Re: [NTG-context] Most portable font name

2012-05-18 Thread Philipp Gesang
On 2012-05-18 00:00, Hans Hagen wrote: On 17-5-2012 16:11, Philipp Gesang wrote: So I judged that my preferred choice might not be as good as I think. I got cold feet and am about to remove the slide where I recommend the PS name (I can do that later anyways). Is there -- apart from

Re: [NTG-context] Most portable font name

2012-05-18 Thread Hans Hagen
On 18-5-2012 08:20, Philipp Gesang wrote: On 2012-05-18 00:00, Hans Hagen wrote: On 17-5-2012 16:11, Philipp Gesang wrote: So I judged that my preferred choice might not be as good as I think. I got cold feet and am about to remove the slide where I recommend the PS name (I can do that later

Re: [NTG-context] Most portable font name

2012-05-17 Thread Hans Hagen
On 17-5-2012 16:11, Philipp Gesang wrote: So I judged that my preferred choice might not be as good as I think. I got cold feet and am about to remove the slide where I recommend the PS name (I can do that later anyways). Is there -- apart from personal opinions -- some valid reason to prefer

Re: [NTG-context] Most portable font name

2012-05-17 Thread Bill Meahan
It *appears* things like hyphens and underscores are also ignored in addition to ignoring spaces. Is that correct? When I do : [wwm@Linden]$ mtxrun --script fonts --list --info --all pattern=MyFont* and compare against some existing typescripts I see the filename in the typescript is

Re: [NTG-context] Most portable font name

2012-05-17 Thread Hans Hagen
On 18-5-2012 00:16, Bill Meahan wrote: It *appears* things like hyphens and underscores are also ignored in addition to ignoring spaces. Is that correct? indeed typescript is something like: file:myfontname whereas the system filename is /path/to/font/My_Font-Name.otf indeed Hans