On 12/4/2012 10:01 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 4 déc. 2012, at 17:38, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
concerning the bug reports …
Hi Hans,
Thank you for the fixes and adding the commands \notin and \imply: I did some
testing with your examples and others of my own, and it seems that some
Hi all,
I'm working with some code that was developed by someone else.
The document I'm typesetting is now giving the following error:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
\otr:1:27
\OTRSETdoifcellelse ...er #1:\number #2\endcsname
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working with some code that was developed by someone else.
The document I'm typesetting is now giving the following error:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
\otr:1:27
\OTRSETdoifcellelse ...er
\startsetups math:morespacing
\ordordspacing\textstyle 1mu plus .5mu minus .25mu\relax
\stopsetups
\setupmathematics
[setups=math:morespacing]
$y=m x+c$
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA
/Hans Hagen wrote (///Wed Dec 5 14:10:12 CET 2012/):/
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
/ Hi all,
/
/...
/
/
//
// % Abbreviations
// \definestartstop
//[abblist]
//
Dear Otared,
I tested your sample and it works well.
\notin also works with \enablemode[lmmath] too.
I also agree with your comment on the size of the integrals.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of
Am 05.12.2012 um 16:46 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org:
/Hans Hagen wrote (///Wed Dec 5 14:10:12 CET 2012/):/
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
/ Hi all,
/
/...
/
/
//
// % Abbreviations
Hi Hans,
This is great news!
Thanks for the feature,a nd even more thanks for having made it public…
Is there also a way to control the way some signs are more or less close
together? For instance in the following example a global way to have a result
similar to
On 12/5/2012 8:46 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
This is great news!
Thanks for the feature,a nd even more thanks for having made it public…
Is there also a way to control the way some signs are more or less close
together? For instance in the following example a global way to have a result
Hi all,
I can easily \setupitemgroup to achieve the following:
1. ...
a. ...
1. ...
b. ...
1. ...
2. ...
2. ...
a. ...
1. ...
…but I need the numbers/letters to cumulate as follows:
1. ...
1a. ...
1a1. ...
1b. ...
1b1. ...
Am 06.12.2012 um 06:55 schrieb Malte Stien ma...@stien.de:
Hi all,
I can easily \setupitemgroup to achieve the following:
1. ...
a. ...
1. ...
b. ...
1. ...
2. ...
2. ...
a. ...
1. ...
…but I need the numbers/letters to cumulate as follows:
11 matches
Mail list logo