Eckhart Guthöhrlein wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 01:37:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
But anyway, transparency is ignored when using shading. Is there any
possibility to achieve a gradient from, i.e., completely transparent to
completely intransparent white?
no(t yet), i dunno if pdf sup
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 01:37:06PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >But anyway, transparency is ignored when using shading. Is there any
> >possibility to achieve a gradient from, i.e., completely transparent to
> >completely intransparent white?
> >
> >
> no(t yet), i dunno if pdf supports that -)
T
Eckhart Guthöhrlein wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Vit Zyka wrote:
Furthermore, the shading variants for linear_shade do not correspond
with those listed in the metafun manual, page 180. Variant 2 is missing
and behaves like variant 3 should.
Not so exactly. The today re
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Vit Zyka wrote:
> >Furthermore, the shading variants for linear_shade do not correspond
> >with those listed in the metafun manual, page 180. Variant 2 is missing
> >and behaves like variant 3 should.
>
> Not so exactly. The today reality is a bit richer t
Furthermore, the shading variants for linear_shade do not correspond
with those listed in the metafun manual, page 180. Variant 2 is missing
and behaves like variant 3 should.
Not so exactly. The today reality is a bit richer than that in the
Metafun manual. One can choose from 8 directions:
numb
Hi all,
experimenting with transparencies, I have obviously come to a
limitation: color shading does not work for transparent colors. What I
have in mind is a bar filled with a color gradient, starting from a
certain (non-transparent) color and ending transparent, i.e. vanishing
into the backgroun
