Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:43:35AM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: texmfstart is usually copy texmfstart.rb to texmfstart in bin and make it executable. The drawback is that if something changes, it needs to be updated in the bin folder as well. Hello Mojca, that's why a stub is useful.

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Jan 15, 2008 12:17 AM, Peter Münster wrote: Hello, What about these 2 new stubs: stubs/unix/texmfstart: #!/bin/sh script=$(dirname $0)/../../ruby/texmfstart.rb exec $script $@ # (or exec ruby $script $@) texmfstart is usually copy texmfstart.rb to texmfstart

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: But texmfstart seems to be an exception, I'll just keep my symbolic link. sounds ok to me ... texmfstart, mtxrun, luatools : copies or symlinks the res: stubs (btw, for mtxrun related scripts, this is quite efficient because mtxrun already loads the file databases and

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:43:17AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: But texmfstart seems to be an exception, I'll just keep my symbolic link. sounds ok to me ... texmfstart, mtxrun, luatools : copies or symlinks the res: stubs What about mtxrun and luatools, they are stubs today. Will that

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:43:17AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: But texmfstart seems to be an exception, I'll just keep my symbolic link. sounds ok to me ... texmfstart, mtxrun, luatools : copies or symlinks the res: stubs What about mtxrun and luatools, they are stubs

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: What about mtxrun and luatools, they are stubs today. Will that change? Peter this is mostly up to distributions From now on I use your stubs in my simplistic texlive-package, that is getting even simpler today: chmod +x

[NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-14 Thread Peter Münster
Hello, What about these 2 new stubs: stubs/unix/texmfstart: #!/bin/sh script=$(dirname $0)/../../ruby/texmfstart.rb exec $script $@ # (or exec ruby $script $@) stubs/unix/texsync: #!/bin/sh texmfstart texsync.rb $@ # (Or is texsync now obsolete and replaced by another script?) Cheers, Peter

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-14 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Jan 15, 2008 12:17 AM, Peter Münster wrote: Hello, What about these 2 new stubs: stubs/unix/texmfstart: #!/bin/sh script=$(dirname $0)/../../ruby/texmfstart.rb exec $script $@ # (or exec ruby $script $@) texmfstart is usually copy texmfstart.rb to texmfstart in bin and make it