Hi John,
John Culleton wrote:
texexec --make en nl
Should I download Context from Pragma and reinstall from scratch? Or just find
an older version on a cdr somewhere? Other suggestions?
Check if you see these lines during the texexec --make run
(or in the log file, afterwards)
language :
On Thursday 30 December 2004 04:30, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi John,
John Culleton wrote:
texexec --make en nl
Should I download Context from Pragma and reinstall from scratch? Or just
find an older version on a cdr somewhere? Other suggestions?
Check if you see these lines during the
Assuming I understood Hans correctly, then using a new ConTeXt
(starting november) together with TL2004 or the latest tetex-beta,
all should be fine. Alternatively, an older ConTeXt (june) with an
older tetex or texlive should also be fine.
All combinations of new and old are apparently broken.
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Assuming I understood Hans correctly, then using a new ConTeXt
(starting november) together with TL2004 or the latest tetex-beta,
all should be fine. Alternatively, an older ConTeXt (june) with an
older tetex or texlive should also be fine.
All combinations of new and old are
I noted that context seems to be most reluctant to hyphenate. So I ran a test
file through plain tex, pdftex and Context and checked the results. Context
hyphenated less than the other two.
The manual does not say much about hyphenation. I am using a fresh TeXLive
install.
Here is the top
Hi John,
Your format is probably missing the hyphenation patterns for english
(I ran into the same problem last week):
# texexec --make en
language : no patterns en for en (n=1) (lang-en.pat,ukhyph.tex
language : no hyphenations en for en (n=1)
language : no patterns uk
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 09:10, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi John,
Your format is probably missing the hyphenation patterns for english
(I ran into the same problem last week):
# texexec --make en
language : no patterns en for en (n=1) (lang-en.pat,ukhyph.tex
language
