Hi!
It didn't work.
After starting, an cmd window opened and I got 2 error messages:
Update failed Error code: 1
Make failed Error code:1
So I keep my present version.
Alain
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky a écrit :
It will not interfere if you uncheck Set env. vars globally option
during
Hi!
Strange.
Do you use proxy? Any other peculiarity in your configuration?
Vyatcheslav
It didn't work.
After starting, an cmd window opened and I got 2 error messages:
Update failed Error code: 1
Make failed Error code:1
So I keep my present version.
Hello Alain,
C:\contextfirst-setup
'ruby' n'est pas reconnu en tant que commande interne
ou externe, un programme exécutable ou un fichier de commandes.
looks like you're missing ruby.
You need to install Ruby first (if you want to use pdfTeX or XeTeX).
Fetching files anyway.
rsync: failed
Hi,
with the actual beta the compilation of a simple letter stops with:
Undefined control sequence.
\defineblankmethod[\v!nobreak] {\penalty\plustenthousand}
(in default.nli, line 707
\usemodule[letter]
\starttext
\startletter
Hello World
\stopletter
\stoptext
Greetings,
Andreas
Hi!
First, sorry to have sent the previous message twice. I didn't check for
the sending email, received a bounce, resent to discover it passed to
the list.
I have downloaded a great part of the documentation (59 files or so).
But if I understood well, there has been big changes between Mark
Hi list,
the following example works in MkII but not in MkIV as expected:
\defineenumeration[test][%
way=bysection,
location=left,
text=Test]
\starttext
\section{One}
\starttest
\input knuth
\stoptest
\section{Two}
\starttest
\input knuth
\stoptest
\stoptext
In MkII I get 1.1 and
Hi!
Patrick Gundlach a écrit :
Hello Alain,
C:\contextfirst-setup
'ruby' n'est pas reconnu en tant que commande interne
ou externe, un programme exécutable ou un fichier de commandes.
looks like you're missing ruby.
I'll do not need Ruby and I think it is not necessary for installations!
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
test graphic is the same as in
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20090901.094156.1dc47c81.en.html
no such message here
So you should be able to produce the error with that example. The
last time I simply used the old (commented) definition
Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
with the actual beta the compilation of a simple letter stops with:
Undefined control sequence.
\defineblankmethod[\v!nobreak] {\penalty\plustenthousand}
(in default.nli, line 707
\usemodule[letter]
\starttext
\startletter
Hello World
\stopletter
\stoptext
Alain Delmotte wrote:
I have downloaded a great part of the documentation (59 files or so).
But if I understood well, there has been big changes between Mark II and
Mark IV/Lua.
The documentation seems more linked to MkII.
Is mk.pdf the file to use (in conjonction with another?)?
mk is the
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
test graphic is the same as in
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20090901.094156.1dc47c81.en.html
no such message here
So you should be able to produce the error with that example. The
last time I simply used the old
Am 17.09.2009 um 16:03 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
with the actual beta the compilation of a simple letter stops with:
Undefined control sequence.
\defineblankmethod[\v!nobreak] {\penalty\plustenthousand}
(in default.nli, line 707
\usemodule[letter]
\starttext
\startletter
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
test graphic is the same as in
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20090901.094156.1dc47c81.en.html
no such message here
So you should be able to produce the error with that example. The
last time I
Andreas Harder wrote:
Am 17.09.2009 um 16:03 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
with the actual beta the compilation of a simple letter stops with:
Undefined control sequence.
\defineblankmethod[\v!nobreak] {\penalty\plustenthousand}
(in default.nli, line 707
\usemodule[letter]
Olaf Mersmann wrote:
Hi list,
the following example works in MkII but not in MkIV as expected:
\defineenumeration[test][%
way=bysection,
location=left,
text=Test]
for the moment use:
\defineenumeration[test]
\setupenumeration[test][%
way=bysection,
location=left,
text=Test]
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:39 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:37 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use a set of of fonts in a per-job-base folder, ie
job_folder_0001
|___myfonts
some job files here...
job_folder_0002
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:49:15PM +0200, luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:39 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:37 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would like to use a set of of fonts in a per-job-base folder, ie
Maybe the right question is
Can I add a path to system font path at runtime ?
OSFONTDIR=$OSFONTDIR;/path/to/myfonts context foo.tex ?
hm maybe
$ export OSFONTDIR=$OSFONTDIR;/path/to/myfonts context foo.tex
thank you , I will try .
Any idea about macro, ie something like \addthistofontpath ..?
Hello Hans,
Excerpts from Hans Hagen's message of Thu Sep 17 17:05:18 +0200 2009:
the following example works in MkII but not in MkIV as expected:
\defineenumeration[test][%
way=bysection,
location=left,
text=Test]
for the moment use:
\defineenumeration[test]
19 matches
Mail list logo
