Re: [NTG-context] \unit parser ignoring case, in some cases.

2023-03-13 Thread Alan Braslau via ntg-context
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:55:50 -0600 Gavin via ntg-context wrote: > > you can look at phys-dim and see plenty of short and long keys and > > making all case insensitive is asking for troubles > > Indeed, I would like to make NONE of them case insensitive. But > currently, when I register an

Re: [NTG-context] How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters?

2023-03-13 Thread Alan Braslau via ntg-context
Designating "optional" parameters within [...] is a LaTeX notion. ConTeXt handles parameters differently. Alan > > and I'd like to be able to extend it so that any of the following > > can be used: > > > >\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc} > >\mycommand{aa}{bb}{cc}{dd} > >

Re: [NTG-context] \unit parser ignoring case, in some cases.

2023-03-13 Thread Gavin via ntg-context
> On Mar 13, 2023, at 3:44 PM, Hans Hagen via ntg-context > wrote: > > On 3/9/2023 2:04 PM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote: >> \startformula >> \unit{3 meter} \qquad >> \unit{6 Meter} \qquad >> \unit{3 mEtEr} \qquad >> \stopformula >> Units with lowercase prefixes (c, k, n). >>

Re: [NTG-context] \unit parser ignoring case, in some cases.

2023-03-13 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 3/9/2023 2:04 PM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote: \startformula \unit{3 meter} \qquad \unit{6 Meter} \qquad \unit{3 mEtEr} \qquad \stopformula Units with lowercase prefixes (c, k, n). \startformula \unit{3cm} \qquad \unit{6kg} \qquad \unit{3ns} \qquad \stopformula Units with

Re: [NTG-context] How to extend an existing macro to take optional parameters?

2023-03-13 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 3/12/2023 2:24 PM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote: I have an existing macro that I'd like to extend. The current definition is \define[3]\mycommand{...} which I'd like to extend to take an optional 4th parameter plus an optional setup parameter. Thus I currently invoke it as:

Re: [NTG-context] extra lines in PDF annotations

2023-03-13 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 3/13/2023 4:22 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote: On 3/13/23 16:06, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote: Dear list, using current latest from 2023.03.10 12:18, I have this XML sample: I apologize, XML source doesn’t have lines inside, such as in: I

Re: [NTG-context] Did dotless i disappear ?

2023-03-13 Thread Otared Kavian via ntg-context
Hi Pablo, Hans, Wolfgang, Indeed, thanks to you I see that in ConTeXt there exist plenty of solutions for the problem I reported. That’s really impressive ! Best regards : Otared > On 13 Mar 2023, at 20:19, Hans Hagen via ntg-context > wrote: > > On 3/13/2023 4:28 PM, Otared Kavian via

Re: [NTG-context] Did dotless i disappear ?

2023-03-13 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 3/13/2023 4:28 PM, Otared Kavian via ntg-context wrote: Hi Hans, I just noticed that the dotless i « \i » is not anymore recognized in ConTeXt. Of course one can nowadays find other ways to have it typeset, but in old documents which are included as inputs one has to correct this manually

Re: [NTG-context] Did dotless i disappear ?

2023-03-13 Thread Wolfgang Schuster via ntg-context
Otared Kavian via ntg-context schrieb am 13.03.2023 um 16:28: Hi Hans, I just noticed that the dotless i « \i » is not anymore recognized in ConTeXt. Of course one can nowadays find other ways to have it typeset, but in old documents which are included as inputs one has to correct this

Re: [NTG-context] Did dotless i disappear ?

2023-03-13 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
On 3/13/23 16:28, Otared Kavian via ntg-context wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I just noticed that the dotless i « \i » is not anymore recognized in > ConTeXt. Of course one can nowadays find other ways to have it > typeset, but in old documents which are included as inputs one has to > correct this

[NTG-context] Did dotless i disappear ?

2023-03-13 Thread Otared Kavian via ntg-context
Hi Hans, I just noticed that the dotless i « \i » is not anymore recognized in ConTeXt. Of course one can nowadays find other ways to have it typeset, but in old documents which are included as inputs one has to correct this manually (for instance in French « connaître » was typed as «

Re: [NTG-context] extra lines in PDF annotations

2023-03-13 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
On 3/13/23 16:06, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote: > Dear list, > > using current latest from 2023.03.10 12:18, I have this XML sample: > > > > > > I apologize, XML source doesn’t have lines inside, such as in: I hope EOLs are fine now. Pablo

[NTG-context] extra lines in PDF annotations

2023-03-13 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
Dear list, using current latest from 2023.03.10 12:18, I have this XML sample: And the following environment: \setupinteraction[state=start] \startxmlsetups xml:text \xmlsetsetup{\xmldocument} {pre} {xml:copy:html} \stopxmlsetups

Re: [NTG-context] Table

2023-03-13 Thread Ursula Hermann via ntg-context
Dear Mikael! Many thanks, that works great! Uschi Von: ntg-context Im Auftrag von Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context Gesendet: Montag, 13. März 2023 14:16 An: mailing list for ConTeXt users Cc: Mikael Sundqvist Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Table Hi Uschi, On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:03 PM

Re: [NTG-context] Table

2023-03-13 Thread Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
Hi Uschi, On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:03 PM Ursula Hermann via ntg-context < ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote: > I’d like to do a Table lik this one > > [image: enter image description here] > > I have no example. How can I do that? > > > > Many thanks > > Uschi > There are probably better ways, but

[NTG-context] Table

2023-03-13 Thread Ursula Hermann via ntg-context
I'd like to do a Table lik this one [enter image description here] I have no example. How can I do that? Many thanks Uschi ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!