Hi,
Would it break anything to remove the LaTeX check?
no, apart from being less polite to ths confused user ; btw, why does
it need to be removed?
Well, it does not really have to be removed. The only thing that I
think is unnecessary is that ConTeXt defines \documentclass. IMO it
is not a
Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this is because in core-mis.tex, ConTeXt defines \documentclass. I
wonder why.
Actually, I still wonder why. Could anyone enlighten me?
Patrick
--
Silent is the goldfish in its bowl
___
ntg-context
At 12:07 19/09/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this is because in core-mis.tex, ConTeXt defines \documentclass. I
wonder why.
Actually, I still wonder why. Could anyone enlighten me?
as a trigger point for a message
Hans
Hi,
this is because in core-mis.tex, ConTeXt defines \documentclass. I
wonder why.
Actually, I still wonder why. Could anyone enlighten me?
as a trigger point for a message
You mean the
system : try LaTeX
message?
Would it break anything to remove the LaTeX check?
Patrick
--
Steffen Wolfrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
But how?
\input soul.sty
gives me in ConTeXt:
(/Users/steffen/Library/texmf/tex/latex/misc/soul.sty
! Undefined control sequence.
l.49 \NeedsTeXFormat
{LaTeX2e}
?
this is because in core-mis.tex, ConTeXt
