2007/12/18, Zhichu Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Wolfgang,
I looked at the source a little bit but all macros are defined with
insertion and I don't know how to make them share a same counter. Maybe we
need a new \definerelatednote macro.
Anyway, your suggestion makes sense.
You could try
On Dec 19, 2007 7:54 PM, Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2007/12/18, Zhichu Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Wolfgang,
I looked at the source a little bit but all macros are defined with
insertion and I don't know how to make them share a same counter. Maybe
we
need a new
You try to start with these moduls and adapt it to the note machanism.
Yes, I would love to do that. But I have some politics things to read. I
have to remember them in one month. So please forgive my laziness. After
then, I will have time to test luatex on Chinese and some other interesting
On Dec 19, 2007 10:06 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You try to start with these moduls and adapt it to the note machanism.
Yes, I would love to do that. But I have some politics things to read. I
have to remember them in one month. So please forgive my laziness. After
2007/12/17, Zhichu Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everybody,
Right now I'm writing an article and in the title's block I wanna thank
somebody and in the authors' block I wanna display the email addresses. And
I want them done with footnotes with set 2 conversion. When I use
Thanks Wolfgang,
I looked at the source a little bit but all macros are defined with
insertion and I don't know how to make them share a same counter. Maybe we
need a new \definerelatednote macro.
Anyway, your suggestion makes sense.
On Dec 18, 2007 5:59 PM, Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everybody,
Right now I'm writing an article and in the title's block I wanna thank
somebody and in the authors' block I wanna display the email addresses. And
I want them done with footnotes with set 2 conversion. When I use
===
