Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Don't call me magic. I am currently trying to understand the tftopl,
pltotf, vftovp and vptovf programs in detail. And I am so miserable at
that; all kinds of optimizations that makes the code unreadable.
I've spent the better part of the last week trying to come to
It is perhaps a lot of work included, but extending the
contextgarden.net in such a way that users could provide test cases
which would be typeset with different ConTeXt versions and PNGs
compared afterwards ... could make it easier to discover any broken
functionality.
It comes down to:
*
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
It is perhaps a lot of work included, but extending the
contextgarden.net in such a way that users could provide test cases
which would be typeset with different ConTeXt versions and PNGs
compared afterwards ... could make it easier to discover any broken
[...]
No, this wouldn't make any sense. I was thinking about PDF to PNG
conversion and bitwise comparison of the files, which could be made
automatically. Each time a new version would be uploaded, the
documents would be compiled, any compilation errors caught and any
image differences
