[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-09 Thread Steven Millward
ay, 9 October 2009 4:08 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified] > > Marcus wrote: *(unless I'm trying to get Mick McCarthy sacked)* > > So you two can spend more time together? > Or has he not been returning your calls? &g

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Jeremy Tonks
ps.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Friday, 9 October 2009 4:12 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified] he's left me high and dry, assumably so he can spend more time practicing that pathetic arm waving he d

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Marcus Chantry
: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 9 October 2009 4:08 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified] Marcus wrote: (unless I'm trying to get Mick McCarthy sacked) So you two can spend mor

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Steven Millward
iday, 9 October 2009 12:28 PM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified] > > General view on things. He's been banned from every Wolves forum on the > planet because of his attitude and I don't think NSWolves should be

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Marcus Chantry
as Darrell. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 9 October 2009 12:28 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified] General view on things. He's been banned from every Wolv

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Paul Taylor
PMSL - I nearly choked therebut too true Marcus. There's only one doom and gloom hat here, and it's all yours. Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:28:25 +1100 Subject: [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified] From: millward@gmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com General view

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Steven Millward
m] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Friday, 9 October 2009 11:21 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified] > > Can people please delete Darrell's messages from the bottom of their > emails before replying. >

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Marcus Chantry
consider the environment before printing this email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Friday, 9 October 2009 11:21 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec

[NSWolves] Re: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Steven Millward
Can people please delete Darrell's messages from the bottom of their emails before replying. 2009/10/9 Morris, Lee SGT > I watched four games whilst in the UK recently and its rather strange > trying to work out this team. > > For me there are obvioulsly several passengers, players simply no

[NSWolves] RE: too true...[sec=unclassified]

2009-10-08 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
I watched four games whilst in the UK recently and its rather strange trying to work out this team. For me there are obvioulsly several passengers, players simply not good enough, amongst them the obvious ones are Halford, Keogh, and probably Elokobi, I say probably because he looked ok against H