Re: [BTMO] 89th minute

2011-02-02 Thread mark worrall
I think that was forced as Hammill looked like he had an injury. I'd rather see SEB starting anyway than Doyle. On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > Let’s bring on a striker to try and win the game. Should be plenty of > time. > > > > > > *Marcus Chantry ** > **Associate Dire

RE: [BTMO] 89th minute

2011-02-02 Thread Rog & Reet
Was that the attempted 80 yard back pass in the first half or the one for the goal? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Crowe Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 9:05 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] 89th minute Or make the

RE: [BTMO] 89th minute

2011-02-02 Thread Paul Crowe
Or make the worst back pass of the season!! What was he thinking? We were marginally the better team for most of this game. Hammill showed some very good touches and Doyle was better than recent games, unlucky to hit the post. New then it was not going to be our night! Paul Crowe S

Re: [BTMO] 89th minute

2011-02-02 Thread Marcus Chantry
But there's no point complaining as the board will never sack him. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Sent: Thu Feb 03 08:59:24 2011 Subject: RE: [BTMO] 89th minute Yeah that’d be right – plenty of time for the *(&

RE: [BTMO] 89th minute

2011-02-02 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Yeah that'd be right - plenty of time for the *(&**&( s to score a 98th minute winner! _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 8:50 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] 89th minute