Are you sure it is the TFM file that is out of date? Or might it be a
PK
font?
No, it is a (postscript) font I'm creating myself, so there is no
pk-file. I'm having the same trouble again this morning: edited
pfb-file, saved, new file is used in pdftex testfont, Context is still
using the old
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
[...]
According to to the statements from Walter Schmidt, a TeX font expert
(perhaps I should say *the* TeX font expert?) in
http://tug.daimi.au.dk/archives/tex-fonts/msg01328.html
\quote{%
Note, however, that embedding of URW's fonts,
Hm, I have never been a programmer.
Willi
Pavel wrote:
Your solution works, but I've figured out a very simple, though probably
not very elegant one:
defined \def\dictind#1{\startDictEntry{#1}\index{#1}} and replaced all
\startDictEntry w/ \dictind.
Hi,
George White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hans has demonstated that even the Adobe fonts don't have the same
metrics.
Which fonts, which characters and which metrics. Please be more
specific, since it might not even touch the way TeX handles fonts.
I am not sure what is taken to create the
At 11:07 08/10/2003, you wrote:
Are you sure it is the TFM file that is out of date? Or might it be a PK
font?
No, it is a (postscript) font I'm creating myself, so there is no pk-file.
I'm having the same trouble again this morning: edited pfb-file, saved,
new file is used in pdftex testfont,
