Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size

2008-01-22 Thread morgan . brassel
Selon Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Selon Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a > bigger

Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size

2008-01-21 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Selon Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger >> font >>> size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted be

Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size

2008-01-21 Thread Hans Hagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As far as my eyes can see, the results are the same with 10pt and 11pt as > document text size, but not with 12pt. Your two examples in 12pt look > different > to me. Am I wrong? context fonts sizes are not modelled after latex so i can imagine such differences to exi

Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size

2008-01-21 Thread morgan . brassel
Selon Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger > font > > size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the > typographic > > point of view, wh

Re: [NTG-context] Superscript text size

2008-01-21 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger > font > size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the > typographic > point of view, which is the best of the two renderings? > > Thanks for

[NTG-context] Superscript text size

2008-01-21 Thread morgan . brassel
Hi, The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger font size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the typographic point of view, which is the best of the two renderings? Thanks for your advice, Morgan