Re: Re[2]: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

On Feb 18, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: \textbraceleft and \textbraceright should work ok if encodings are set up correctly. Your're right, it works as expected. Thanks a lot! All best Thomas ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

At 09:17 17/02/2004, Thomas A.Schmitz wrote: Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset { and }. Suggestions were \type|{| and \type|}| or $\{$ and $\}$. Neither of which is satisfactory, because

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Tuesday, February 17, 2004 Thomas A.Schmitz wrote: Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset { and }. Suggestions were \type|{| and \type|}| or $\{$ and $\}$. Neither of which is satisfactory,

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

At 07:24 18/02/2004, you wrote: A couple of fonts, including Computer Modern Roman, do not have curly braces as glyphs. As Computer Modern Roman is the brick-and-mortar font of TeX, few people bother that there is no explicit token/command that evokes it. mayhe changing to LatinModern will help,

RE: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Hello Tobias and Alexander, both works. Thank you. I didnt know that I can use '|' instead of '{'}. But one thing does not work: {\bf $\{$} does not print the '{' bold faced :-( Is there a workaround for this problem? Greetings Dierk Höppner -Original Message- From: Tobias Burnus

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset { and }. Suggestions were \type|{| and \type|}| or $\{$ and $\}$. Neither of which is satisfactory, because it will typeset them either in typewriter or

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

A couple of fonts, including Computer Modern Roman, do not have curly braces as glyphs. As Computer Modern Roman is the brick-and-mortar font of TeX, few people bother that there is no explicit token/command that evokes it. You have a point though. -- Johannes Hüsing There is something

RE: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

I would second that. I can use it in computer program documentation for many different things. Greetings Dierk -Original Message- From: Thomas A.Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing

[NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Hello, just a short and simple question with hopefully a quick answer: How do I print '{' and '}'. You may answer with RTFM but please name the M and page! Thanks and sorry for the simple question. greetings Dierk Höppner Technische Informationsbibliothek Universitätsbibliothek Hannover

Re: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

Hello, On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:29:48PM +0100, Alexander Klink wrote: How do I print '{' and '}'. You may answer with RTFM but please name the M and page! what about \type|{| and \type|}| (just like \verb in LaTeX)? Or $\{$ and $\}$ which uses the math font instead of the typewriter front.