Re: [NTG-context] [BUG] unic-032.tex 0x2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS definition wrong

2005-07-20 Thread Hans Hagen
Nikolai Weibull wrote: \textellipsis usually expands to \cdots and that's fine, but \textellipsis shouldn't be used in unic-032.tex for 0x2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS, as this codepoint is for a symbol of dots on the base-line, not in the center. I've posted about this previously, but got no

Re: [NTG-context] [BUG] unic-032.tex 0x2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS definition wrong

2005-07-20 Thread Nikolai Weibull
Hans Hagen wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: [HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS definition wrong] i made it the equivalent of \unknown (better spacing than \dots) Ah, so very, very true. Thanks, nikolai -- Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/! Born in Chicago, IL USA;

[NTG-context] [BUG] unic-032.tex 0x2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS definition wrong

2005-07-19 Thread Nikolai Weibull
\textellipsis usually expands to \cdots and that's fine, but \textellipsis shouldn't be used in unic-032.tex for 0x2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS, as this codepoint is for a symbol of dots on the base-line, not in the center. I've posted about this previously, but got no response. Anyway, I've