RE: [NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-16 Thread Paul Taylor

Could be a media ploy. 

Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:17:38 +1100
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: millward@gmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

I thought Benitez had publicly ruled himself out?


On 16 February 2012 15:38, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:



UNCLASSIFIED
The Scousers are coming, Jewell or a dramatic return for dithering DJ???
 
Heard another version of events, Curbishley or Benitez.
 
This I'll take the latter.
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is 
subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have 
received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and 
delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!





-- 

Boo! Clipboard out!
  

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


[NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-15 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED

The Scousers are coming, Jewell or a dramatic return for dithering
DJ???
 
Heard another version of events, Curbishley or Benitez.
 
This I'll take the latter.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


Re: [NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-15 Thread Steven Millward
I thought Benitez had publicly ruled himself out?

On 16 February 2012 15:38, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.auwrote:

 **

 *UNCLASSIFIED*
 The Scousers are coming, Jewell or a dramatic return for dithering
 DJ???

 Heard another version of events, Curbishley or Benitez.

 This I'll take the latter.

 *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
 and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If
 you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the
 sender and delete the email.

 --
 Boo! Clipboard out!


-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


RE: [NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-15 Thread Jeremy Tonks
I think it's either Curbishley or Clipboard. 

I know what my preference is.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2012 4:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

I thought Benitez had publicly ruled himself out?

On 16 February 2012 15:38, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
wrote:

UNCLASSIFIED

The Scousers are coming, Jewell or a dramatic return for dithering DJ???

 

Heard another version of events, Curbishley or Benitez.

 

This I'll take the latter.

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and
is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you
have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender
and delete the email.

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

 

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


Re: [NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-15 Thread Paul Hart
It's Curbishley !!! 

Sent from my iPhone

On 16/02/2012, at 4:24 PM, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote:

 I think it’s either Curbishley or Clipboard.
 I know what my preference is…
  
  
 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of Steven Millward
 Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2012 4:18 PM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Scouse Attack [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  
 I thought Benitez had publicly ruled himself out?
 
 On 16 February 2012 15:38, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:
 UNCLASSIFIED
 
 The Scousers are coming, Jewell or a dramatic return for dithering DJ???
  
 Heard another version of events, Curbishley or Benitez.
  
 This I'll take the latter.
 IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and 
 is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you 
 have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender 
 and delete the email.
 
 -- 
 Boo! Clipboard out!
  
 -- 
 Boo! Clipboard out!
 -- 
 Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!