Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 10.03.2005 um 10:59 schrieb Gerben Wierda:
What I do not understand is how these components end up in a directory
hierarchy.
What would be very nice is some sort of downloadable archive with some
sample basic project structures.
Reading the stuff above I still have no
On 11 Mar 2005, at 21:58, Matthias Weber wrote:
Relative paths work fine for me as long as they point to
subdirectories.
However, I could never get something like ../figures to work on Mac
Os X,
but that might be my ignorance.
I just got ../images to work but thenmy product file is in a
subdir
Relative paths work fine for me as long as they point to subdirectories.
However, I could never get something like ../figures to work on Mac Os
X,
but that might be my ignorance.
Matthias
but I might be wrong
On Mar 11, 2005, at 3:49 PM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
On 11 Mar 2005, at 18:02, Henning Hr
On 11 Mar 2005, at 18:02, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 10.03.2005 um 10:59 schrieb Gerben Wierda:
What I do not understand is how these components end up in a directory
hierarchy.
What would be very nice is some sort of downloadable archive with some
sample basic project structures.
Reading the st
Am 10.03.2005 um 10:59 schrieb Gerben Wierda:
What I do not understand is how these components end up in a directory
hierarchy.
What would be very nice is some sort of downloadable archive with some
sample basic project structures.
Reading the stuff above I still have no idea how to build a directo
> Gerben Wierda wrote:
>> I am (again) considering moving to ConTeXt. A few years ago I
>> investigated
>> the move because I have apositive impression of the quality of the
>> ConTeXt
>> project and because I find the standard LaTeX layouts ugly. At that time
>> I
>> decided against it because the
Hans Hagen said this at Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:46:54 +0100:
>> - lettrine.sty (I have my own TeX code now, but lettrine is probably
better)
>
>your own code should not be a problem as long as you don;t overload low
level
>commands
Most of the lettrine basics are exposed in the DroppedCaps macros in
Gerben Wierda wrote:
I am (again) considering moving to ConTeXt. A few years ago I investigated
the move because I have apositive impression of the quality of the ConTeXt
project and because I find the standard LaTeX layouts ugly. At that time I
decided against it because the first thing I tried (a
I am (again) considering moving to ConTeXt. A few years ago I investigated
the move because I have apositive impression of the quality of the ConTeXt
project and because I find the standard LaTeX layouts ugly. At that time I
decided against it because the first thing I tried (a list within a list)