Re: [NTG-context] Accessibility and Tagged PDFs: Bugs and Feature Requests

2015-07-04 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:19:58 +0200 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: (i'm pretty sure that context was one of the first to support for instance field (widget) trees but support for that in viewers changes each version so one never knows what is the right way as specs predate support in

Re: [NTG-context] conTeXt Mkiv: the number of parameters can not be more than 9?

2015-07-04 Thread 土卜皿
hi,ℤh핚chu ℂh핖n Thanks! I will check it later! Best Regards Dillon 2015-07-05 11:40 GMT+08:00 Zhichu Chen chenzhi...@sinap.ac.cn: Hi Dillon, First of all, I'm against defining such a complex macro, since that can be very confusing when you use it. I personal prefer the key-value

Re: [NTG-context] conTeXt Mkiv: the number of parameters can not be more than 9?

2015-07-04 Thread Jaroslav Hajtmar
Hi Dillon There is also a purely plaintex solutions for example: % Here is Peter Olsak solution (see TBN: ftp://math.feld.cvut.cz/olsak/tbn/tbn.pdf - czech only) \def\terminator{*} \def\usethereadvalues{} \newcount\tempnum \def\readparameters{\tempnum=0\let\next=\readonlyone \next}

Re: [NTG-context] How to implement a head like this?

2015-07-04 Thread 土卜皿
hi, Han and Pablo Thank you very much! I finally asked the question and got the answer, http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/253575/81323, I hope you two help me check it, whether my solution is right direction? And I copied all my resolution here: I found context refer manual 11.3 Variations

[NTG-context] conTeXt Mkiv: the number of parameters can not be more than 9?

2015-07-04 Thread 土卜皿
hi, all For testing, I have a definition: \define[9]\DEFINETEST{#1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9} context test can work fine, when I modify the above into: \define[10]\DEFINETEST{#1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10} I got a error: test.tex: ! Illegal parameter number in definition of \DEFINETEST From

Re: [NTG-context] conTeXt Mkiv: the number of parameters can not be more than 9?

2015-07-04 Thread Zhichu Chen
Hi Dillon, First of all, I'm against defining such a complex macro, since that can be very confusing when you use it. I personal prefer the key-value definition: \def\DEFINETEST[#1]{% \getXXXparameters [paraA=defaultValueForParameterA% ,paraB=% or just empty ,#1]%

Re: [NTG-context] How to implement a head like this?

2015-07-04 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 07/04/2015 01:45 AM, 土卜皿 wrote: After reading something, I think the red area belonging to top area, but there is no definetop or like this, my understanding is right? Hi Dillon, do you text the text heading or also the red line from your attached image? Pablo 2015-07-03 22:32

Re: [NTG-context] How to implement a head like this?

2015-07-04 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7/4/2015 1:45 AM, 土卜皿 wrote: After reading something, I think the red area belonging to top area, but there is no definetop or like this, my understanding is right? you can find examples of adding such shapes in the metafun manual it boils down to putting the text in a \framed and giving

[NTG-context] issues with xtable

2015-07-04 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have the following sample: \setupxtable[frame=on, option=stretch] \setupxtable[name][foregroundstyle=\bfc, ny=3, align=lohi] \setupxtable[cv][foregroundstyle=\em, ny=2, align=bottom] \setupxtable[contact][foregroundstyle=\em, align=flushright] \starttext \startxtable \startxrow