Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Pittman wrote:
G'day Hans.
Hints about that, or a native TeX method[1], would be very much
appreciated. At the moment it is a relatively slow process of manual
trial and error.
this is something tex is pretty good at and it runs as fast as normal
On 12/2/05, olivier Turlier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The command # gzip -dc tetex-texmf.tar.gz \| (umask 0; cd
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf-dist;tar xvf -)
was impossible : bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
I've tried , as a blind experiment : remove parenthesis, umask
I think the answer is zero or nearly zero. If you have a bit of
patience, I can do a port of tipa.sty (quite easy), but it will
take some time before I can start on it.
in the process taco and i can discuss low level support issues as
well; it's all a matter of demand and time; of course after
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hi,
In my account, ConTeXt works no prob, I got a perfect PDF.
My problem occurs when I run ConTeXt via web, under Apache's user of course.
How to trace ConTeXt run under web server ?
Reversing the order will hopefully give a clue on how to proceed:
make ConTeXt
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Perhaps this is a stupid question, but do we need more than some
definitions in the Unicode encoding vectors and typescripts for some
fonts?
Is (T)IPA support about more than using some phonetic chars?
Please enlighten me.
AFAICT, there are:
- 2 new font
Le Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:12:39 +0100, VnPenguin a écrit :
On 12/2/05, olivier Turlier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The command # gzip -dc tetex-texmf.tar.gz \| (umask 0; cd
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf-dist;tar xvf -)
was impossible : bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
I've
2005/12/2, Renaud AUBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
Is there someone using GNU Emacs with ConTeXt. After some googlelyzing, I've
learnt :
1. ConTeXt mode from Berend de Boer is now included in AucTeX
2. Some people use Emacs with ConTeXt and METAPOST, but with special .el
files that seems
I was probing into the font variant mechanism.
This did not work, th Light font could not be made to typeset:
\starttypescript [calligraphy] [mathtimeyy] [name]
\definefontsynonym [CalligraphyRegular] [Calligraphy]
\definefontsynonym [Calligraphy] [MathTimes-Calligraphy]
Quoting Adam Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hans Hagen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For information: I've tried to type them directly on my keybord.
They apear on my screen but the final pdf document output black
rectangles. (I'm sure that all what I use is configured to use and
produce
I am confused about the behaviour of \cal and calligraphic.
In a font where the calligraphic letters are in MathItalic all goes
well.
But, in a font where the calligraphic letters come from another font
I get:
\definefontsynonym [Calligraphic] [FONT_OTHER_THAN_MathSymbol]
in text:
--- On Dec 2, Mojca Miklavec wrote ---
1. What's the best way to frame a formula like here:
\placeformula
\startformula
\mframed{x^2+y^2=z^2}
\stopformula
The problem is that:
- formula number is shifted downwards in comparison to the formula
without a number
- I don't know how to do the
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I was probing into the font variant mechanism.
QUESTION: Is the variant mechanism exclusively tied to the series Serif
(\rm) and Sans (\ss)?
Yes, pretty much, in the implementation's design.
If otherwise, what am I doing wrong then?
Nothing. Except, is that Math
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
It would require very little programming. syntax/2html.vim, which
converts the buffer to a HTML document with syntax highlighting, is 526
lines in the current CVS incarnation. A syntax/2context.vim would be
even shorter, perhaps 150 to 200 lines. If I find the time
13 matches
Mail list logo
