Re: [NTG-context] TOC in presentations

2017-03-08 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 03/09/2017 06:57 AM, Jose Luis Arellano wrote: Dear list, After learning ConTeXt for a while, I have decided to try to make my own slides, but I will like to use a list of contents in every page. Can anybody post an example or link to start? Have a look at the code in s-present-original.m

[NTG-context] TOC in presentations

2017-03-08 Thread Jose Luis Arellano
Dear list, After learning ConTeXt for a while, I have decided to try to make my own slides, but I will like to use a list of contents in every page. Can anybody post an example or link to start? Thanks in advance ___

[NTG-context] display current section number in \writestatus

2017-03-08 Thread Rik Kabel
ConTeXters, What is the best way to get the current section number in a basic format (pt.ch.s.ss... as displayed in the log in structure sectioning entries) for display in a custom log entry (via \writestatus)? I have tried \fullheadnumber and such, but cannot find something appropriate. --

Re: [NTG-context] (off-topic) concatenating signed PDF documents

2017-03-08 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 03/08/2017 07:35 PM, Henri Menke wrote: > »If you have PDF documents digitally signed the only way to combine > them preserving their signatures is to create a PDF Portfolio with > Acrobat Pro.« Many thanks for your reply, Henri. I saw that a way is attaching the PDF files to another PDF docum

Re: [NTG-context] (off-topic) concatenating signed PDF documents

2017-03-08 Thread Henri Menke
»If you have PDF documents digitally signed the only way to combine them preserving their signatures is to create a PDF Portfolio with Acrobat Pro.« Source: https://answers.acrobatusers.com/How-do-I-combine-multiple-files-to-one-PDF-when-one-or-more-files-has-been-digitally-signed-through-Docusig

[NTG-context] (off-topic) concatenating signed PDF documents

2017-03-08 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have a question for users with more knowledge on digitally-signed PDF documents. Is it possible to concatenate PDF documents (each signed by a different certificate [by a different person]) into a single PDF document without invalidating any signature? I tried to join all PDF files

Re: [NTG-context] Feature Request: xtables extensions

2017-03-08 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Alan Braslau wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:29:52 +0100 Henri Menke wrote: Natural Tables are quite handy but their syntax is a little verbose. \bTABLE \bTR \bTD ... \eTD \eTR \eTABLE There exist nice extensions which make the format less verbose by mapping \start

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in Natural Tables

2017-03-08 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 03/08/2017 03:47 PM, Henri Menke wrote: No, this is Natural Tables. The macros I am using are defined in tabl-nte.mkiv and the header there states You're right, I was too fast with my response. Nevertheless, as you requested, here the same bug with the traditional Natural Table macros:

Re: [NTG-context] Feature Request: xtables extensions

2017-03-08 Thread Alan Braslau
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:29:52 +0100 Henri Menke wrote: > Natural Tables are quite handy but their syntax is a little verbose. > > \bTABLE > \bTR > \bTD ... \eTD > \eTR > \eTABLE > > There exist nice extensions which make the format less verbose by > mapping > > \startTABLE > \NC ... \N

Re: [NTG-context] Feature Request: xtables extensions

2017-03-08 Thread Henri Menke
I refined the proposal a little further to not having to overload xtables but only use one remaining internal macro of xtables. I also sent this version to Hans to be considered going to the ConTeXt core. \unprotect %D xtable extensions \definextable[XTABLE] \unexpanded\def\startXTABLE {\b

Re: [NTG-context] Feature Request: xtables extensions

2017-03-08 Thread Henri Menke
Alternatively to my first proposal but still overloading the original xtables I came up with another solution which does not have the \NC\NR but only \NR and does not read the cell content as an argument. \unprotect % Overload tabl_x_start_table \unexpanded\def\tabl_x_start_table[#settings]% ma

Re: [NTG-context] Feature Request: xtables extensions

2017-03-08 Thread Henri Menke
I quickly came up with something myself. Unfortunately, it involves overloading of the original xtables. Perhaps there is a better way but it works. I am happy to hear your opinions! \unprotect % Overload tabl_x_start_table \unexpanded\def\tabl_x_start_table[#settings]% maybe two arguments:

[NTG-context] Feature Request: xtables extensions

2017-03-08 Thread Henri Menke
Dear devs, Natural Tables are quite handy but their syntax is a little verbose. \bTABLE \bTR \bTD ... \eTD \eTR \eTABLE There exist nice extensions which make the format less verbose by mapping \startTABLE \NC ... \NR\NR \stopTABLE back to the original macros. The new method for tab

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in Natural Tables

2017-03-08 Thread Henri Menke
On 03/08/2017 10:52 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > On 03/08/2017 10:28 AM, Henri Menke wrote: >> \starttext >> >> \startTABLE[align={lohi,middle}] >> \NC OSI-Schicht\NC[nx=6] Umsetzung \NC\NR >> \NC Anwendungsschicht \NC[nx=2,ny=3] SOME/I \NC[nx=2,ny=3] AVB/TSN >> \NC[nx=2,ny=

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in Natural Tables

2017-03-08 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 03/08/2017 10:28 AM, Henri Menke wrote: \starttext \startTABLE[align={lohi,middle}] \NC OSI-Schicht\NC[nx=6] Umsetzung \NC\NR \NC Anwendungsschicht \NC[nx=2,ny=3] SOME/I \NC[nx=2,ny=3] AVB/TSN \NC[nx=2,ny=3] DoIP \NC\NR \NC Darstellungsschicht\NC\NR \NC Sitzungss

[NTG-context] Bug in Natural Tables

2017-03-08 Thread Henri Menke
Dear list, I wanted to show off the wonders of Natural Tables in TeX.SX but the table I wanted to make escapes out of the page. Why does the width explode so much? MWE is below. Cheers, Henri --- \starttext \startTABLE[align={lohi,middle}] \NC OSI-Schicht\NC[nx=6] Umsetzung \