RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.[sec=unclassified]

2010-02-10 Thread Jeremy Tonks
AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.[sec=unclassified] The one after that is the most important (Bolton), with Pompey all but gone there are about six teams fighting the drop, results against the fellow strugglers combined with the odd surprise like tonight's will

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.[sec=unclassified]

2010-02-10 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
s.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Thursday, 11 February 2010 07:54 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. That's right Steve, just who are we playing next game? From: nswolves@google

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread pcrowe
Thick Mick gets a reprieve!! Great result! _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 7:31 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. Boo! Thick Mick out ay it

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Jeremy Tonks
How dire must Wigan, Hull and Burnley be to worse goal differences than ours? _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 11 February 2010 8:52 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Jeremy Tonks
That's right Steve, just who are we playing next game? _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Thursday, 11 February 2010 8:52 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. Come on p

Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Steven Millward
e it as far as > > Prem. standard is concerned. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On > > Behalf > > Of rognr...@exemail.com.au > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 12:28 PM > > To:

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread rognreet
gt;> City >> offer potential European football and probably twice as much in wages! >> >> >> >> _ >> >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On >> Behalf >> Of Marcus Chantry >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 Fe

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Paul Taylor
At this time of morning, I'd say I left Jones out eh?? Get in! > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:45:53 +1100 > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. > From: rognr...@exemail.com.au > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > > Who did you deliberately leave out to see if we&#

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Jeremy Tonks
PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. You think we can win with just ten players? You've been reading too many Billy The Fishes I think. On 10 February 2010 20:49, Paul Taylor wrote: Double over Spurs with this lineup. Hahnemann Zubar, Craddock, B

Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Steven Millward
jas, Jarvis, > Doyle > > > > > From: pcr...@contechengineering.com > > > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. > > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:58:01 +1100 > > > > > After over half a season I find myself almost agreeing w

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread rognreet
; >> From: pcr...@contechengineering.com >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. >> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:58:01 +1100 >> >> After over half a season I find myself almost agreeing with you Roger, >> our >> play of late

Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Raymond Orr
gt; > > > > From: pcr...@contechengineering.com > > > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. > > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:58:01 +1100 > > > > > After over half a season I find myself almost agreeing with you Roger, > our > >

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Paul Taylor
Double over Spurs with this lineup. Hahnemann Zubar, Craddock, Berra, Ward (Stearman) Guedioura, Henry, Milijas, Jarvis, Doyle > From: pcr...@contechengineering.com > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12

Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-10 Thread Steven Millward
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of rognr...@exemail.com.au > Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 12:28 PM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. > > Wages and the chance to play European foot

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-09 Thread pcrowe
y, 10 February 2010 12:28 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. Wages and the chance to play European football would have influenced his choice. What really convinced him to go to Shitty was he wasn't asked to play out of position every week, nor was he asked h

Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-09 Thread Steven Millward
ntry > *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:35 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. > > > > which is why he went to Man City rather than us. > > > > *Marcus Chantry* |* ** Associate Director* > > *Senior Product Manag

Re: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-09 Thread Steven Millward
> City > > offer potential European football and probably twice as much in wages! > > > > > > > > _ > > > > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On > > Behalf > > Of Marcus Chantry > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:35

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-09 Thread rognreet
ooglegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Marcus Chantry > Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:35 AM > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. > > > > which is why he went to Man City rather than us. > > >

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-09 Thread pcrowe
ooglegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:35 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson. which is why he went to Man City rather than us. Marcus Chantry | Associate Director Senior Product Mana

RE: [NSWolves] Adam Johnson.

2010-02-09 Thread Marcus Chantry
which is why he went to Man City rather than us. Marcus Chantry | Associate Director Senior Product Manager - Macquarie Life Level 3, 1 Shelley Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia T +61 2 8232 4259 | M 0448 887 627 E marcus.chan...@macquarie.com P Please consider the environment b