Patrick Gundlach wrote:
actually it does not touch the path when the path is ok (i.e. has
engine support built in)
... depending on a suitable definition of 'ok'. But what I wanted to
say is that I have the feeling that I am losing more and more control
of the settings.
hm, you can just s
> actually it does not touch the path when the path is ok (i.e. has
> engine support built in)
... depending on a suitable definition of 'ok'. But what I wanted to
say is that I have the feeling that I am losing more and more control
of the settings.
Patrick
--
ConTeXt wiki and more: http://c
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
[...]
by setting it, you *know* what happens, texformats is rather
distribution dependent, can hold many paths, changes now and then, so
...
Actually, as Taco has pointed out, it is set (to .;$TEXMF/web2c). But
that does not give me the guarantee that I *know* what h
[...]
> by setting it, you *know* what happens, texformats is rather
> distribution dependent, can hold many paths, changes now and then, so
> ...
Actually, as Taco has pointed out, it is set (to .;$TEXMF/web2c). But
that does not give me the guarantee that I *know* what happens. See
the current
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hi all,
Barring typo's, this wiki page should be a help for people trying
to upgrade a 'normal' teTeX:
http://contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation
Very nice page, Taco. One remark though: TEXFORMATS doesn't have to be
set. - Or do you have "better" experience
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hi all,
Barring typo's, this wiki page should be a help for people trying
to upgrade a 'normal' teTeX:
http://contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation
Very nice page, Taco. One remark though: TEXFORMATS doesn't have to be
set. - Or do you have "better" experience
Hi all,
> Barring typo's, this wiki page should be a help for people trying
> to upgrade a 'normal' teTeX:
>
>http://contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation
Very nice page, Taco. One remark though: TEXFORMATS doesn't have to be
set. - Or do you have "better" experience with it?
Patrick
--
