Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt, XeTeX, ect was Re: OpenType in Windows

2007-04-05 Thread Andrea Valle
Thanks Sanjoy for the exhaustive infos. I knew the relations among Tex, LaTeX and ConTeXt but couldn't understand at which level XeTeX was positioned. So, I was interested in XeTeX because (if I understood clearly) I can use resident fonts. Is it true? What I have to do in order to do this?

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt, XeTeX, ect was Re: OpenType in Windows

2007-04-05 Thread luigi scarso
On 4/5/07, Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What does this exactly mean (from wikipedia)? > > "XeTeX works well with both LaTeX and ConTeXt." > > XeTeX, PDFTeX, eTeX, and TeX (Knuth's original TeX) are conceptually > at the same level. The ConTeXt documents (and kpathsea) call this >

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt, XeTeX, ect was Re: OpenType in Windows

2007-04-05 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
> What does this exactly mean (from wikipedia)? > "XeTeX works well with both LaTeX and ConTeXt." XeTeX, PDFTeX, eTeX, and TeX (Knuth's original TeX) are conceptually at the same level. The ConTeXt documents (and kpathsea) call this level the engine. They all understand basically the same macro

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt, XeTeX, ect was Re: OpenType in Windows

2007-04-05 Thread George N. White III
On 4/5/07, Andrea Valle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a bit confused. Still can't have a clear frame of -TeX stuff. > > What does this exactly mean (from wikipedia)? > > > XeTeX works well with both LaTeX and ConTeXt. In the beginning there was tex, a program. I know people who create documen

[NTG-context] ConTeXt, XeTeX, ect was Re: OpenType in Windows

2007-04-05 Thread Andrea Valle
Hi, I'm a bit confused. Still can't have a clear frame of -TeX stuff. What does this exactly mean (from wikipedia)? XeTeX works well with both LaTeX and ConTeXt. Many thanks Best -a- On 5 Apr 2007, at 12:18, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On 4/5/07, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: Hello, I heard th