On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex
handle that quite well. however, in xetex,
Fengnan Gao wrote:
Does it behave any differently if you try to replace the luatex binary
inside tex/texmf-mswin/bin with the extracted luatex from
http://foundry.supelec.fr/frs/download.php/707/luatex-beta-0.31.2-win32-mingw.zip?
Mojca (with zero ideas left)
Nope, Mojca, not working
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Fengnan Gao wrote:
Does it behave any differently if you try to replace the luatex binary
inside tex/texmf-mswin/bin with the extracted luatex from
http://foundry.supelec.fr/frs/download.php/707/luatex-beta-0.31.2-win32-mingw.zip?
Mojca (with zero ideas
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I
Hi, Hans:
When trk is replaced by TRK it works OK in XeTeX.
Thanks! So I think we should support lowercase code for xetex as well
for api consistency?
LuaTeX/MKIV use lowercase labels.
Then we can get similar output using the same tex file.
Yue Wang
Hi, Jonathan:
Thanks for the analysis! Now I replace the trk with TRK, and xetex
output is right.
In the LuaTeX case, I don't think *any* ligatures are enabled by default, so
the language is irrelevant; notice that there's no ff ligature in your
output either, even though this should be
Hi Mojca,
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
!luaTeX error (file
/tmp/context/tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/lm/lmroman12-regular.otf):
Parsing CFF DICT failed. (error=-1)
I can almost certainly reproduce this, I see an uninitialized variable
in valgrind. More about this later, but this is *not* the
Alan STONE wrote:
I did a clean minimals install on my Windows XP Home SP3 system and
get the same strange output.
ConTeXt ver: 2008.11.10 21:40 MKIV fmt: 2008.12.22 int: english/english
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.31.2-2008121200, build 1659
texmfstart texexec --lua hello
context.cmd
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Fengnan Gao fnst...@hotmail.com wrote:
I just installed ConTeXtMinimal using first-setup.bat. But it seems it
has some serious bug that context even couldn't deal with such a easy
document:
\starttext
Hello world!
\stoptext
What's the problem? Anybody
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Derek CORDEIRO derekcorde...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Fengnan Gao fnst...@hotmail.com wrote:
I just installed ConTeXtMinimal using first-setup.bat. But it seems it
has some serious bug that context even couldn't deal with such a easy
Hi all,
This turned out to be an endianness bug in the TFM reader.
You can expect mpost 1.102 tomorrow.
Best wishes,
Taco
Hans van der Meer wrote:
NASTY PROBLEM WITH READING TFM FILES IN LATEST METAPOST
A nasty problem has surfaced that Taco Hoekwater cannot solve, because
it does not
Salaam, Khaled,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:51:56 -0700, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org
wrote:
I'm trying to typeset an Arabic book with Arabic bibliography, I'm using
bib module, but bibtex doesn't support unicode. Any workaround or another
alternative?
Can you port your database to bbl
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
2.
it would be convenient if LuaTeX supported typescripts like XeTeX does
instead of having to define font synonyms, e.g.,
\definetypeface[mainface][rm][Xserif][Warnock Pro]
\definetypeface[mainface][ss][Xsans][Cronos
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Does it behave any differently if you try to replace the luatex binary
inside tex/texmf-mswin/bin with the extracted luatex from
http://foundry.supelec.fr/frs/download.php/707/luatex-beta-0.31.2-win32-mingw.zip?
I would love to know the answer to this question as well.
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Alan STONE wrote:
I did a clean minimals install on my Windows XP Home SP3 system and
get the same strange output.
ConTeXt ver: 2008.11.10 21:40 MKIV fmt: 2008.12.22 int: english/english
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.31.2-2008121200, build 1659
texmfstart texexec
Am 23.12.2008 um 18:44 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
Tell us next time what a package is supposed to do.
\setuplayout
[backspace=1in,
width=middle,
topspace=1in,
header=0pt,
footer=0pt,
height=middle]
Am 23.12.2008 um 18:44 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
file name=example.tex
\usemodule[fullpage][style={cm,empty}]
%\showframe
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext
/file
file name=p-fullpage.tex
%D \module
%D [
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time.
They work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the 2008 version
I've found that some math symbols are shuffled or simply do not
appear in the pdf. For example, \midint compiles correctly but do not
appear
sorry i'm stealing your thread, but i'm thinking of buying the lucida
fonts with maths, which version works with luatex and which one works
with mkii, please provide a link for both.
Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time.
Am 23.12.2008 um 21:07 schrieb Jerónimo Alaminos Prats:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time.
They work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the 2008
version I've found that some math symbols are shuffled or simply do
not appear in the pdf.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time. They
work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the 2008 version I've found
that some math symbols are shuffled or simply do not appear in the pdf. For
Hi, all
Can I roll back and use the old version when context isn't broken? I have
several documents which need to be processed ASAP. Thanks.
Fengnan Gao
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
Well, he use pdftex to process the file.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time. They
work like a charm with mactex 2007 but
tug version will work in both mkiv and mkii. (I mean luatex 0.30.0)
in the future I think we should suggest TUG to distribute opentype
version of the font (including converting the math glyphs into
opentype math table).
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Mohamed Bana
mbana.li...@googlemail.com
Concerning the second question, the following is the reply from Hans
months ago to me.
I think Hans is right, since fonts are quite complex, but it *will* be
a lot easier if we have that mechanism since this mechanism will be
applicable to most fonts.
If there are fonts that fontconfig cannot
Hi,
Playing with metafun, I saw the FunnyFrame example (page 239 MetaFun
screen manual), where a framed is put around some paragraph and this
frame has a small framed title inserted at the top of the framed
paragraph. I would like to do a similar output but in the context of
an
26 matches
Mail list logo
