Re: [NTG-context] \dontleavehmode and indenting after section (was Re: Context 2006.08.04 released)

2006-08-08 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
Taco wrote: > > Right in front of my nose (I was looking in the source files for a > > line that needed a % at the end). Is it because tex is still in > > horizontal mode thanks to the \dontleavehmode, and also because spaces > > after } are not ignored automatically? > > The answer is yes (the n

Re: [NTG-context] \dontleavehmode and indenting after section (was Re: Context 2006.08.04 released)

2006-08-08 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: >>The space is created from the linefeed at the end of the line >> \section{First} >>but I do not quite see why it is not ignored. > > > Right in front of my nose (I was looking in the source files for a > line that needed a % at the end). Is it because tex is still in > h

Re: [NTG-context] \dontleavehmode and indenting after section (was Re: Context 2006.08.04 released)

2006-08-08 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
> The space is created from the linefeed at the end of the line > \section{First} > but I do not quite see why it is not ignored. Right in front of my nose (I was looking in the source files for a line that needed a % at the end). Is it because tex is still in horizontal mode thanks to the \don

Re: [NTG-context] \dontleavehmode and indenting after section (was Re: Context 2006.08.04 released)

2006-08-08 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: > I couldn't find the extra space in the source, but here's the minimal > test file in the hope that your eyes and understanding are sharper. The space is created from the linefeed at the end of the line \section{First} but I do not quite see why it is not ignored. Ta

[NTG-context] \dontleavehmode and indenting after section (was Re: Context 2006.08.04 released)

2006-08-08 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
Hans wrote: > > Is that better than using \noindentation (suggested by the other > > Mahajan)? The one problem with it that I found is an extra space in > > indentation for the first paragraph. I guess it's because there's a > > space in horizontal mode somewhere that isn't being ignored (as it >