Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:26:12 +0100 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing.: > Hello, > > yes, that's right; but I thought there is an option to "override" the > default/set-up setting - > > - what should "unpacked" do otherwise? Imho while you can use packed locally unpacked is only for global settings.

Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 12/19/2016 02:26 PM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: Also, in my case, there are more \itemize to be packed; and some of them (in the middle of the document) should be "unpacked"; so grouping itemize setting is not very comfortable here. Then the cleanest (and most ConTeXt-like) solution would

Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing .
Hello, yes, that's right; but I thought there is an option to "override" the default/set-up setting - - what should "unpacked" do otherwise? Also, in my case, there are more \itemize to be packed; and some of them (in the middle of the document) should be "unpacked"; so grouping itemize

Re: [NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 19.12.2016 um 13:26 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing.: Hello, I have code that setups \itemize packed. Is it possible to force "unpacked" option back (mentioned here: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupitemgroup)? \starttext \startitemize[][] \item 1a \item 1b

[NTG-context] \itemize unpacked?

2016-12-19 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing .
Hello, I have code that setups \itemize packed. Is it possible to force "unpacked" option back (mentioned here: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupitemgroup)? \starttext \startitemize[][] \item 1a \item 1b \stopitemize \setupitemize[each][packed,joinedup] % <---