Hello,
I have a question on (absolute) positionning of figures/images.
I try to position my images in that way shown in the layout in this
attachment (hope I can post images this way?).
I try to do it with the following lines:
\useexternalfigure[pic01][pic01]
Hi Claudia,
Claudia Lanzl wrote:
Hello,
I have a question on (absolute) positionning of figures/images.
I try to position my images in that way shown in the layout in this
attachment (hope I can post images this way?).
I try to do it with the following lines:
My 2 cents:
Why not use a table ?
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
luigi scarso wrote:
My 2 cents:
Why not use a table ?
maybe also an option, but how will you set the different widths for
pic01 and pic04 (2,3 and 5) in the same column? i know that you can span
columns, but can you set the width of every column at row level? i must
say, that i haven't tried
Hi Peter,
your simple but great idea works fantastically!
Thank you very much!
Anyhow you can combine pic02 and pic03
{\vbox{\externalfigure[pic02.jpg][scale=1000]
\blank[whatever is needed]
\externalfigure[pic03.jpg][scale=1000]}} {Caption}
and use two [2*1] combinations.
Just a fast
Hi Peter, hi Luigi,
didn´t think of tables and I don´t know much about it,
but maybe a combination of your ideas?
Two tables (the first for picture 1, 2 and 3) and a second one
for picture 4 and 5?
Greetings,
Claudia
Peter Rolf wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
My 2 cents:
Why not use a table ?
Claudia Lanzl wrote:
Hi Peter, hi Luigi,
didn´t think of tables and I don´t know much about it,
but maybe a combination of your ideas?
Two tables (the first for picture 1, 2 and 3) and a second one
for picture 4 and 5?
i don't think that using two tables brings you any advantage
On 1/22/07, Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claudia Lanzl wrote:
Hi Peter, hi Luigi,
didn´t think of tables and I don´t know much about it,
but maybe a combination of your ideas?
Two tables (the first for picture 1, 2 and 3) and a second one
for picture 4 and 5?
i don't think
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, luigi scarso wrote:
On 1/22/07, Peter Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claudia Lanzl wrote:
Hi Peter, hi Luigi,
didn´t think of tables and I don´t know much about it,
but maybe a combination of your ideas?
Two tables (the first for picture 1, 2 and 3) and a second one
