Dear list,
the example below has shifted axes. I updated to the latest standalone
earlier today. The problem was not present some weeks ago.
In particular look at the red line that should start from the origin...
\starttext
\startMPpage
ut:=1.0cm;
ux:=0.6cm;
vardef diffp(expr riktn) =
Dear Otared (and others),
while waiting for Hans reply on the \namedenumerationparameter and
\enumerationparameter, this is the best I could do. Now, only
"Question" is clickable and not the number, but I think I could live
with that if no other solution show up.
Best regards, Mikael
On 03/11/2016 12:28, Hans Hagen wrote:
if you need a command list .. there are scripts for that (no vim yet,
but for scite we ship simple lists of commands)
Are these scripts available somewhere?
what kind of datafile do you need?
I need the list of all macros, vardefs, internals, and
Dear Hans,
This seems to be exactly what I need, but I cannot get it to work.
With the example below nothing comes from those
commands (I just updated my standalone to the latest one). On the
other hand, with text instead of reference it works.
Best regards, Mikael
\defineenumeration[question][
On 11/3/2016 11:25 AM, Nicola wrote:
On 03/11/2016 10:45, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/2/2016 11:35 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016, Nicola wrote:
The syntax scripts in Vim already cover all of MetaFun. MetaFun
keywords are highlighted by default inside ConTeXt documents; for
On 03/11/2016 10:45, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/2/2016 11:35 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016, Nicola wrote:
The syntax scripts in Vim already cover all of MetaFun. MetaFun
keywords are highlighted by default inside ConTeXt documents; for
MetaPost files ('mp' filetype), you must put
On 11/2/2016 11:35 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016, Nicola wrote:
The syntax scripts in Vim already cover all of MetaFun. MetaFun
keywords are highlighted by default inside ConTeXt documents; for
MetaPost files ('mp' filetype), you must put
let g:mp_metafun_macros = 1
into
On 11/2/2016 9:58 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Dear Otared,
thank you again. This is somehow a proof that it should work. In my
real document I use the title to name some exercises (after old
exams), and I don't see how that can be combined with your solution.
If someone else reads this: I
