Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I have been looking at different ways to parse TeX syntax since I
occassionally do ConTeXt - LaTeX conversion. Things like gema and regexs
are ok for small things: e.g., convert ConTeXt section commands to LaTeX
section commnads, convert figures, etc. Gema is better
I would not do it like that again, these days I would use lpeg, but
it was not nearly as complicated to do it in tex macros as I had
anticipated.
A bit off-topic:
suppose that I , while I'm making format , I need to trace macro definitions
(\edef,\xdef,\def,\let and eventually alias like
luigi scarso wrote:
I would not do it like that again, these days I would use lpeg, but
it was not nearly as complicated to do it in tex macros as I had
anticipated.
A bit off-topic:
suppose that I , while I'm making format , I need to trace macro definitions
(\edef,\xdef,\def,\let and
A bit off-topic:
suppose that I , while I'm making format , I need to trace macro
definitions
(\edef,\xdef,\def,\let and eventually alias like \let\define\def, so
also \define too,...)
This can be do only hacking web source , or not ?
If you set
\tracingassigns=1
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi Aditya,
now I need to apologize for being so slow to reply: thanks a lot, this
looks really fascinating! I don't know how many things I've read on
the web to understand if regexps can handle nested delimiters or not
(I
Hi Aditya,
now I need to apologize for being so slow to reply: thanks a lot, this
looks really fascinating! I don't know how many things I've read on
the web to understand if regexps can handle nested delimiters or not
(I think the long and short of it was that on some mathematical
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi Aditya,
now I need to apologize for being so slow to reply: thanks a lot, this
looks really fascinating! I don't know how many things I've read on
the web to understand if regexps can handle nested delimiters or not
(I think the long and short of it was
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Actually I use this to highlight footnotes in my texteditor: colorize
entire footnotes for for easier reading.
I am quite happy to have (on MacOSX) a text-editor that gives such
syntax coloring flexibility: it is Satoshi Matsumoto's Jedit X. And
Am 06.02.2008 um 20:20 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Actually I use this to highlight footnotes in my texteditor: colorize
entire footnotes for for easier reading.
I am quite happy to have (on MacOSX) a text-editor that gives such
syntax coloring
On 6 feb 2008, at 21:01, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 06.02.2008 um 20:20 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Actually I use this to highlight footnotes in my texteditor:
colorize
entire footnotes for for easier reading.
I am quite happy to have (on
On 6 févr. 08, at 10:11, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
[…]
If someone knows an editor that does syntax coloring with lua or
gema, I'd be very interested!
Hi Steffen,
Smultron does this on MacOS X:
http://smultron.sourceforge.net/
In fact one can define easily a set of syntax colouring for almost
Hi Thomas,
Sorry for the delay in the reply, I was travelling last week.
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Another option is Gema http://gema.sourceforge.net/new/index.shtml
(also has a lua library
On Jan 24, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Another option is Gema http://gema.sourceforge.net/new/index.shtml
(also has a lua library gelhttp://gema.sourceforge.net/new/
gel.shtml). You can define regions and matching nested braces quite
easily.
Aditya
Hi Aditya,
I remember
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
You could also use a nice scripting language like ... lua!! lua has
support for balanced strings, so no nesting trickery is needed,
see http://www.lua.org/pil/20.2.html
(scroll to the bottom of the page). Or you could try and nag Hans
into giving a nice
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
with lpeg, the code looks a bit harder, but is still short and
relatively shortforward:
Here is a smarter lpeg that takes care of embedded \{ as well:
local P, S, V = lpeg.P, lpeg.S, lpeg.V
local matchtable = {
TEXT,
TEXT = (V(FOOTNOTE) + 1)^0 * -1,
On Mon, Jan 21 2008, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
I would like to use in my documents double braces for the footnote –
for easily matching entire footnotes with RegEx (thus it can't
confuse with the nested braces) ...
text\footnote{{this is {\it one} tiny note\index{note}!}}
... and
On Wed, Jan 23 2008, Peter Münster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21 2008, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
I would like to use in my documents double braces for the footnote –
for easily matching entire footnotes with RegEx (thus it can't
confuse with the nested braces) ...
text\footnote{{this is
On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
I've just seen, that it does not work for nested braces:
\footnote{x{y}z}: ok
\footnote{x{y{z}}}: not ok
The next one (normal regexp, not extended) has support for up to one
level
of nesting:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
I've just seen, that it does not work for nested braces:
\footnote{x{y}z}: ok
\footnote{x{y{z}}}: not ok
The next one (normal regexp, not extended) has support for up to one
level
of nesting:
Hi,
I would like to use in my documents double braces for the footnote –
for easily matching entire footnotes with RegEx (thus it can't
confuse with the nested braces) ...
text\footnote{{this is {\it one} tiny note\index{note}!}}
... and match the entire footnote with search regex for
Hi Steffen,
I don't really know regex, but how does your double brace work with
the following
\footnote{{This $\frac{a}{b^{c+d}}$ is a strange footnote}}
note the double }} in the math formula.
/Micke P
On Jan 21, 2008 3:45 PM, Steffen Wolfrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to
math formula is one of the few things I definitely don't have to take
care for =o)
up to now ...
thanks for the tip!
steffen
Am 21.01.2008 um 16:02 schrieb Mikael Persson:
Hi Steffen,
I don't really know regex, but how does your double brace work with
the following
\footnote{{This
22 matches
Mail list logo
