game.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 10:29 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 
UNCLASSIFIED
It was rather ordinary until the goals went in. 
 
I think that the commentator is warming to us thoughwho is he be the
way? (ex West Ham player)
 
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 10:12
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start
How sad - a bloke moves to the fresh fish capital of the known universe
and all he can do is watch fish fingers defrost.
 
Is that more appropriate comment for this time of the season Rog?
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 9:25 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Best start
 
Had more exciting times watching fish fingers defrost.
 
Didn't think we could pass comment until the last game of the season was
over.
That's been the mantra from the one eyed, happy clappers for seasons.
Thought it had morphed into a rule for the list.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2011 8:32 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Best start
 
Two wins from two.
Hentry and Jarvis playing well.
Playing 442.
 
Come on then moaners, what have you got to complain about today?
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't really
that good.
 
Central midfield and defence will be our downfall.
 
We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle.
 
Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on
Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy
stuff?? 
 
Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Boo! Thick Mick out.  Conceded a goal.  Still not sorted left back.
Henry's rubbish. etc etc


On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote:


Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the
season in days of yore?

The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was
probably in the 1960 Cup Final.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

 

 

Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn
;)  I am surprised that things are so quiet.

 

When was the last time we won away on day one Rog?

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from
the season opener.

 

Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against
Blackburn than I had imagined.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED
I remember Keene scoring a couple when we beat Norwich years ago. Nobody
had ever herad of him.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 13:57
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in
days of yore?
The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in
the 1960 Cup Final.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 
 
 
Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;)  I am
surprised that things are so quiet.
 
When was the last time we won away on day one Rog?
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
 
UNCLASSIFIED
Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the
season opener.
 
Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn
than I had imagined.
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager
-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Credit where credit is due, Fletcher and Ward were excellent, Jarvis
caused problems but he seems to have changed direction...the rest were
as per last year really.
 
When I saw the team, Johnson was the only addition from last year...we
all know we need more than that shirley?


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 08:51
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Sigh.


On 15 August 2011 07:57, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:




UNCLASSIFIED

OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't
really that good.
 
Central midfield and defence will be our downfall.
 
We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another
battle.
 
Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that
impressive on Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with
the fancy stuff?? 
 
Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Boo! Thick Mick out.  Conceded a goal.  Still not sorted left
back.  Henry's rubbish. etc etc


On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au
wrote:


Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game
of the season in days of yore?

The last time we won away from home against Blackburn
was probably in the 1960 Cup Final.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

 

 

Now, knowing something about our performances against
Blackburn ;)  I am surprised that things are so quiet.

 

When was the last time we won away on day one Rog?

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days
away from the season opener.

 

Maybe a few more people have seen our performances
against Blackburn than I had imagined.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the
Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70
of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you
are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager





-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager




-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Just being realistic Paul. Blackburn were missing two key defenders and
were quite poor. 
 
As I said I am happy with the win, we deserved it. However I think we
need strengthening, in exactly the same positions as we did at the end
of last season
 
Agreed, if we beat Fulham next weekend, it would be awesome.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 09:01
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



Come on Lee, it was only the first game and we won for crying out loud!

 

I think you are being a trifle harsh after just one game. In terms of
new player's I wouldn't be surprised if we have made bids for several
player's but have refused to pay the asking price or couldn't
accommodate the player's wages? 

 

I will be happy with 17th again this season, consolidation is the long
term plan.

 

A win against Fulham would be a dream start!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 7:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't really
that good.

 

Central midfield and defence will be our downfall.

 

We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle.

 

Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on
Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy
stuff?? 

 

Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much.

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Boo! Thick Mick out.  Conceded a goal.  Still not sorted left back.
Henry's rubbish. etc etc

On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote:

Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in
days of yore?

The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in
the 1960 Cup Final.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

 

 

Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;)  I am
surprised that things are so quiet.

 

When was the last time we won away on day one Rog?

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 3:34 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the
season opener.

 

Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn
than I had imagined.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

He's obviously been putting in a shift...hahahaha..sorry couldn't help
myself.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 13:45
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



Hopefully a potential buyer was at the Blackburn game or someone is
interested in buying him. God knows who as I think he is pants! Fingers
crossed someone will take him off our hands. 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 1:32 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

How come nobody has mentioned the rare appearance of The Neck?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 1:27 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

UNCLASSIFIED

Complacency will be our downfall, we scraped survival by the skin of our
teeth and our manager is happy with the team???...if you honestly
believe Johnson alone will make that much difference when the likes of
Henry are getting worse then so be it.

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 13:23
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Yes Johnson is the only addition to the team that took 26 points from
the second half of the season.  

 


 

On 15 August 2011 08:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:

UNCLASSIFIED

Credit where credit is due, Fletcher and Ward were excellent, Jarvis
caused problems but he seems to have changed direction...the rest were
as per last year really.

 

When I saw the team, Johnson was the only addition from last year...we
all know we need more than that shirley?

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward

Sent: Monday, 15 August 2011 08:51 


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Sigh.

On 15 August 2011 07:57, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:

UNCLASSIFIED

OK, we won which is fantastic, it really isbut we weren't really
that good.

 

Central midfield and defence will be our downfall.

 

We need at least two quality signings for both to avoid another battle.

 

Just for the rceord...I didn't even think O'hara was that impressive on
Saturday, gave the ball away far too often and whats with the fancy
stuff?? 

 

Fletcher looks the business and Doyle falls over too much.

 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 17:05
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Boo! Thick Mick out.  Conceded a goal.  Still not sorted left back.
Henry's rubbish. etc etc

On 14 August 2011 13:56, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote:

Didn't we used to win away at Norwich on the first game of the season in
days of yore?

The last time we won away from home against Blackburn was probably in
the 1960 Cup Final.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 1:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

 

 

Now, knowing something about our performances against Blackburn ;)  I am
surprised that things are so quiet.

 

When was the last time we won away on day one Rog?

 



From: nswolves

[NSWolves] Quiet [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-08-10 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Can't believe how quiet it is, just a couple of days away from the
season opener.
 
Maybe a few more people have seen our performances against Blackburn
than I had imagined.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


[NSWolves] Thailand Wolves [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-07-20 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Can anyone who went over to Perth remember the name of the bar in
Thailand run by Thai Bri or whatever his name was? and where wa sit.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


[NSWolves] De de de de Michael Kightly [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-07-19 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

Sounds like Michael Kightly is going to be like a new signing for us. 
 
I'm starting to feel like one of those happy clapper types...

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]

2011-07-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Well now you mention it, there are interstate associates toowarmer
weather this time of year.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:43
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting



I guess we are called NSWolves, not SydneyCBDWolves, so we should
consider alternative venues for future events that will enable to spread
the word and goodwill of Wolves to further parts of NSW.  

 

Future meetings could include:

NSWolves Bundanoon Booze-up

NSWolves Boambee East Beer Feast

NSWolves Moss Vale Mash-up

NSWolves Parramatta Chatter-fest

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting

 

C'mon Paul, next thing someone will want it in Moss Vale or Coffs Harbor
- what are you thinking!

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 9:10 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting

 

No.

On 5 July 2011 15:33, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:

Can we have one of these things in Parramatta or anywhere west of
Central station one of these days?

 

Looks a posh venue by the way, looking forward to it!

 

Cheers

 

Paul.

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 1:05 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting

 

Excellent choice.  It's on Mol Mix

On 5 July 2011 09:34, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
wrote:

Morning all,

 

It's been a long time coming but the NSWolves winter meeting will be
held on Saturday 16th July 2011.

 

As usual, bring along your friends, family, football fans so we can all
share in the glorious achievements of Merlin the Magician.

 

Venue: Lord Dudley Hotelhttp://www.lorddudley.com.au/  (Only 5
minutes from the City and handy from Eastern Suburbs)

Time: 12pm onwards

 

See you there.

 

Marcus

 

PS. Can someone post this on the other Wolves list and MolMix.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]

2011-07-14 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Hang on, didn't you choose Queensland, as a special place to pop a
special question?



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 11:06
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]



It lowers the tone of the club if people know it includes Queensland
members.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 11:05 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]

 

Surely OzWolves has better marketing value

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 11:03
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]

We're called NSWolves, not OzWolves!!!  Don't push it.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:51 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting [sec=unclassified]

 

Well now you mention it, there are interstate associates toowarmer
weather this time of year.

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:43
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting

I guess we are called NSWolves, not SydneyCBDWolves, so we should
consider alternative venues for future events that will enable to spread
the word and goodwill of Wolves to further parts of NSW.  

 

Future meetings could include:

NSWolves Bundanoon Booze-up

NSWolves Boambee East Beer Feast

NSWolves Moss Vale Mash-up

NSWolves Parramatta Chatter-fest

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 10:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting

 

C'mon Paul, next thing someone will want it in Moss Vale or Coffs Harbor
- what are you thinking!

 

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 9:10 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting

 

No.

On 5 July 2011 15:33, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:

Can we have one of these things in Parramatta or anywhere west of
Central station one of these days?

 

Looks a posh venue by the way, looking forward to it!

 

Cheers

 

Paul.

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 1:05 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] NSWolves Winter meeting

 

Excellent choice.  It's on Mol Mix

On 5 July 2011 09:34, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
wrote:

Morning all,

 

It's been a long time coming but the NSWolves winter meeting will be
held on Saturday 16th July 2011.

 

As usual, bring along your friends, family, football fans so we can all
share in the glorious achievements of Merlin the Magician.

 

Venue: Lord Dudley Hotelhttp://www.lorddudley.com.au/  (Only 5
minutes from the City and handy from Eastern Suburbs)

Time: 12pm onwards

 

See you there.

 

Marcus

 

PS. Can someone post this on the other Wolves list and MolMix.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-07-11 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I reckon his signing will be confirmed tonight (our time). The bookies usually 
have an idea of what's happening and he's very very short priced, as is Upson. 
 
If we get those two in and Berra joins Halford on the way out...I think we only 
really need a couple more quality signings...none of the lower league ones for 
the future types...I mean decent money signings.
 
Quality replacements for Henry and Elokobi are needed for us to push on but I 
have my doubts about Mad Mick going all out to replace either now.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2011 13:51
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



He hasn't signed yet and I reckon he'll be weighing up other offers.  He said 
that the process was only half-complete and he'll see what happens.

 

Also noticed that ESPN are reporting that Doyle is off to either Arsenal or 
Juventus. 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2011 1:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Looks like Johnson from Small Heath is a done deal.  Excellent move.  Shows 
great intent to spend 7m on a defender

On 4 July 2011 14:22, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

 

We all saw what happened when he was out of the side. We were shot. He is a 
valuable player for us, of that there is no doubt. 

 

I never get into how much a player is worth or what we should pay...I'm not the 
club accountant but the problem is, knowing Wolves, if we got $15m we would 
only buy a $5m replacement and the other $10m would mysteriously dissapear.

 

Incidentally was at the Mol last week, the North Bonk has been completely 
flattened, quite a strange sight looking straight into the ground from the big 
car park. 

 

I'm not too sure about the new shirt yet either...its a very bright shade and 
longI was at the club shop the day they went on sale...no lineups or mass 
crowds...it would have been staright in and out if it wasn't for the seven quid 
barclays patches on the sleeves.

 

Anyone seen the George Elokobi clip where he returns to Cameroon?...what a 
legend...

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 13:58
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle

I think he'd have his price, maybe $15m.  If Arsenal are interested through, he 
must be even better than we think

 


 

On 4 July 2011 11:42, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:

No way we will sell Doyle.

If we do then our ambition that Morgan is talking about will have been thrown 
out the window.

Besides 20 million for Henderson and only 12 million for Doyle?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 11:30 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle

 

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Arsenal-target-Wolves-striker-Kevin-Doyle-for-a-12million-move-to-the-Emirates-article755880.html
 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the 
integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are 
the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


[NSWolves] Doyle n stuff [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-07-03 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
 
We all saw what happened when he was out of the side. We were shot. He is a 
valuable player for us, of that there is no doubt. 
 
I never get into how much a player is worth or what we should pay...I'm not the 
club accountant but the problem is, knowing Wolves, if we got $15m we would 
only buy a $5m replacement and the other $10m would mysteriously dissapear.
 
Incidentally was at the Mol last week, the North Bonk has been completely 
flattened, quite a strange sight looking straight into the ground from the big 
car park. 
 
I'm not too sure about the new shirt yet either...its a very bright shade and 
longI was at the club shop the day they went on sale...no lineups or mass 
crowds...it would have been staright in and out if it wasn't for the seven quid 
barclays patches on the sleeves.
 
Anyone seen the George Elokobi clip where he returns to Cameroon?...what a 
legend...



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 13:58
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle


I think he'd have his price, maybe $15m.  If Arsenal are interested through, he 
must be even better than we think
 

 
On 4 July 2011 11:42, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:


No way we will sell Doyle.

If we do then our ambition that Morgan is talking about will have been 
thrown out the window.

Besides 20 million for Henderson and only 12 million for Doyle?

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com 
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Monday, 4 July 2011 11:30 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Arsenal to offer £12m for Doyle

 


http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Arsenal-target-Wolves-striker-Kevin-Doyle-for-a-12million-move-to-the-Emirates-article755880.html
 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Two things I miss about England [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-25 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
 
I used to miss Roe and Chips but found somewhere that sells roe now.
 
The beer's getting better here but still miss a good pint in a friendly
local pub. 
 
Marsh  Baxters Pork Pies  



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of james graves
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 20:50
To: wolves wolves
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Two things I miss about England


i miss reading the pink on sat night ..

 



Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:35:50 +1000
Subject: [NSWolves] Two things I miss about England
From: millward@gmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

My parents and final score on a Saturday afternoon.  Brings back so many
memories.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13491700.stm



-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-24 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Ward and Jarvis will stay put, unless there is big money on the table for 
Jarvis in particular.
 
The rest should go.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:50
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale



I think the following players need to be removed from the 1st team (if not the 
25 man squad):

 

Berra

Craddock

Elokobi

Ward

Henry

Jarvis?

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
mark worrall
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:46 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale

 

Has it been made public MM has money to spend ?  If so, how much ?

 

I think we need to clear out: Berra, Steerman, Jones, Henry and Jarvis.

 

And get in: O'Hara, 2 decent centre backs (I didn't think Mancienne was bad, 
and noticed he's back in the England U21 squad), and another O'Hara type 
midfielder.

 

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Paul Crowe pcr...@contechengineering.com 
wrote:

Moxey and Morgan will not break their current wage structure, so no chance of 
any of them except O'Hara.

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Spurs Fire Sale

 

Harry Redknapp will listen to offers for up to 14 players this summer as he 
looks to slash the wage bill at Tottenham Hotspur 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/tottenham-hotspur  and pave the way for 
impact signings. The manager is prepared to sell the goalkeeper Heurelho Gomes 
and either Roman Pavlyuchenko or Jermain Defoe, and a host of fringe players.

They are Ben Alnwick, Alan Hutton, Kyle Naughton, Sébastien Bassong, David 
Bentley, Jermaine Jenas, Wilson Palacios, Niko Kranjcar, Jamie O'Hara, Giovani 
dos Santos and Robbie Keane. 

Are there any in this list (O'Hara aside) who we would like to see at Wolves 
and if so do you think we have a realistic chance of getting any of them?

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the 
integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are 
the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

 

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I think Mick is staying, as you say Steve, he would have gone by now if
he was going...
 
The thing is, his heart is in the right place but his brain isn't. We
could get a much better manager, of that there is no doubt but none as
likeable or as passionate as Mick.
 
Our near neighbours stole the march on us...Woy as weally weally done
well, and they will consolidate now.


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 08:07
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats


Wolves won't hire Hughton because he is black.
 
If we were to change manager I'd hope for someone with Premier League
experience.  O'Neill, and Sam are the only two that are currently out of
work but I think it's unlikely we'd get either of them.  They both rely
on having money to spend too.  In fact the pool of managers that have
done well in the Premiership with little money is very small.
 
We could always follow the Wolves tradition of having ex-England
mangers...You know who I mean.
 
It's purely for fun anyway.  I can't see Morgan sacking Mick.  We were
in the bottom three most of the season and he didn't get rid.
 
It's funny how football management is a job that everyone thinks is easy
and that they could do.  It's not the same with anyone else's job is it?

 

 
On 23 May 2011 18:58, stephen nott sjn...@hotmail.com wrote:


Hi all, Chris  Houghton would be the man of choice but will
probabley go to West Ham, the fact that we were so close to the drop
should be reason enough to sack Mick, i hear Brum need a good coech,
cheers ,Steve
 



From: pcr...@contechengineering.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:32:09 +1000 



Mick is a good Manager, the best the Wolves have had since John
Barnwell.

 

Is he the best man to take us to the next level?  I hope so but
personally do not think he is up to it. This season he has at times made
some fundamental mistakes, weird team selections and substitutions in my
opinion. His faith in Henry is blinkered and the most obvious
fundamental mistake  for me, no disrespect to him but he should not be
playing Central Midfield for a Premier league team! Don't like to keep
on harping about Left back but we do not have one and it has cost us
dear this season. When Van Damme left we should have had someone lined
up to replace him during the January transfer window, obvious to
everyone except MM. Baffling decision and it nearly cost us dear,
Elokobi has given away countless goals through poor defending this
second half of the season and cost us points. 

 

Sorry Steve, he is a very decent chap and I have been a big
supporter of his in the past but he lost me early in the New Year. Time
for a change, there is a better alternative available. Martin O'Neill
would be my choice followed by Chris Houghton. Also, why not try and
poach Phelan from Manure, worth a call?

 

All this is hypothetical though Steve, MM is going nowhere until
Xmas at the earliest.

 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats

 

But you do support him?  Would you join me in agreeing that he
is an excellent manager?

On 23 May 2011 15:24, Marcus Chantry
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:

Where support is justified I shall provide my support.  Until
then I shall perform the role of silent subscriber on this list.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:20 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats

 

Only seven more points needed.   Cut out some silly late points
lost and we'd be there.  WBA away for example.

 

Marcus, you've been very quiet today.  May I remind you that
under the terms of the bet: 

 

Marcus must publicly support Mick



 

On 23 May 2011 11:00, Rog  Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au
wrote:

Morgan wants to finish in the top 10 next season.

Did the commentators 

RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
The Revolution? Get him in now!
 
The team will be coming out to Billy Bragg and we'll all be happy.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 08:16
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats


Although I think Rog would like Hughton.  He apparently used to write a
column for the Workers Revolutionary Party's newspaper News Line.


 
On 24 May 2011 08:07, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote:


Wolves won't hire Hughton because he is black.
 
If we were to change manager I'd hope for someone with Premier
League experience.  O'Neill, and Sam are the only two that are currently
out of work but I think it's unlikely we'd get either of them.  They
both rely on having money to spend too.  In fact the pool of managers
that have done well in the Premiership with little money is very small.
 
We could always follow the Wolves tradition of having ex-England
mangers...You know who I mean.
 
It's purely for fun anyway.  I can't see Morgan sacking Mick.
We were in the bottom three most of the season and he didn't get rid.
 
It's funny how football management is a job that everyone thinks
is easy and that they could do.  It's not the same with anyone else's
job is it?  
 

 
On 23 May 2011 18:58, stephen nott sjn...@hotmail.com wrote:


Hi all, Chris  Houghton would be the man of choice but
will probabley go to West Ham, the fact that we were so close to the
drop should be reason enough to sack Mick, i hear Brum need a good
coech, cheers ,Steve
 



From: pcr...@contechengineering.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:32:09 +1000 



Mick is a good Manager, the best the Wolves have had
since John Barnwell.

 

Is he the best man to take us to the next level?  I hope
so but personally do not think he is up to it. This season he has at
times made some fundamental mistakes, weird team selections and
substitutions in my opinion. His faith in Henry is blinkered and the
most obvious fundamental mistake  for me, no disrespect to him but he
should not be playing Central Midfield for a Premier league team! Don't
like to keep on harping about Left back but we do not have one and it
has cost us dear this season. When Van Damme left we should have had
someone lined up to replace him during the January transfer window,
obvious to everyone except MM. Baffling decision and it nearly cost us
dear, Elokobi has given away countless goals through poor defending this
second half of the season and cost us points. 

 

Sorry Steve, he is a very decent chap and I have been a
big supporter of his in the past but he lost me early in the New Year.
Time for a change, there is a better alternative available. Martin
O'Neill would be my choice followed by Chris Houghton. Also, why not try
and poach Phelan from Manure, worth a call?

 

All this is hypothetical though Steve, MM is going
nowhere until Xmas at the earliest.

 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:48 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats

 

But you do support him?  Would you join me in agreeing
that he is an excellent manager?

On 23 May 2011 15:24, Marcus Chantry
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:

Where support is justified I shall provide my support.
Until then I shall perform the role of silent subscriber on this list.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 3:20 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats

 

Only seven more points needed.   Cut out some silly late
points lost and 

RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
You want a bet on next season already. Thats like putting money of the
Melbourne Cup before you know who is running.
 
Early reports suggest O'Hara is going to be signed along with other
positions being addressed. If we get the players we want, I am confidant
we can do much better, the problem as been enticing good players to
Wolverhampton though...maybe our survival will make the better players
see stability at last.
 
Henry to QPR...lets start the revolution.
Quality leftback
Talk of Johnson from Blues
 
It is a season to be merrythe off season
 
Off to the UK to purchase my swanky new Wolves top on Thursday.
 
 
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 09:39
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]


I know it seems that I am stubbornly in favour of Mick and won't listen
to anything said against him.  I have been trying to put myself in the
other camp for the last few days but I keep coming back to these
points:

*   He is the best manager we've had for some time, at least in
terms of the success he's brought the club. 
*   With the side we have I think he's about on par.  Could another
manager punch further above our current weight?  Possibly, but I think
it's unsustainable in the long term.  Roy will be an intersting one to
watch next season. 
*   We still have a side that is 50% the same as the one that won
the championship.  It's hard to argue that the team should be doing
better on those grounds 
*   I also think Mick gets more out of the team than they actually
have in terms of quality.  The team seem to like him very much. 
*   We've beaten some very good teams.  The number we have beaten
makes it very hard to put down to fluke.  I think we have looked really
good at times. 
*   Despite appearing to make bad decisions in selection, I have to
assume that he knows more about it than anyone else.

 This next season is probably do or die though.  I assume that we'll buy
O'Hara plus a couple of other players, such as a left back and a central
defender.  That will remove some more of the championship team.  It wil
still be a low wage side though
 
Lee do you fancy a bet on the position of Wolves and Albion next season?
Same consequences as my bet with Marcus this season.  I bet that Wolves
will finish above Albion.
 
 
On 24 May 2011 08:17, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


I think Mick is staying, as you say Steve, he would have gone by
now if he was going...
 
The thing is, his heart is in the right place but his brain
isn't. We could get a much better manager, of that there is no doubt but
none as likeable or as passionate as Mick.
 
Our near neighbours stole the march on us...Woy as weally weally
done well, and they will consolidate now.


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 08:07
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats


Wolves won't hire Hughton because he is black.
 
If we were to change manager I'd hope for someone with Premier
League experience.  O'Neill, and Sam are the only two that are currently
out of work but I think it's unlikely we'd get either of them.  They
both rely on having money to spend too.  In fact the pool of managers
that have done well in the Premiership with little money is very small.
 
We could always follow the Wolves tradition of having ex-England
mangers...You know who I mean.
 
It's purely for fun anyway.  I can't see Morgan sacking Mick.
We were in the bottom three most of the season and he didn't get rid.
 
It's funny how football management is a job that everyone thinks
is easy and that they could do.  It's not the same with anyone else's
job is it?  
 

 
On 23 May 2011 18:58, stephen nott sjn...@hotmail.com wrote:


Hi all, Chris  Houghton would be the man of choice but
will probabley go to West Ham, the fact that we were so close to the
drop should be reason enough to sack Mick, i hear Brum need a good
coech, cheers ,Steve
 



From: pcr...@contechengineering.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:32:09 +1000 



Mick is a good Manager, the best the Wolves have had
since John Barnwell.

 

Is he the best man to take us to the next level?  I hope
so but personally do not think he is up to it. This season he has at
times made some

RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I know you probably don't think so Steve, but even I am more optimistic
about the future, even with McCarthy at the helm. 
 
It is quite possible that the next level of spending is about to be
unleashed to.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 13:13
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]


Interesting idea.  A couple of loan or bosman signings might be the way
to go now to give us that kick start to another level without big
capital outlay.  We should be able to get some better players than
Mancienne in on loan.  Lescott from City?  Most other clubs do it.
We've tended to get the young and hungry players from the fringes rather
than those that are towards the end of their career and that might be
time to change now.
 
I still can hardly believe we stayed up.  It looked bleak for much of
last season.
 
 


 
On 24 May 2011 10:18, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
wrote:


I wish Morgan could use his influence/business relationship to
get Michael Owen to come to us.  The guy is off contract and is a
natural goalscorer (maybe he could teach Doyle how to find the net).
Watching him on Sunday for United highlighted how good a player he still
is - movement, pace, dragging defenders all over the place.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:15 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
[sec=unclassified]

 

Agreed. We just need some quality now. I don't mean a Rory Delap
type player, where our whole game revolves around lonmg throw ins, or
balls..I mean some real creativity along with decisive defending.

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:04
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
[sec=unclassified]

We were playing some old Wolves DVDs on the weekend, and on one
was a match from the Championship against Watford pre-MM. It was
sobering to be reminded how bad wee were back then compared to now, and
far MM has really bought us. 

 

The need for tough tackling midfielders ? For creative
midfielders ? For goal scorers ? For a manager capable of getting us
into the PL / And for keeping us there ? MM got us there, and has kept
us there 2 seasons running, on a shoestring budget.

 

Remember all the fans constantly moaning there wasnt enough
commitment, passion and desire to win ?  'Wasters' ? MM clearly has
turned that one around and deserves full credit for it.

 

 

 

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Steven Millward
millward@gmail.com wrote:

I know it seems that I am stubbornly in favour of Mick and won't
listen to anything said against him.  I have been trying to put myself
in the other camp for the last few days but I keep coming back to
these points:

*   He is the best manager we've had for some time, at least
in terms of the success he's brought the club. 
*   With the side we have I think he's about on par.  Could
another manager punch further above our current weight?  Possibly, but I
think it's unsustainable in the long term.  Roy will be an intersting
one to watch next season. 
*   We still have a side that is 50% the same as the one
that won the championship.  It's hard to argue that the team should be
doing better on those grounds 
*   I also think Mick gets more out of the team than they
actually have in terms of quality.  The team seem to like him very much.

*   We've beaten some very good teams.  The number we have
beaten makes it very hard to put down to fluke.  I think we have looked
really good at times. 
*   Despite appearing to make bad decisions in selection, I
have to assume that he knows more about it than anyone else.

 This next season is probably do or die though.  I assume that
we'll buy O'Hara plus a couple of other players, such as a left back and
a central defender.  That will remove some more of the championship
team.  It wil still be a low wage side though

 

Lee do you fancy a bet on the position of Wolves and Albion next
season?  Same consequences as my bet with Marcus this season.  I bet
that Wolves will finish above Albion.

 

 

On 24 May 2011 08:17, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

I think Mick is staying, as you say Steve, he would have gone by
now if he was going...

 

The thing is, his heart is in the right place but his

RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-23 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
There are some quality players available based on that principle Mark. 
 
Scott Parker - West Ham
Charlie Adam - Blackpool
Johnson - Blues
 
Many many more
 
 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 13:42
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats [sec=unclassified]


MM should be targetting the player who wont want to stay at the
relegated clubs.  But Im sure he knows that, as thats how we got Doyle,
Hunt, Hahneman, etc.


On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


I know you probably don't think so Steve, but even I am more
optimistic about the future, even with McCarthy at the helm. 
 
It is quite possible that the next level of spending is about to
be unleashed to.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward

Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 13:13 

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
[sec=unclassified]


Interesting idea.  A couple of loan or bosman signings might be
the way to go now to give us that kick start to another level without
big capital outlay.  We should be able to get some better players than
Mancienne in on loan.  Lescott from City?  Most other clubs do it.
We've tended to get the young and hungry players from the fringes rather
than those that are towards the end of their career and that might be
time to change now.
 
I still can hardly believe we stayed up.  It looked bleak for
much of last season.
 
 


 
On 24 May 2011 10:18, Marcus Chantry
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:


I wish Morgan could use his influence/business
relationship to get Michael Owen to come to us.  The guy is off contract
and is a natural goalscorer (maybe he could teach Doyle how to find the
net).  Watching him on Sunday for United highlighted how good a player
he still is - movement, pace, dragging defenders all over the place.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:15 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
[sec=unclassified]

 

Agreed. We just need some quality now. I don't mean a
Rory Delap type player, where our whole game revolves around lonmg throw
ins, or balls..I mean some real creativity along with decisive
defending.

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2011 10:04
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Get the men in white coats
[sec=unclassified]

We were playing some old Wolves DVDs on the weekend, and
on one was a match from the Championship against Watford pre-MM. It was
sobering to be reminded how bad wee were back then compared to now, and
far MM has really bought us. 

 

The need for tough tackling midfielders ? For creative
midfielders ? For goal scorers ? For a manager capable of getting us
into the PL / And for keeping us there ? MM got us there, and has kept
us there 2 seasons running, on a shoestring budget.

 

Remember all the fans constantly moaning there wasnt
enough commitment, passion and desire to win ?  'Wasters' ? MM clearly
has turned that one around and deserves full credit for it.

 

 

 

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Steven Millward
millward@gmail.com wrote:

I know it seems that I am stubbornly in favour of Mick
and won't listen to anything said against him.  I have been trying to
put myself in the other camp for the last few days but I keep coming
back to these points:

*   He is the best manager we've had for some time,
at least in terms of the success he's brought the club. 
*   With the side we have I think he's about on par.
Could another manager punch further above our current weight?  Possibly,
but I think it's unsustainable in the long term.  Roy will be an
intersting one to watch next season. 
*   We still have a side that is 50% the same as the
one that won the championship.  It's hard to argue that the team should
be doing better on those grounds 
*   I also think Mick gets more out of the team than
they actually have in terms of quality.  The team seem

RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-22 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
You are joking Steve? We were very very fortunate. That game showed all
our inadequencies...wake up call if ever I have seen one...Henry put in
the worst captains performance ever...but it wasn't just him.
 
Hope the look of despair and then relief on Morgans face means hand in
pocket for O'Neil.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 05:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick


Suck it up Princess.  Let's start hearing the love for Mick.




On 23 May 2011 01:54, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
wrote:


Looks like I won't have to bother singing Mick's praises in the
Championship next season. 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the
information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies.
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached
files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not
reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-22 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Never been so deflated after such a huge win.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 07:16
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick [sec=unclassified]


You are joking Steve? We were very very fortunate. That game showed all
our inadequencies...wake up call if ever I have seen one...Henry put in
the worst captains performance ever...but it wasn't just him.
 
Hope the look of despair and then relief on Morgans face means hand in
pocket for O'Neil.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 05:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Thanks Mick


Suck it up Princess.  Let's start hearing the love for Mick.




On 23 May 2011 01:54, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
wrote:


Looks like I won't have to bother singing Mick's praises in the
Championship next season. 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the
information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies.
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached
files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not
reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager

-- 
Marcus thinks Mick is a superb manager


RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-19 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
So whats the go?, is the game on viewers choice?



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 20 May 2011 08:09
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches



we're just scraping 5th in the voting this morning.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 11:35 PM
To: Wolves
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches

 

I'm pretty sure I saw an advert last Saturday night for Wolves v
Blackburn on Foxtel in the half time break.



From: jpar...@munichre.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:31:40 +1000
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] TV Matches

I thought that was going to haappen on Dec 21st 2012? Or is that only
the Mayan doomsday?
 

From: Rog  Reet [mailto:rognr...@exemail.com.au] 
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 05:13 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com 
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches 
 

Don't worry about what matches are scheduled to be shown on Monday.

None of it's going to happen as Saturday is World Rapture Day.

The earth's going to be destroyed by something called a Loving God.

 

I'm going to celebrate big time on Saturday, no more useless Mick.

Was looking forward to Marcus praising the hopeless plonker next season
though.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:39 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] TV Matches

 

Idiots. Looks like they'll be showing Villa v Liverpool and Bolton v Man
City from the voting. 2 matches that dont mean anything to relegation,
just because of the volume of fans. They could easily just show the
relegation matches + ManUtd (anyway).

 

btw, If they are recording IPs, just try voting from a different machine
or connection (e.g. mobile, laptop, etc).

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Marcus Chantry
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:

I just did the same to most of my address book.  We've got a lot of
ground to make up to make it the main game but we're giving it a late
go!!  Voting closes tomorrow at lunchtime.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:03 PM


To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches

 

Have sent it out to around 30 clients and asked that they pass it on.

 

Jim 



 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:01 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches

 

Yes I've been voting non-stop for the past 10 minutes but the numbers
haven't changed so they must have something setup to prevent multiple
votes.  

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:54 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] TV Matches

 

I just got 3 of my lot to vote 3 times each. They usually set those
things to record IP addresses to prevent duplicate voting.

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Paul Crowe
pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:

Just voted 3 x times and we have stayed at 11.4%.

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:42 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV Matches
Importance: High

 

If any of you are still on the worldwide Wolves list or MolMix can you
please post this link and get everyone to vote for our match:

 

http://www.foxsports.com.au/football/premier-league/foxsportscomau-gives
-users-the-chance-to-vote-on-which-barclays-premier-league-matches-to-br
oadcast/story-e6frf4a3-1226056393366

 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:39 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] TV Matches
Importance: High

 

Guys,

 

Everyone needs to go to foxsports.com.au and vote for our match to be
shown on Sunday.  As there are too many matches for multi-view, they are
taking votes for the matches to be shown so get everybody that you know
to go online and vote for our match PLEASE!!!


Cheers,

Marcus

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or

[NSWolves] Progress [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-18 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I've changed the title because it would have been too long with my extra
bit added.
 
Anyway, Morgan seems to be working on the small step theory, which
totally baffles me because he's just about to spend a fortune on a
stadium which will be half full if the small step we made this year
isn't enough???



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 09:13
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick
McCarthy to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated.


Maybe thats based on Morgan only planning on putting in small amounts of
money each year, and measuring MM on what he achieved with it ? 

He wont get a big name manager in as they will expect lots of money to
spend, which he obviously doesnt want to pay.


On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Marcus Chantry
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:


What worries me is that Morgan has stated that Mick has made
progress every year since he took over but when you look at how he's
measured that it is the context of very small fractions or single
points, so based on that run rate Morgan will be 100 years old before he
sees us getting anywhere near the top of the table (assuming everyone
else stays stagnant for that entire period).

 

Why can't Morgan accept that Mick has reached the limit of his
ability and take the plunge.  5 years is long enough in most roles.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 9:00 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants
Mick McCarthy to stay on as the club's manager even if they are
relegated.

 

Good to see we're both on the ball Mark.  I just posted a link
to the same story on ESPN. 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 8:55 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick
McCarthy to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated.

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13440664.stm

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the
information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies.
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached
files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not
reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-17 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
So better odds putting on individual bets?



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2011 09:36
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


For us to go down, two of the teams below us have to win, Blackburn
either draw or win.
Odds for,
Blackburn win $3.90, draw $3.00 (Can't remember a draw being so low)
Brum win $6.50
Blackpool win $5.50
Wigan win $2.38
 
6 bets covers all combinations.
Minimum single win, $39+
Maximum single win $139+
Minimum three wins $192+
Maximum 3 wins $250+
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:35 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
 
Down to $7.50 here now.  Still worth a go I reckon
On 16 May 2011 17:43, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote:
If I was a Blackburn fan I might look at it like this:
*   We've only won three away all season. 
*   We haven't won away since 2010. 
*   We've let in more goals on the road than any other team in the
league
*   We've had an awful season, sacking a proven manager and
replacing him with a muppet 
*   Samba is injured 
*   Or as one Blackburn fan says:  Actually, this is a must win
game. Can we win it?  Very very unlikely.   The die was cast in December
as i've said before.   The club is disastrously managed at all levels
now and the outcome is inevitable.
*   BUT we are playing Wolves!
 
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
 
If I was a Blackburn fan I might look at it like this:
*   We've only won three away all season. 
*   We haven't won away since 2010. 
*   We've let in more goals on the road than any other team in the
league 
*   We're playing a resurgent team who've won two in a row, scoring
three goals in each. 
*   We've had an awful season, sacking a proven manager and
replacing him with a muppet 
*   Samba is injured 
*   Or as one Blackburn fan says:  Actually, this is a must win
game. Can we win it?  Very very unlikely.   The die was cast in December
as i've said before.   The club is disastrously managed at all levels
now and the outcome is inevitable.
See, the sh1te coloured glasses work for everyone.  It's more a
reflection of being a football fan than it is about Wolves ability.  
On 16 May 2011 10:15, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:
Look at it this way, if you were a Blackburn fan,  we would be one of
the teams you would want to play.
 
There's going to be a surprsie somewhere, its happened all year. If all
the results go according to the table we will be fine whatever happens
against Blackburn, because all those around us SHOULD loose as well.
 
It doesn't work like that thoughjust as well we've won our last two
though isn't it?
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:09 

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
 
Out of Light, Cometh Darkness.
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
But unless my memory is failing me we have a long and distinguished
record in helping teams break their long losing streaks or improving
their disastrous away records.  Just because they are struggling doesn't
mean we don't have it in us to capitulate.  We haven't won 3 matches in
a row since April 2009 (in the Championship, not the Premier League).
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]
 
Such negativity
*   Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the
Europa 
*   Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours.  4 losses and 2 draws
in the last 6 games. 
*   Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT.  They haven't lost there
all season.  They might play their second string but their 25 man squad
is superb.  I don't think the argument of caring about their record is
valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. 
*   Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had
anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last
three.  Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. 
*   I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool
or Blackburn 
*   Odds of three wins in a row are small

RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-16 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
If all goes well I'll be sending Steve Morgan a nice little letter explaining 
why he should bite the bullet and pay good money for Martin O'Neil.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:50
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]


Depending on how it's going you can start to get yourself in a mindset to 
publicly supprt Mick as a manager, and think of some lovely things to say about 
him.
 
I shall be expecting you to gush on Monday morning if all goes well.
 
:D


On 17 May 2011 09:12, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:


There is no way in the world that I'm going to bed before I know the 
results.  I'm just waiting to see which games they put on viewers choice.



 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:07 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]

 

Not sure what else he could say really.  The only alternative would be 
We'll be down by next Sunday - and it's all my fault

 

I would love it if we beat them and sent them down.  Loovvv 
ttt.

 

There were some rumours that Arry doesn't want to get into the Europa 
as he wants toget top 4 in the league next season.  However, they would qualify 
even if they lose through Fair Play, although that would mean more qualifaciton 
games in the summer.

 

Is anyone getting up to watch it unfold live, or are you all risking 
that log onto the BBC website next Monday morning?



 

On 17 May 2011 08:39, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com 
wrote:


http://www.sport.co.uk/news/Football/53540/This_time_next_Sunday_well_be_safe_-_Kean.aspx

 

 

Marcus Chantry 
Associate Director  ½  Senior Product Manager  ½  Macquarie Life

Banking and Financial Services Group ½ Macquarie Group Limited ½ 1 
Shelley St, Sydney, NSW, 2000

T 02 8232 4259½ M 0448 887 627 ½ marcus.chan...@macquarie.com

 

  http://www.macquarie.com.au/mgl/au/advisers/campaigns/fivestars 

 

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this 
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee 
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed 
are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
image001.jpg

RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-16 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
He should be listening to all fans, because to put it plain and simple we are 
not going anywhere while Macarthy is in charge of the team.
 
You can't tell me, anyone is happy going through this hell every year? Quite 
frankly we are lucky to be still in the mix.
 
 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 11:20
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]


I'm sure a successful businessman like Morgan will be strongly influenced by 
the opinion of some bloke from Australia that he's never heard of.
 

 
On 17 May 2011 10:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


If all goes well I'll be sending Steve Morgan a nice little letter 
explaining why he should bite the bullet and pay good money for Martin O'Neil.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:50
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]


Depending on how it's going you can start to get yourself in a mindset 
to publicly supprt Mick as a manager, and think of some lovely things to say 
about him.
 
I shall be expecting you to gush on Monday morning if all goes well.
 
:D


On 17 May 2011 09:12, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com 
wrote:


There is no way in the world that I'm going to bed before I 
know the results.  I'm just waiting to see which games they put on viewers 
choice.



 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:07 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]

 

Not sure what else he could say really.  The only alternative 
would be We'll be down by next Sunday - and it's all my fault

 

I would love it if we beat them and sent them down.  
Loovvv ttt.

 

There were some rumours that Arry doesn't want to get into the 
Europa as he wants toget top 4 in the league next season.  However, they would 
qualify even if they lose through Fair Play, although that would mean more 
qualifaciton games in the summer.

 

Is anyone getting up to watch it unfold live, or are you all 
risking that log onto the BBC website next Monday morning?



 

On 17 May 2011 08:39, Marcus Chantry 
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:


http://www.sport.co.uk/news/Football/53540/This_time_next_Sunday_well_be_safe_-_Kean.aspx

 

 

Marcus Chantry 
Associate Director  ½  Senior Product Manager  ½  Macquarie Life

Banking and Financial Services Group ½ Macquarie Group Limited 
½ 1 Shelley St, Sydney, NSW, 2000

T 02 8232 4259½ M 0448 887 627 ½ marcus.chan...@macquarie.com

 

  
http://www.macquarie.com.au/mgl/au/advisers/campaigns/fivestars 

 

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you 
are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in 
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not 
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions 
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of 
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what 
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what 
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what 
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.





-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door

RE: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-16 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I'm not so easily satisfied. 
 
At times we have been absolutely terrible this year, and certainly no better 
than last. . I can't explain how we have done well against the top teams, yet 
crumble so badly against poorer opposition. I hope come 3am on Monday morning 
the few big wins have been enough, because its the losses against lower teams 
that have cost us..
 
Macarthy failed to patch up the side sufficiently pre season, we all new our 
defence wasn't up to the task, and that has proved the case time and again. Its 
taken him until we were absolutely desperate for results to make changes that 
have worked (Bringing Fletcher in, dropping Berra)..and god knows what 
he'll do on Sunday now Doyle is fit??
 
He's a nice Guy and its natural to have some loyalty towards a man who got us 
promoted and kept us up, but I just don't see too much on field progress.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 12:48
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]


It's been the most enjoyable footballing season of my life.  We've beaten some 
good teams, played some nice stuff, seen a lot of rubbish and have had a very 
exciting relegation battle.
 
There's no chance of an acheivement at the top end of the table so we might as 
well have some fun at the bottom.  We're only a few points of being a mid table 
team.  I'ts been very tight this year.  A few errors that cost us points have 
made the difference but with a few new players next season we have the makings 
of a good side.  You can't blame Mick for Zubar's silly backpass for example.
 
I think the team has progressed.  Most other seasons we'd have been safe by now.
 
I come back to the debate of manager vs players.  Is Mick really to blame?  If 
he's so bad at picking a team how come we beat so many big teams?


On 17 May 2011 11:22, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


He should be listening to all fans, because to put it plain and simple 
we are not going anywhere while Macarthy is in charge of the team.
 
You can't tell me, anyone is happy going through this hell every year? 
Quite frankly we are lucky to be still in the mix.
 
 




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Steven Millward

Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 11:20
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] [sec=unclassified]


I'm sure a successful businessman like Morgan will be strongly 
influenced by the opinion of some bloke from Australia that he's never heard of.
 

 
On 17 May 2011 10:55, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


If all goes well I'll be sending Steve Morgan a nice little 
letter explaining why he should bite the bullet and pay good money for Martin 
O'Neil.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:50
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]


Depending on how it's going you can start to get yourself in a 
mindset to publicly supprt Mick as a manager, and think of some lovely things 
to say about him.
 
I shall be expecting you to gush on Monday morning if all goes 
well.
 
:D


On 17 May 2011 09:12, Marcus Chantry 
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:


There is no way in the world that I'm going to bed 
before I know the results.  I'm just waiting to see which games they put on 
viewers choice.



 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:07 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves]

 

Not sure what else he could say really.  The only 
alternative would be We'll be down by next Sunday - and it's all my fault

 

I would love it if we beat them and sent them down.  
Loovvv ttt.

 

There were some rumours that Arry doesn't want to get 
into the Europa as he wants toget top 4 in the league next season.  However, 
they would qualify even if they lose through Fair Play, although that would 
mean more qualifaciton games in the summer

RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw
we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins
in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the
others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for.
 
$100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Bet


William Hill have us at $9 to go down.  What time do they open the book
again in Australia?  Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on
offer here.


-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I disagree, I think we are in a very worrying situation. Blackburn will
be just as hungry as us, and they aren't that bad a teamask Rog how
they ripped us apart last year (we had to sit through the worst game
ever...although The Hoff scored...), and they did the same earlier this
year.
 
I honestly can't see Blackpool beating Man U, and if they draw we'll nip
them on goal difference unless Blackburn tonk us..sorry Jeremy. So we
just need one of either Wigan or Blues to loose as well..
 
Its a situation none of us wanted to be in going into the last game of
the seasonthe Spurs situation re the Europa does give me some
optimism.
 
The saver bet sounds bloody good to me though, if I can get 9/1 I'm on
it, although I hear the odds have dropped much lower than that.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:23
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


It's a saver.  It's a betting term I think that Rog is best to
explain.  I don't think it will happen but it the stars aligned and it
did the 10x return would be some consolation.
 
Only a Wolves fan could seriously fear for our current situation.  I
wouldn't swap with any of the teams that are still in the mix for
relegation.


On 16 May 2011 08:37, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
wrote:


How can you complain about such negativity when it was you who
suggested having a punt on us to get relegated?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward 

Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]





 

Such negativity

*   Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in
the Europa 
*   Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours.  4 losses and
2 draws in the last 6 games. 
*   Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT.  They haven't lost
there all season.  They might play their second string but their 25 man
squad is superb.  I don't think the argument of caring about their
record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. 
*   Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they
haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two
of the last three.  Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal.

*   I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues,
Blackpool or Blackburn 
*   Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately
the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two
so we don't have to worry about those odds.

 

On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at
least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on
three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and
all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for.

 

$100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen.

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Bet

William Hill have us at $9 to go down.  What time do they open
the book again in Australia?  Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds
are on offer here.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the
information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies.
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached
files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not
reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

 



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would

RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Blackburn



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:35
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


Which teams around us would you swap places with Lee?


On 16 May 2011 09:31, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


I disagree, I think we are in a very worrying situation.
Blackburn will be just as hungry as us, and they aren't that bad a
teamask Rog how they ripped us apart last year (we had to sit
through the worst game ever...although The Hoff scored...), and they did
the same earlier this year.
 
I honestly can't see Blackpool beating Man U, and if they draw
we'll nip them on goal difference unless Blackburn tonk us..sorry
Jeremy. So we just need one of either Wigan or Blues to loose as
well..
 
Its a situation none of us wanted to be in going into the last
game of the seasonthe Spurs situation re the Europa does give me
some optimism.
 

The saver bet sounds bloody good to me though, if I can get 9/1
I'm on it, although I hear the odds have dropped much lower than that.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward

Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:23 

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


It's a saver.  It's a betting term I think that Rog is best to
explain.  I don't think it will happen but it the stars aligned and it
did the 10x return would be some consolation.
 
Only a Wolves fan could seriously fear for our current
situation.  I wouldn't swap with any of the teams that are still in the
mix for relegation.


On 16 May 2011 08:37, Marcus Chantry
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:


How can you complain about such negativity when it was
you who suggested having a punt on us to get relegated?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward 

Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]









 

Such negativity

*   Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a
spot in the Europa 
*   Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours.  4
losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. 
*   Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT.  They
haven't lost there all season.  They might play their second string but
their 25 man squad is superb.  I don't think the argument of caring
about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. 
*   Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but,
they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won
two of the last three.  Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one
goal. 
*   I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan,
Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn 
*   Odds of three wins in a row are small, but
fortunately the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the
other two so we don't have to worry about those odds. 

 

On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for
at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds
on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible,
and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for.

 

$100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen.

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Bet

William Hill have us at $9 to go down.  What time do
they open the book again in Australia?  Got to be worth a few bob if the
same odds are on offer here.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history,
what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was
knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history,
what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was
knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history

RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Blackburn



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:35
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


Which teams around us would you swap places with Lee?


On 16 May 2011 09:31, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


I disagree, I think we are in a very worrying situation.
Blackburn will be just as hungry as us, and they aren't that bad a
teamask Rog how they ripped us apart last year (we had to sit
through the worst game ever...although The Hoff scored...), and they did
the same earlier this year.
 
I honestly can't see Blackpool beating Man U, and if they draw
we'll nip them on goal difference unless Blackburn tonk us..sorry
Jeremy. So we just need one of either Wigan or Blues to loose as
well..
 
Its a situation none of us wanted to be in going into the last
game of the seasonthe Spurs situation re the Europa does give me
some optimism.
 

The saver bet sounds bloody good to me though, if I can get 9/1
I'm on it, although I hear the odds have dropped much lower than that.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward

Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 09:23 

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


It's a saver.  It's a betting term I think that Rog is best to
explain.  I don't think it will happen but it the stars aligned and it
did the 10x return would be some consolation.
 
Only a Wolves fan could seriously fear for our current
situation.  I wouldn't swap with any of the teams that are still in the
mix for relegation.


On 16 May 2011 08:37, Marcus Chantry
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote:


How can you complain about such negativity when it was
you who suggested having a punt on us to get relegated?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward 

Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]









 

Such negativity

*   Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a
spot in the Europa 
*   Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours.  4
losses and 2 draws in the last 6 games. 
*   Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT.  They
haven't lost there all season.  They might play their second string but
their 25 man squad is superb.  I don't think the argument of caring
about their record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. 
*   Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but,
they haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won
two of the last three.  Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one
goal. 
*   I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan,
Blues, Blackpool or Blackburn 
*   Odds of three wins in a row are small, but
fortunately the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the
other two so we don't have to worry about those odds. 

 

On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for
at least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds
on three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible,
and all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for.

 

$100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen.

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Bet

William Hill have us at $9 to go down.  What time do
they open the book again in Australia?  Got to be worth a few bob if the
same odds are on offer here.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history,
what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was
knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history,
what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was
knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history

RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Look at it this way, if you were a Blackburn fan,  we would be one of
the teams you would want to play.
 
There's going to be a surprsie somewhere, its happened all year. If all
the results go according to the table we will be fine whatever happens
against Blackburn, because all those around us SHOULD loose as well.
 
It doesn't work like that thoughjust as well we've won our last two
though isn't it?



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:09
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


Out of Light, Cometh Darkness.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]



But unless my memory is failing me we have a long and distinguished
record in helping teams break their long losing streaks or improving
their disastrous away records.  Just because they are struggling doesn't
mean we don't have it in us to capitulate.  We haven't won 3 matches in
a row since April 2009 (in the Championship, not the Premier League).

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

 

Such negativity

*   Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the
Europa 
*   Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours.  4 losses and 2 draws
in the last 6 games. 
*   Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT.  They haven't lost there
all season.  They might play their second string but their 25 man squad
is superb.  I don't think the argument of caring about their record is
valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. 
*   Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had
anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last
three.  Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. 
*   I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool
or Blackburn 
*   Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately the
outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two so we
don't have to worry about those odds.

 

On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw
we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins
in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the
others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for.

 

$100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen.

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Bet

William Hill have us at $9 to go down.  What time do they open the book
again in Australia?  Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on
offer here.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for
any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views
expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are
not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the
sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if
you are not the intended recipient. 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked

RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
 
I'm going to get me some. Woolworths have stopped selling it in
Queensland though.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:37
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]



Marcus, Black is the key superstitious word for me at the moment.

 

I have been buying Black Pudding from an English Butcher in Lakemba
these last few weeks and was talking with my Dad last night who has also
been eating Black Pudding lately as well. We are both buying Black
Puddings again this week so there is nothing to worry about! Lucky
Underpants, Wolves shirt, Rosary and scarf on TV + Black Pudding = Happy
Days!!!

 

 

3 - 1 to the Wolves again with Fletcher bagging 2!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

Website: www.contechengineering.com

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:13 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

 

We definitely got the light from the Stadium of Light.  What are we
going to get from the Black Country?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:09 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

 

Out of Light, Cometh Darkness.

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

But unless my memory is failing me we have a long and distinguished
record in helping teams break their long losing streaks or improving
their disastrous away records.  Just because they are struggling doesn't
mean we don't have it in us to capitulate.  We haven't won 3 matches in
a row since April 2009 (in the Championship, not the Premier League).

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

 

Such negativity

*   Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in the
Europa 
*   Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours.  4 losses and 2 draws
in the last 6 games. 
*   Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT.  They haven't lost there
all season.  They might play their second string but their 25 man squad
is superb.  I don't think the argument of caring about their record is
valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. 
*   Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they haven't had
anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two of the last
three.  Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal. 
*   I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues, Blackpool
or Blackburn 
*   Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately the
outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two so we
don't have to worry about those odds.

 

On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at least a draw
we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on three wins
in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and all the
others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for.

 

$100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen.

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Bet

William Hill have us at $9 to go down.  What time do they open the book
again in Australia?  Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds are on
offer here.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what

RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
If there's one thing Wolves do well, its end a team's dodgy run...we are
top of the league in that..
 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:58
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


If I was a Blackburn fan I might look at it like this:

*   We've only won three away all season. 
*   We haven't won away since 2010. 
*   We've let in more goals on the road than any other team in the
league 
*   We're playing a resurgent team who've won two in a row, scoring
three goals in each. 
*   We've had an awful season, sacking a proven manager and
replacing him with a muppet 
*   Samba is injured 
*   Or as one Blackburn fan says:  Actually, this is a must win
game. Can we win it?  Very very unlikely.   The die was cast in December
as i've said before.   The club is disastrously managed at all levels
now and the outcome is inevitable. 

See, the sh1te coloured glasses work for everyone.  It's more a
reflection of being a football fan than it is about Wolves ability.  


On 16 May 2011 10:15, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:


Look at it this way, if you were a Blackburn fan,  we would be
one of the teams you would want to play.
 
There's going to be a surprsie somewhere, its happened all year.
If all the results go according to the table we will be fine whatever
happens against Blackburn, because all those around us SHOULD loose as
well.
 
It doesn't work like that thoughjust as well we've won our
last two though isn't it?



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 10:09 

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]


Out of Light, Cometh Darkness.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]



But unless my memory is failing me we have a long and
distinguished record in helping teams break their long losing streaks or
improving their disastrous away records.  Just because they are
struggling doesn't mean we don't have it in us to capitulate.  We
haven't won 3 matches in a row since April 2009 (in the Championship,
not the Premier League).

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet [sec=unclassified]

 

Such negativity

*   Birmingham away at Spurs, who are playing for a spot in
the Europa 
*   Blackburn's away record is as bad as ours.  4 losses and
2 draws in the last 6 games. 
*   Blackpool have to beat Manure at OT.  They haven't lost
there all season.  They might play their second string but their 25 man
squad is superb.  I don't think the argument of caring about their
record is valid but they'll certainly want to win in home. 
*   Stoke have nothing to play for, I agree but, they
haven't had anything to play for for a while and yet have still won two
of the last three.  Wigan beat the worst team in the league by one goal.

*   I'd be low more worried if I supported Wigan, Blues,
Blackpool or Blackburn 
*   Odds of three wins in a row are small, but fortunately
the outcome of this game is not related to the result in the other two
so we don't have to worry about those odds. 

 

On 16 May 2011 07:08, Morris, Lee SGT
lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:

I really do fear for us now. If West Ham had held on for at
least a draw we would have been ok. Istill in our hands but what odds on
three wins in a row? Plus our record against Blackburn is terrible, and
all the others play sides who have absolutely nowt play for.

 

$100 on relegation would offset it if it did happen.

 





From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 06:58
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Bet

William Hill have us at $9 to go down.  What time do they open
the book again in Australia?  Got to be worth a few bob if the same odds
are on offer here.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves

[NSWolves] The Final Hurdle [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-09 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Just looking at the remaining fixtures for all the teams in the
relegation fight. 
 
The current points are
 
Blackburn 39 - If they loose to Man U on Saturday, and us Blackpool and
Wigan win they could need to beat us to survive,  
Birminghham 39 - Still have to paly Spurs and Fulham, both could go
either way, but i think they may need a point
Wolves 37 - 
Blackpool 36 - Two tough games against Bolton and man U, I think they
are gone
Wigan 36 - West Ham and Stoke, again games that could go either way but
I think they are gone
West Ham 33 - Two very winnable games against Wigan and Sunderland
worries me
 
Out of the six teams in the dog fight Blackburn and Blackpool both have
to face Man U, so lets assume they have a maximum of three points
available to them (although both could possibly take points off Man U).
My choice for the drop simply because I don't think either will beat Man
U.
 
West Ham have to win this weekend to survive, if they do beat Wigan, I
think we will have to beat Sunderland or Blackburn to stay up.
 
In other words, we definately need one more win or two draws to stay up,
and I hope its this weekend, because the last day fixtures fill me with
dread.
 
So, Blackpool and Wigan for the drop, with the last spot between West
Ham, Blackburn and Us. Serious pressure.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-08 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
 
I am not taking anything whatsover away from the performance,
particularly in the first half. HOWEVER, the scoreline doesn't tell the
true story of the whole game. We were very very lucky at times in the
secomd half.  
 We need one of those Odenwatsits badly. 
Fletcher had a bliner and has won over quite a number of people with
that performance.
Hunt really got in there faces, he'd be an annoying little bugga to play
against.
Guideora always puts in a good shift and definately gave them something
to think about.
 
When the team sheet came out I was gobsmacked that both Jarvis and
Milijas were on tghe bench, but for once Mad Mick's tactics
worked...JUST. 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 9 May 2011 10:26
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion


I went to bed at half time as I have a stinking cold.  It was an
excellent first half performance, from an odd team selection.  Where
have these performances been the last month?
 
Fletcher, Guediora and Hunt were excellent.  Hunt chased everything.
Fletcher is a good footballer in lots of ways.
 
One win now should be enough.  We might get away with not needing much
else anyway
 
Blackpool have Bolton and Manure
Wigan have Stoke and West Ham
West Ham have Sunderland and Wigan (come on West Ham)
 
 
 


 
On 9 May 2011 09:42, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote:


You're psychic Paul ! 


On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:42 PM, paul
pcr...@contechengineering.com wrote:


Cometh the hour cometh the man.

Fletcher to score 2, Wolves to win 3 - 1!

Out of Darkness Cometh Light!

--Original Message--
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion
Sent: 2 May 2011 17:44

Jeremy, I was at Mass on Sunday, my prayers are not
being answered. I even generously contributed twice to the collections.
I will ask Father Brian if he can help.

--Original Message--
From: Jeremy Tonks
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion
Sent: 2 May 2011 17:32

Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the
middleman and talk directly yourself!!
 
Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I
hadn't banked but (but had publicly hoped for).
 
It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll
probably still come down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble
over Wigan and Blackpool to survival.
 
 
A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up.
Walsall won and only need a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final
win would see them promoted. Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will
still be relegated. Wolves...? Glad I don't get to watch the tripe
they've dealt out in recent weeks.
 
From:nswolves@googlegroups.com
mailto:from%3answol...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Monday,
2 May 2011 2:45 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves]
Team for Albion
 
On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a
totally inept and impotent performance!
 
I admire some of your continued optimism but my rose
coloured glasses now lie smashed on the floor. Time to wake up to the
reality that we are going down, only a miracle can save us! Over to you
Jeremy!
 
Paul Crowe
Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
 
ConTech (Sydney Office)
 
PO Box 3517
Rhodes Waterside
Rhodes NSW  2138
Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
Mob: 0406009562
Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 
 
From:nswolves@googlegroups.com
mailto:from%3answol...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent:
Monday, 2 May 2011 2:09 PM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for
Albion
 
Has he ever taken off Henry? I don't think I've ever
seen him subbed. Would like to have seen Henry subbed by Guedioura on 65
mins last night.
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:25:57 +1000 Subject: [NSWolves]
Team for Albion From: millward@gmail.com To:

RE: [NSWolves] Baggies [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-04 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
 

* Win/lose/draw;  WIN 

* scoreline;  2-1 

* heroes = BEER AH to finally unearth all his natural talent
villains = All the fans who doubted the sublime footballing skills of
Karp Henry

* staying up/going down;  Staying up if we win. Down if we
loose. 

* good crowd/bad crowd;  Very good, no motivation needed for
this one. 

* Mick making a substitution before the 80th minute Not unless
BEER AH gets sent off for holding 

* Etc, etc, etc  The one game I view with trepedation, and I'm
dreading it even more this time for obvious reasons. 

  So based on my assumptions relating to the religous banter that as
taken place this week, if Rog wins a fortune on Saturday afternoon,
Wolves are fookin doomed...meaning, not even the great Macarthy can save
us atheists from championship football.



 

It's crunch time gentlemen... let's get excited!!!

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


RE: [NSWolves] RE: Baggies [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-04 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Is it a Sunday game



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 12:13
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] RE: Baggies



I would suggest a get together to watch it (9pm Sunday), but don't want
you guys to see me cry.

 



 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 12:05 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Baggies

 

Has anyone noticed that our fixture list has us playing against our
BIGGEST and most HATED rivals this weekend, in a game that is likely to
decide whether or not we are a Premier League team next season??

 

With no disrespect intended to our members who are intrigued by or
wedded to any given religious faction, I'm keen to hear what people
actually think is going to happen on Sunday?  

* Win/lose/draw;

* scoreline;

* heroes/villains;

* staying up/going down;

* good crowd/bad crowd;

* Mick making a substitution before the 80th minute

* Etc, etc, etc

 

It's crunch time gentlemen... let's get excited!!!

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.




CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and
may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re
Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other
defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be
the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable
for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the
contents of this message.


-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


RE: [NSWolves] sorry to interrupt...[sec=unclassified]

2011-05-03 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
No, lets get back to politics and religionOsama on the left wing,
Usama on the rightdeadly combination.
 
Hamill for PM 


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 4 May 2011 11:24
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] sorry to interrupt...


Let's hope it doesn't go to his head like it did with Jarvis


On 4 May 2011 11:21, mark worrall markworr...@gmail.com wrote:


but did anyone notice Hammill got named in the England U21s  ?


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13273721.stm



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-02 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I must be the only one who thinks O'Hara as done very little since
scoring the goal against Albion. Is David Jones fit? I'd prefer him.
Hamill seems to do ok everytime I've seen him, why did Mick drop him in
the first place?



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 09:21
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion


Henessey-
FoleyMancienneCraddockElokobi
Hammill---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis
-Fletcher

Whens E-Blake fit again ?


On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com
wrote:


My choice:
 
Henessey-
FoleyStearmanCraddockGeorge
Hunt---Guedioura---O'Hara---Milijas---Jarvis
-Fletcher
 
 
Chance of it being picked:
 
0%



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion [sec=unclassified]

2011-05-02 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
Right now I'm much more worried about the many millions of lunatic
followers Osama Bin Laden has left behind to cause death and
destruction.
What is Gods purpose in all of that nonsense?



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 13:38
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion



I'm happy to be corrected but I would suspect that the vast majority of
those 2 million children would not be part of a Christian
society/nation, so the God of which Jeremy speaks is unlikely to help
them.  That's not to say that they don't have their own 'spiritual'
leader/icon that may or may not have let them down.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 1:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

Still, it seems a trifle unfair that two million children worldwide are
forced to work as prostitutes and barely know anything else, when God
could end it all with a wave of the wand.  I'm sure even if they knew
about Jesus, it would be of little comfort whilst they are getting
beaten and sodomized.

On 3 May 2011 13:00, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote:

I may get to a longer response... but probably not...

 

The standard argument goes something like: If God is all powerful and
all loving how come there is suffering in the world?

The basic premise is flawed from my point of view. I'd respond something
like:

If God is all powerful and all loving and there is suffering in the
world then God must have an important purpose involving suffering.

 

As in all theological discussions Jesus needs be kept at the centre -
and there he is as soon you raise the issue of suffering.

 

God's purposes in creation are centred on Jesus. Jesus' own suffering,
death and resurrection are the guarantee that, when he returns, death
will have no power and suffering will be ended. Forever.

 

There's my briefest theodicy. I can trust God now and into the future
because of what Jesus has done in the past.

 

I'll just duck down while you all start shooting...

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 10:17 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

You'd better give us a run down on your views on theodicy then Jeremy.
I don't think most of us get it.

On 3 May 2011 09:53, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote:

Your lack of experience in these matters is getting the best of you Rog.
You should experiment more. I am convinced that it is very effective (in
important matters!).

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog  Reet 


Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2011 7:27 AM

To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

If you blokes had spoken to wiser heads on this list you'd have known
that praying is just like Mick.

A total waste of time as it's guaranteed to achieve  all.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 8:12 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

I've been going to mass and my prayers aren't being answered - I think
I'll go back to being Anglican!

 

Too cup focussed - and the ^*%*() opposition is too good (but I did
beat Chelseadrid yesterday - J J

 

JT

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 7:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

You can't let the Wombat's drop down to V.  It's only bots and newbies
in there.  What's gone wrong?

On 2 May 2011 17:32, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote:

Don't look at me Paul - I suggest you cut out the middleman and talk
directly yourself!!

 

Marcus is right - the only positive was a point that I hadn't banked but
(but had publicly hoped for).

 

It was an away game - this Sunday is huge. But it'll probably still come
down to a win against Blackburn so that we scramble over Wigan and
Blackpool to survival.

 

 

A bit disappointed - all my ducks were lining up. Walsall won and only
need a draw to survive. Shrewsbury won and a final win would see them
promoted. Bundanoon Wombats had a shock win and will still be relegated.
Wolves...? Glad I don't get to watch the tripe they've dealt out in
recent weeks.

 



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Crowe


Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 2:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Team for Albion

 

On reflection we were worse than clueless, it was a totally 

RE: [NSWolves] Stoke [sec=unclassified]

2011-04-26 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
We are playing terrible...I can't work out how Doyle's injury can make
so much difference.
Its all well and good saying we need six points to stay up...but I can't
see where the next point is coming from, we drew with Fulham despite
them over running is.
We are very very bad right nowthe back four are horrendous...fark
the positive crap...bring on the points deduction next year after the
fans riot when West Brom put the nail in the coffin.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 09:00
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Stoke


Come on now chaps.  We've had a bad run.  We've had good runs.  We'll
get enough points to stay up.  Two wins in the upcoming derbies will be
enough.


On 27 April 2011 08:11, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au
wrote:


1st goal was a re-run of Everton's 1st the other week.
Osman/Pennant down the right with a ball played into our box whereby a
six foot something striker (Beckford/Jones) manages to somehow go
unnoticed and find himself with space between 2 defenders. Easy header,
1-0.
 
I've not read McCarthy's post match interview but I could pretty
much recite it word for word I reckon. Plenty of praise for his players
and claims that if we stick together and show the spirit (absent in
games, presumably evident in training?) he knows we have, we will stay
up. Other teams have to pick up points you know (which is not actually
true and won't be necessary the way we're going). Its like watching
Sunderland get relegated all over again.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Stoke



Going down!

MM out!

Marcus and Rog were right!

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
mailto:pcr...@contechengineering.com 

Website: www.contechengineering.com
http://www.contechengineering.com/ 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:22 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Stoke

 

Excellent team selection and great performance.  We've been
really unlucky tonight.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT
NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain
legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is
waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not
responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or
attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you
receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your
system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any
part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. 



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what
would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.



-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


  1   2   3   4   >