On 1/29/2013 12:20 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:33:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and
\tfrac only set the mathstyle before placing the content with the
\over primitive.
The use of \vcenter seems odd here
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:33:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
> The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and
> \tfrac only set the mathstyle before placing the content with the
> \over primitive.
The use of \vcenter seems odd here as it means the fraction rule will no
l
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Janne,
Personnally I prefer to use the Plain TeX alternative \over (which works fine
in ConTeXt), that is
${a \over b}$
instead of
$\frac{a}{b}$
Compare the following two outputs in the example you want to typeset: I think
the seco
Am 28.01.2013 um 21:48 schrieb Aditya Mahajan :
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>>> I'll look into fractions later this week. All the fraction macros of
>>> ConTeXt were based on \genfrac macro from AMSTeX so, in principle, they
>>> should behave in the same manner.
>>
>> Th
Hi Janne,
Personnally I prefer to use the Plain TeX alternative \over (which works fine
in ConTeXt), that is
${a \over b}$
instead of
$\frac{a}{b}$
Compare the following two outputs in the example you want to typeset: I think
the second is more or less what you want
\starttext
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I'll look into fractions later this week. All the fraction macros of ConTeXt
were based on \genfrac macro from AMSTeX so, in principle, they should behave
in the same manner.
The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and \tfrac
Am 28.01.2013 um 20:41 schrieb Aditya Mahajan :
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roland Thiers wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 28 janv. 13 à 10:11, Janne Junnila a écrit :
>>
>>> Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
>>> not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
>>>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roland Thiers wrote:
Le 28 janv. 13 à 10:11, Janne Junnila a écrit :
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
script-size or scriptscript-size (\xfrac, \xxfrac). The specific
formul
Le 28 janv. 13 à 10:11, Janne Junnila a écrit :
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
script-size or scriptscript-size (\xfrac, \xxfrac). The specific
formula I have is
\startformula
f_{B_t | B_s = S,
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
script-size or scriptscript-size (\xfrac, \xxfrac). The specific
formula I have is
\startformula
f_{B_t | B_s = S, B_u = U}(x) = \frac{e^{-\frac{(u-s)x^2 - 2x(S(u-t)
Le 27 janv. 13 à 12:52, Janne Junnila a écrit :
Hi all,
Another problem I have is related to the positioning of minus signs
in front of fractions. I would expect the minus sign to align with
the horizontal line of the fraction, as it does on LaTeX. Below is
an example formula to illust
On Jan 27, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Sietse Brouwer
wrote:
> This is because \startformula can take one optional argument in square
> brackets, and [x,x] is interpreted as that argument. You can make
> \startformula stop looking for [...] either by telling it to `\relax`,
> or by giving it an empty `[]
Hi Sietse,
Sietse wrote:
> This is because \startformula can take one optional argument in square
> brackets, and [x,x] is interpreted as that argument. You can make
> \startformula stop looking for [...] either by telling it to `\relax`,
> or by giving it an empty `[]` of its own to chew on.
Tha
Hi Janne,
Janne wrote:
> I've run into a couple of problems with math typesetting. (I'm using the
> latest ConTeXt standalone beta.) The following doesn't print [x,x] at all:
>
> \startformula
> [x,x]_t = x
> \stopformula
This is because \startformula can take one optional argument in square
brac
Hi all,
I've run into a couple of problems with math typesetting. (I'm using the
latest ConTeXt standalone beta.) The following doesn't print [x,x] at all:
\startformula
[x,x]_t = x
\stopformula
It can be fixed by using \left[x,x\right]_t, but I find the behaviour weird.
Another problem I have
15 matches
Mail list logo