Re: [NTG-context] Stacking math symbols

2016-02-23 Thread Nicola
On 2016-02-23 21:11:11 +, Hans Hagen said: On 2/23/2016 7:31 PM, Nicola wrote: I find it a bit surprising that ConTeXt gives 'missing } inserted' with: \starttext\startformula \mathop=^{\rm def} \stopformula\stoptext (\mathop{=}^... is fine, though). The above formula is correct in

Re: [NTG-context] Stacking math symbols

2016-02-23 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/23/2016 7:31 PM, Nicola wrote: I find it a bit surprising that ConTeXt gives 'missing } inserted' with: \starttext\startformula \mathop=^{\rm def} \stopformula\stoptext (\mathop{=}^... is fine, though). The above formula is correct in Plain (Lua)TeX (in fact, it is copied from The TeX

[NTG-context] Stacking math symbols

2016-02-23 Thread Nicola
I find it a bit surprising that ConTeXt gives 'missing } inserted' with: \starttext\startformula \mathop=^{\rm def} \stopformula\stoptext (\mathop{=}^... is fine, though). The above formula is correct in Plain (Lua)TeX (in fact, it is copied from The TeX Book). Why does ConTeXt need braces?