Monday, December 8, 2003 David Munger wrote:
\placeformula
\startgather
f(x) = x \\
g(x) = x^2 \\
h(x) = x^3
\stopgather
I will look into this. Are you using amsl only or nath too?
It works well with amsl only. Though it would be nice to have an option to
chose between
\placeformula
\startgather
f(x) = x \\
g(x) = x^2 \\
h(x) = x^3
\stopgather
I will look into this. Are you using amsl only or nath too?
It works well with amsl only. Though it would be nice to have an option to
chose between individual numbering or one number for all equations.
The
Monday, December 8, 2003 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Regarding your problem(s):
* with the ConTeXt version I have (2003.09.26), all lines in
the gather are separate. The whole block has a single number,
though. This is both with, and without nath.
* formula (sub)numbering needs a good cleanup
What version of ConTeXt are you using?
texexec says:
ConTeXt ver: 2003.1.31 fmt: 2003.10.4 int: english mes: english
I'm using the version included in debian unstable's tetex package.
* formula (sub)numbering needs a good cleanup in ConTeXt (just
like math support in general ...). I need to
Monday, December 8, 2003 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Regarding your problem(s):
* with the ConTeXt version I have (2003.09.26), all lines in
the gather are separate. The whole block has a single number,
though. This is both with, and without nath.
* formula (sub)numbering needs a good cleanup
Monday, December 8, 2003 David Munger wrote:
What version of ConTeXt are you using?
texexec says:
ConTeXt ver: 2003.1.31 fmt: 2003.10.4 int: english mes: english
I'm using the version included in debian unstable's tetex package.
That's pretty old. May I suggest an upgrade? (It wouldn't
