Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: setuptex.csh usage

2011-01-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 31-12-2010 1:48, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Hello, setuptex (sh, bash, ...) has most definitions commented out and to work with the minimals seems to need only to set the PATH. Indeed. the commented code has to do with the fact that in the past (unix) distributions tended to set variables when

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: setuptex.csh usage

2010-12-31 Thread Alan BRASLAU
Hello, setuptex (sh, bash, ...) has most definitions commented out and to work with the minimals seems to need only to set the PATH. I currently use the minimals for ConTeXt, and TeXlive for LaTeX (for article submission, where I cannot use ConTeXt). Having the minimals in my PATH before TeXlive

[NTG-context] Fwd: setuptex.csh usage

2010-12-30 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi Jon, you should post your question to the mailing list. Patrick Von: Jon Crump jjcr...@uw.edu Datum: 30. Dezember 2010 19:40:58 MEZ An: garden...@contextgarden.net Betreff: setuptex.csh usage Hans, et alia, [MacOSX, 10.5.8, intel Core 2 Duo, ConTeXt ver: 2010.12.22 20:18 MKIV

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: setuptex.csh usage

2010-12-30 Thread Patrick Gundlach
you should post your question to the mailing list. Of course I meant questions _not_ related to the domain contextgarden.net. Those that are should go to the address you used (gardeners at contextgarden.net). Patrick

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: setuptex.csh usage

2010-12-30 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Its me again, this mail was about setup.csh from the minimals and was addressed to the correct recipients. So my fault for forwarding this to the main mailing list. Sorry for that. Patrick ___ If your question is