Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
If clipboard leads us to victory on Saturday then he should keep the job until the end of the season. We can then take our time to find the right candidate based on whichever division we are in. Sent from my iPhone On 21/02/2012, at 10:59 AM, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.au wrote: I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
http://www.thesackrace.com/teams/wolverhampton-wanderers Wonder if they've a market on who'll be favourite for the job tomorrow. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:00 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! Logo http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
If I wasn't a staunch WW fan this might be fun. We've seen some excellent analysis in this forum over the last week or so (thanks Matthew L especially). I hope he's right about the lack of leaking and the press having to invent. But I really think it's managerial incompetence that has us not having a manager ready to walk in when they sack the manager. One of my Everton mates dropped Keane's name this morning as if it was a done deal - no one has any idea. .including the board L Clippy may be the man - if he can beat 'castle then folk will follow him a long way but I'm sure Rog will bring that lead balloon down with the odds agin it happening. The list of betting odds on managers is interesting - there's some promise among them and my reservations are mainly personal prejudice about who's worked at whatever club I hate more than Brighton etc. I guess Poyet is not feasible - could Wolves afford to pay out the remaining 5 years of his 5 year contract? I can't guess what any of them could do with this squad, no money and Morgan in their ear. . I can safely say that, at this stage of the season, I wouldn't want the job. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] http://www.thesackrace.com/teams/wolverhampton-wanderers Wonder if they've a market on who'll be favourite for the job tomorrow. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:00 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! Description: Image removed by sender. Logo Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! image002.jpg
Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Not only second interviews but new people joining the race. I can only think that Curbishley wasn't offered the funds to build a side capable of staying up. Maybe the Prem is not for our owner? On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.auwrote: ** I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] *UNCLASSIFIED* Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! [image: Logo] Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
It's looking more like Morgan had a bust up with Mick and lost his blob. Good business sense that. On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.auwrote: ** I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] *UNCLASSIFIED* Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! [image: Logo] Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED They haven't got a f-ckin clue. Its the same as when we are trying to sign players...We aren't going anywhere until they release the purse strings a little more...I bet our water tight budget is what put Curbishley off. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:46 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] It's looking more like Morgan had a bust up with Mick and lost his blob. Good business sense that. On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.au wrote: I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! Logohttp://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I can't think what else it could be but money that put Curbishley off Really, the Prem is not a place to be tight with money. Morgan should find a buyer if he hasn't got the stomach for it. Unless the FFP rules change things there's little point trying to compete. On 21 February 2012 13:54, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.auwrote: ** *UNCLASSIFIED* They haven't got a f-ckin clue. Its the same as when we are trying to sign players...We aren't going anywhere until they release the purse strings a little more...I bet our water tight budget is what put Curbishley off. *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:46 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] It's looking more like Morgan had a bust up with Mick and lost his blob. Good business sense that. On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.auwrote: ** I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] *UNCLASSIFIED* Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! [image: Logo] Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
My feeling is Morgan will finish his housing project and then get the flock out ! He has no real interest in our club ! Sent from my iPhone On 21/02/2012, at 1:58 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: I can't think what else it could be but money that put Curbishley off Really, the Prem is not a place to be tight with money. Morgan should find a buyer if he hasn't got the stomach for it. Unless the FFP rules change things there's little point trying to compete. On 21 February 2012 13:54, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: UNCLASSIFIED They haven't got a f-ckin clue. Its the same as when we are trying to sign players...We aren't going anywhere until they release the purse strings a little more...I bet our water tight budget is what put Curbishley off. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:46 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] It's looking more like Morgan had a bust up with Mick and lost his blob. Good business sense that. On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.au wrote: I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there. In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories. The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to go by, that's not really surprising though. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now. So much for good planning.. A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue... Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.not exactly inspiring...think i'd take McDermott. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- Boo! Curbishley out! Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!