Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-12 Thread Mari Voipio
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 14:22, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de wrote: testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, Yep. This is my newest find (and this code worked last week...):

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-12 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Mari Voipio mari.voi...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 14:22, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de wrote: testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, Yep. This is my newest find (and this code worked last

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-12 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 11.01.2012 um 17:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:22 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, ... And the numbers of the footnote (= the note's marker) are set smaller with current beta (when

[NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, for example \showframe (must not be used before \starttext anymore?} but what about \definetolerancemethod[...][...]{...} Is this repleaced or deleted? Steffen

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 11.01.2012 um 13:22 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, for example \showframe (must not be used before \starttext anymore?} but what about \definetolerancemethod[...][...]{...} Is this repleaced or

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 11.01.2012 um 13:40 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:22 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, for example \showframe (must not be used before \starttext anymore?} but what about

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 13:22, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, for example \showframe (must not be used before \starttext anymore?} but what about \definetolerancemethod[...][...]{...} Is this repleaced or deleted? Yes,

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, for example \showframe (must not be used before \starttext anymore?} It's a matter of font still not defined at that point:

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 13:50, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: to be read again { l.92 \define{ \sampi}{\greeksampi} hm, i didn't know anyone was using it that way \define\sampi{\greeksampi} should work ok. I'll be a bot more tolerant then. Hans

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 1/11/12 2:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: hm, i didn't know anyone was using it that way \define\sampi{\greeksampi} should work ok. I'll be a bot more tolerant then. Hans Was just about to write; I had found that too about two weeks ago. I don't know if it's incorrect syntax, but it had been

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 14:17, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 1/11/12 2:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: hm, i didn't know anyone was using it that way \define\sampi{\greeksampi} should work ok. I'll be a bot more tolerant then. Hans Was just about to write; I had found that too about two weeks ago. I don't

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 13:55, luigi scarso wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Steffen Wolfrumcont...@st.estfiles.dewrote: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, for example \showframe (must not be used before \starttext anymore?} It's a matter of

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 11.01.2012 um 13:50 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:40 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:22 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence, ... This example hangs: \def\nobreakspace{~}

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:50 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:40 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:22 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:45 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:50 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:40 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:22

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 11.01.2012 um 15:46 schrieb luigi scarso: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:45 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de wrote: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:50 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:40

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 15:46, luigi scarso wrote: ~ is \nobreakspace \unexpanded\def~{\nobreakspace} and you define \def\nobreakspace{~} i.e. an infinte loop, I suppose. indeed, and it's a bonus that ~ == nobreakspace (although I can imagine that we'd get rid of it) but defining other macros in

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 16:18, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: hmm ... this line \def\nobreakspace{~} is part of my environment file for more than 7 years now! (can't remember if it was necessary back then ... ;o) we're moving away from active characters and characters with special meanings so the reversal

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote: hmm ... this line \def\nobreakspace{ is part of my environment file for more than 7 years now! (can't remember if it was necessary back then ... ;o) Steffen I have a \def\nobreakspace

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 11.01.2012 um 15:38 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:50 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:40 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 13:22 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, testing the current beta gave me several errors and Undefined control sequence,

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 16:48, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: \def\dofloatboxnormalbotstackbuilder {\setbox\scratchbox\vbox {\tempfloatwidth\wd\tempfloatbox \vskip5.0pt \ifparfloat \hbox{\hbox {\box\tempfloatbox }}% \dofloatboxbetweenstack

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 11.01.2012 um 16:36 schrieb luigi scarso: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de wrote: hmm ... this line \def\nobreakspace{ is part of my environment file for more than 7 years now! (can't remember if it was necessary back then ... ;o)

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Alan Braslau
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:23:28PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: indeed, and it's a bonus that ~ == nobreakspace (although I can imagine that we'd get rid of it) but defining other macros in terms of active characters is a bad idea (in fact one can use the unicode nbsp character) I have

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Alan Braslau
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Alan Braslau wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:23:28PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: indeed, and it's a bonus that ~ == nobreakspace (although I can imagine that we'd get rid of it) but defining other macros in terms of active characters is a bad

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 17:33, Alan Braslau wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Alan Braslau wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:23:28PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: indeed, and it's a bonus that ~ == nobreakspace (although I can imagine that we'd get rid of it) but defining other macros in terms

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:42:38PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: Follow-up: :se list lcs=nbsp:~ makes me feel right at home with my traditional TeX usage... my favourite editor shows a nice orange blob when it sees a non breakable space In vim, one can add this to his ~/.vimrc: highlight

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 11.01.2012 um 17:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: ... and what's wrong with this (only reproducible in project structure, see attached)? chap_x.tex only has these 3 minimal lines: \setupalign[line,block,hanging] \setupexternalfigures[directory={./Figuren,../Figuren}]

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 11.01.2012 um 20:31 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: \setupalign[line]%\setfalse\raggedonelinerstate \starttext \externalfigure[cow] \stoptext That's new... \setfalse\raggedonelinerstate wasn't needed with 2011.11.29, at least. Why is it necessary now? Steffen

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 11.01.2012 um 20:44 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 20:31 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: \setupalign[line]%\setfalse\raggedonelinerstate \starttext \externalfigure[cow] \stoptext That's new... \setfalse\raggedonelinerstate wasn't needed with 2011.11.29, at least. Why

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 20:31, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 11.01.2012 um 17:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: ... and what's wrong with this (only reproducible in project structure, see attached)? chap_x.tex only has these 3 minimal lines: \setupalign[line,block,hanging]

Re: [NTG-context] Surprising changes in vers. 2012.01.11

2012-01-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-1-2012 20:51, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 11.01.2012 um 20:44 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Am 11.01.2012 um 20:31 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: \setupalign[line]%\setfalse\raggedonelinerstate \starttext \externalfigure[cow] \stoptext That's new... \setfalse\raggedonelinerstate wasn't