Hi Hans and Taco,
It seems that with the latest mkiv (version 2011.05.11 10:18, and LuaTeX
version beta-0.70.0-2011050613 (rev 4250) ), there is a slight error for the
spacing of the bounds in the integrals when using inline maths, at least for
some fonts.
For your information the example is
On 11-5-2011 8:39, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Dear ConTeXt-ers, in particular HT,
I have just noticed that 64-bit MikTeX is now using LuaTeX 0.70 and
that the 32-bit version will follow at the end of May.
It would be nice to prepare some version of ConTeXt compatible with
LuaTeX 0.70 that MikTeX
Hi Wolfgang,
The option 'bots' is described in the Columns manual (page 18). Yes I was
looking in the source, but was unable to understand what I found. I saw, that
there are commented lines in page-ini.mkiv (lines 230 and ff).
In columnsets bottom has no effect.
Indeed lrbt does place the
On 05/11/2011 12:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11-5-2011 12:20, Verhaag, G.C.H.M. wrote:
Hi,
A few years ago I created a screen document met menus and coupled
registers, and it just worked fine.
A fresh compilation of this document throws several 'undefined control
sequence' errors; so I wonder
I just found out that I cannot (with MkIV on Windows XP, ConTeXt ver.
2011.02.09 16:42) compile the following
\starttext
This formula produces an error:
\startformula
[r_{\rm test}]=a
\stopformula
\stoptext
\starttext
However, this works:
\startformula
a=[r_{\rm test}]
\stopformula
What's going
just realized: is it perhaps that in the first case, the square brackets are
interpreted as a list of parameters to \startformula?
2011/5/12 Julian Becker becker.jul...@gmail.com
I just found out that I cannot (with MkIV on Windows XP, ConTeXt ver.
2011.02.09 16:42) compile the following
On 12-5-2011 2:05, Julian Becker wrote:
just realized: is it perhaps that in the first case, the square brackets are
interpreted as a list of parameters to \startformula?
indeed, so add \relax after \startformula
-
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 12-5-2011 2:05, Julian Becker wrote:
just realized: is it perhaps that in the first case, the square brackets
are
interpreted as a list of parameters to \startformula?
indeed, so add \relax after \startformula
or use
\left[
thank you Hans and Luigi for the clarification
2011/5/12 luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 12-5-2011 2:05, Julian Becker wrote:
just realized: is it perhaps that in the first case, the square brackets
are
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans and Taco,
It seems that with the latest mkiv (version 2011.05.11 10:18, and LuaTeX
version beta-0.70.0-2011050613 (rev 4250) ), there is a slight error for the
spacing of the bounds in the integrals when using inline maths, at least for
some
Hi,
The minimals now carry a beta version of lmmath.otf. Even when all lm
and gyre math fonts are released, the vf variants will stay available if
only because we need them to test luatex's virtual font machinery.
As there is only one design size (but with a proper ssty feature), I
decided
On 12-5-2011 3:26, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Since the wrong spacing is with the virtual fonts, this could be related
to the recent change in the italic correction.
indeed, but Taco needs to explain why this affects inline math
Hans
2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
\starttext
$e=mc^2$
Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²?
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
\starttext
$e=mc^2$
Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²?
No. IIRC, we had a discussion sometime ago whether we should treat ¹,², etc as
valid superscripts in math mode, and decided against it.
On 12-5-2011 3:37, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/5/12 Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl:
\starttext
$e=mc^2$
Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²?
Maybe at some point I will provide that as an option, but ² is one of
those weird unicode things ... what woudl you do in this case:
a = bc^{2d}
On 12-5-2011 3:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
\starttext
$e=mc^2$
Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²?
No. IIRC, we had a discussion sometime ago whether we should treat ¹,²,
etc as
valid superscripts in math
Am 12.05.2011 um 10:11 schrieb Willi Egger:
In columnsets bottom has no effect.
When I use “bottom” in our example context reserves space for the figure at the
bottom but the figure itself doesn’t appear.
Indeed lrbt does place the figure at the bottom. The struggle is, that I have
to be
Hello,
I cannot find how to set the width of a table column. I am running
MkII. The manual gives this: w set minimum column width at specified
value
I have currently: \starttable[|l|l|w5cm l|p|]
but that italicises the content of column 3. I have tried variations to
no avail.
Thanks for any
Am 12.05.2011 um 19:34 schrieb Roger Mason:
Hello,
I cannot find how to set the width of a table column. I am running
MkII. The manual gives this: w set minimum column width at specified
value
I have currently: \starttable[|l|l|w5cm l|p|]
You need parentheses!
… | l w(5cm) | …
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com writes:
You need parentheses!
… | l w(5cm) | …
Many thanks.
If I may presume on your patience a little more...
I now have: \starttable[| l s1 | s1 l | s0 lp w(10cm) | s0 l |]
However, the entries in column 3 have line-feeds
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 12-5-2011 3:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
\starttext
$e=mc^2$
Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²?
No. IIRC, we had a discussion
Am 12.05.2011 um 20:10 schrieb Roger Mason:
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com writes:
You need parentheses!
… | l w(5cm) | …
Many thanks.
If I may presume on your patience a little more...
I now have: \starttable[| l s1 | s1 l | s0 lp w(10cm) |
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com writes:
Don’t mix “p” and “w” keywords, “w” sets the width for a cell where
you don’t want a line break in the cell while “p” is for paragraphs
where you can set the width of the cell with “p(10cm)”.
Many thanks Wolfgang. I've been using
Am 12.05.2011 um 20:41 schrieb Roger Mason:
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com writes:
Don’t mix “p” and “w” keywords, “w” sets the width for a cell where
you don’t want a line break in the cell while “p” is for paragraphs
where you can set the width of the cell with
Dear all,
I'd like to show the following formula line by line in a presentation,
For example,
\startformula\startalign
\NC T(4) \NC = T(3) + 4 \NR
\NC \NC= T(2) + 3 + 4 \NR
\NC \NC= T(1) + 2 + 3 + 4 \NR
\NC \NC= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10 \NR
\stopalign\stopformula
I tried to use \StartSteps and
Am 13.05.2011 um 02:13 schrieb Jeong Dalyoung:
Dear all,
I'd like to show the following formula line by line in a presentation,
For example,
\startformula\startalign
\NC T(4) \NC = T(3) + 4 \NR
\NC \NC= T(2) + 3 + 4 \NR
\NC \NC= T(1) + 2 + 3 + 4 \NR
\NC \NC= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10 \NR
26 matches
Mail list logo
